Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number 001-32195

 


 

Genworth Financial, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


Delaware   33-1073076

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

6620 West Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23230

(804) 281-6000

(Address and Telephone Number of Principal Executive Offices)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

 

Title of Each Class


 

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered


Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

6.00% Equity Units

 

New York Stock Exchange

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

5.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, Liquidation Preference $50 per share

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Exchange Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x

  Accelerated filer  ¨   Non-accelerated filer  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

As of February 23, 2006, 384,744,479 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 86,216,559 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

 

The aggregate market value of the common equity (based on the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on The New York Stock Exchange) held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2005, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $6.86 billion. All 10% and greater stockholders, executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be “affiliates” of the registrant.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the 2006 annual meeting of the registrant’s stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Table of Contents

Table of Contents

 

          Page

PART I

         

Item 1.

  

Business

   1

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

   72

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   98

Item 2.

  

Properties

   98

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   98

Item 4.

  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   100

PART II

         

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   101

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   102

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   105

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   157

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   160

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   226

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   226

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   228

PART III

         

Item 10.

  

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

   228

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

   233

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   233

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   233

Item 14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   233

PART IV

         

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   234


Table of Contents

PART I

 

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, “Genworth,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Genworth Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries and include the operations of the businesses acquired from General Electric Company, or GE, in connection with our corporate reorganization referred in note 1 to the financial statements under “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For a discussion of selected insurance terms; refer to Glossary of Selected Insurance Terms at the end of “Item 1—Business.”

 

Item 1. Business

 

Overview

 

We are a leading insurance company in the U.S., with an expanding international presence, serving the life and lifestyle protection, retirement income, investment and mortgage insurance needs of more than 15 million customers. We have leadership positions in key products that we expect will benefit from a number of significant demographic, governmental and market trends. We distribute our products and services through an extensive and diversified distribution network that includes financial intermediaries, independent producers and dedicated sales specialists. We conduct operations in 24 countries and have approximately 6,900 employees.

 

Looking at the markets we serve, we see aging populations with inadequate savings and rising health care costs, where burdens are increasingly shifted from governments and corporations to individuals. In addition, we see initiatives by governments to foster individual ownership—from homeownership to providing for one’s own financial security. We are dedicated to helping individuals succeed financially in this world of shifting burdens through our focus on protection, retirement income and investments, and homeownership. We deliver protection, helping people build a personal safety net through life and long-term care insurance, payment protection coverage, and benefits for employees of small companies. We concentrate on retirement income, helping people create an income annuity for life or other desired periods, while also helping them invest to achieve their financial dreams. We also enable homeownership, helping people achieve this dream with lower down payments through the use of mortgage insurance. Across our businesses we link valued services such as education, wellness programs, and technology to our insurance products in order to differentiate ourselves, make us easier to do business with, and help our business partners grow and succeed.

 

We have three operating segments:

 

    Protection. We offer U.S. customers life insurance, long-term care insurance and, primarily for companies with fewer than 1,000 employees, group life and health insurance. In Europe, we offer payment protection insurance, which helps consumers meet their payment obligations in the event of illness, involuntary unemployment, disability or death. In 2005, we were the leading provider of individual long-term care insurance and a leading provider of term life insurance in the U.S., according to LIMRA International (in each case based upon annualized first-year premiums). Our leadership in long-term care insurance is based upon over 30 years of product underwriting and claims experience. This experience has enabled us to build and benefit from what we believe is the largest actuarial database in the long-term care insurance industry. We are a leading provider of term life insurance through brokerage general agencies in the U.S. which we consider to be the largest distribution channel for term life insurance. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our Protection segment had segment net earnings of $568 million.

 

   

Retirement Income and Investments. We offer U.S. customers fixed and variable deferred annuities, fixed immediate annuities, variable life insurance, asset management, and specialized products, including guaranteed investment contracts, or GICs, funding agreements and structured settlements. We are an established provider of these products. In 2005, according to VARDS, we were the largest provider of variable income annuities in the U.S., and according to LIMRA International, we were the

 

1


Table of Contents
 

second-largest provider of fixed immediate annuities in the U.S. (in each case based upon total premiums and deposits). For the year ended December 31, 2005, our Retirement Income and Investments segment had segment net earnings of $247 million.

 

    Mortgage Insurance. In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, New Zealand, Mexico and Japan, we offer mortgage insurance products that facilitate homeownership by enabling borrowers to buy homes with low-down-payment mortgages. These products generally also aid financial institutions in managing their capital efficiently by reducing the capital required for low-down-payment mortgages. According to Inside Mortgage Finance, in 2005, we were the fifth-largest provider of mortgage insurance in the U.S. based on flow new insurance written. We also believe we are the largest provider of private mortgage insurance outside the U.S. with leading mortgage insurance operations in Canada, Australia, Europe and New Zealand and a growing presence in Mexico and Japan. The net premiums written in our international mortgage insurance business have increased by a compound annual growth rate of 32% for the three years ended December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our Mortgage Insurance segment had segment net earnings of $507 million.

 

We also have a Corporate and Other segment which consists primarily of unallocated corporate income and expenses (including amounts incurred in settlement of some class action lawsuits), the results of small, non-core businesses that are managed outside our operating segments, most of our interest and other financing expenses and net realized investment gains (losses). For the year ended December 31, 2005, our Corporate and Other segment had segment net losses of $101 million.

 

We had $13.3 billion of total stockholders’ equity and $105.3 billion of total assets as of December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2005 our revenues were $10.5 billion and our net earnings from continuing operations were $1.2 billion. Our principal life insurance companies have financial strength ratings of “AA-” (Very Strong) from S&P, “Aa3” (Excellent) from Moody’s, “A+” (Superior) from A.M. Best and “AA-” (Very Strong) from Fitch, and our rated mortgage insurance companies have financial strength ratings of “AA” (Very Strong) from S&P, “Aa2” (Excellent) from Moody’s and “AA” (Very Strong) from Fitch. The “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of S&P’s 20 ratings categories, respectively. The “Aa2” and “Aa3” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Moody’s 21 ratings categories, respectively. The “A+” rating is the second-highest of A.M. Best’s 15 ratings categories. The “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Fitch’s 24 ratings categories, respectively.

 

We were incorporated in Delaware in 2003 in preparation for our corporate reorganization and an initial public offering of our common stock, which was completed on May 28, 2004 (“IPO”). Refer to note 1 in our financial statements under “Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional information.

 

Market Environment and Opportunities

 

We believe we are well positioned to benefit from a number of significant demographic, governmental and market trends, including the following:

 

   

Aging U.S. population with growing retirement income needs. According to a 2005 report issued by the U.S. Social Security Administration, from 1945 to 2004, U.S. life expectancy at birth increased from 62.9 years to 74.6 years for men and from 68.4 years to 79.6 years for women, respectively, and life expectancy is expected to increase further. In addition, increasing numbers of baby boomers are approaching retirement age. Based on the 2000 census, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that the percentage of the U.S. population aged 55 or older will increase from approximately 22% (65 million) in 2004 to more than 29% (97 million) in 2020. These increases in life expectancy heighten the risk that individuals will outlive their retirement savings. In addition, approximately $4.2 trillion of invested financial assets are held by people within 10 years of retirement and approximately $2.4 trillion of invested financial assets are held by individuals who are under age 70 and consider themselves retired, in each case according to a survey conducted by SRI Consulting Business Intelligence in 2004. Also,

 

2


Table of Contents
 

many companies have discontinued or reduced participation in defined-contribution pension plans in recent years, and the Social Security Administration projected in 2005 that the annual costs of Social Security will exceed the program’s tax revenue under current law in 2017, creating the need for individuals to identify alternative sources of income. We believe these trends will lead to growing demand for products, such as our income annuities and other investment products, that help consumers accumulate assets and provide reliable retirement income.

 

    Growing lifestyle protection gap. The aging U.S. population and a number of other factors are creating a significant lifestyle protection gap for a growing number of individuals. This gap is the result of individuals not having sufficient resources, including insurance coverage, to ensure that their future assets and income will be adequate to support their desired lifestyle. Other factors contributing to this gap include declining individual savings rates, rising healthcare and nursing care costs, and a shifting of the burden for funding protection needs from governments and employers to individuals. For example, many companies have reduced employer-paid benefits in recent years, and as noted earlier, the rising annual costs in Social Security may create the potential for both long-term benefit reductions from these traditional sources and the need for individuals to identify alternative sources for these benefits. Consumers are exposed to the rising costs of healthcare and nursing care during their retirement years, and some experts believe that many consumers are underinsured with respect to their protection needs. For example, according to the American Society on Aging and Conning Research & Consulting, approximately 70% of individuals in the U.S. age 65 and older will require long-term care at some time in their lives. However, in 2004, less than 10% of the individuals in the U.S. age 55 and older had long-term care insurance, according to statistics published by LIMRA International and the U.S. Census Bureau. Moreover, the most recent Survey of Consumer Finances conducted by the Federal Reserve Board found that the median household’s life insurance coverage decreased in recent years to 1.4 times household income, which we believe leaves a significant life insurance protection gap for individuals and families. We expect these trends to result in increased demand for our life, long-term care and small group life and health insurance products.

 

    Increasing opportunities for mortgage insurance internationally and in the U.S. We believe a number of factors have contributed and will contribute to the growth of mortgage insurance in Canada, Australia and the U.S., where we have significant mortgage insurance operations. These factors include increasing homeownership levels (spurred in part by government housing policies that favor homeownership and demographic factors driving demand for housing, including an increase in minority and immigrant homebuyers, particularly in the U.S.); expansion of low-down-payment mortgage loan offerings; legislative and regulatory policies that provide capital incentives for lenders to transfer the risks of low-down-payment mortgages to mortgage insurers; and expansion of secondary mortgage markets that require credit enhancements, such as mortgage insurance. We believe a number of these factors also are becoming evident in some European, Latin American and Asian markets, where lenders increasingly are using mortgage insurance to manage the risks of their loan portfolios and to expand low-down-payment lending.

 

Competitive Strengths

 

We believe the following competitive strengths will enable us to capitalize on opportunities in our targeted markets:

 

    Leading positions in diversified targeted markets. We believe our leading positions in our targeted markets, including individual long-term care insurance, term life insurance and fixed immediate annuities in the U.S., payment protection insurance in Europe and international mortgage insurance, provide us with the scale necessary to compete effectively in these markets as they grow. We also believe our strong presence in multiple markets provides balance to our business, reduces our exposure to adverse economic trends affecting any one market and provides stable cash flow to fund growth opportunities.

 

3


Table of Contents
    Product innovation and breadth. We have a tradition of developing innovative financial products to serve the needs of our customers. We offer a breadth of products that meet the needs of consumers throughout the various stages of their lives, thereby positioning us to benefit from the current trend among distributors to reduce the number of insurers with whom they maintain relationships. We are selective in the products we offer and strive to maintain appropriate return and risk thresholds when we expand the scope of our product offerings.

 

    Extensive, multi-channel distribution network. We have extensive distribution reach and offer consumers access to our products through a broad network of financial intermediaries, independent producers and dedicated sales specialists. In addition, we maintain strong relationships with leading distributors by providing a high level of specialized and differentiated distribution support and through technology and service solutions that support the distributors’ sales efforts.

 

    Technology-enhanced, service-oriented, scalable, low-cost operating platform. We have pursued an aggressive approach to cost-management and continuous customer service improvement. We use sophisticated technology tools that enhance performance by automating key processes and reducing response times and process variations. Our teams of trained associates focus on delivering superior customer service. In addition, we have centralized our operations and have established scalable, low-cost operating centers in Virginia, North Carolina and Ireland. Through an outsourcing provider, we also have a substantial team of professionals in India who provide us with a variety of back office support services.

 

    Disciplined risk management with strong compliance practices. Risk management and regulatory compliance are critical parts of our business. We employ comprehensive risk management processes in virtually every aspect of our operations, including product development, underwriting, investment management, asset-liability management and technology development programs.

 

    Strong balance sheet and high-quality investment portfolio. We believe our size, ratings and capital strength provide us with a significant competitive advantage. We have a diversified, high-quality investment portfolio with $66.5 billion of invested assets as of December 31, 2005. Approximately 95% of our fixed maturities had ratings equivalent to investment-grade, and less than 1% of our total investment portfolio consisted of equity securities, as of December 31, 2005. We also actively manage the relationship between our investment assets and our insurance liabilities.

 

    Experienced and deep management team. Our senior management team has an average of approximately 19 years of experience in the financial services industry. We have an established track record for successfully developing managerial talent at all levels of our organization and have instilled a performance- and execution-oriented corporate culture.

 

Growth Strategies

 

Our objective is to increase operating earnings and enhance returns on equity. We intend to pursue this objective by focusing on the following strategies:

 

    Capitalize on attractive growth prospects in three key markets. We have positioned our product portfolio and distribution relationships to capitalize on the attractive growth prospects in three key markets:

 

Retirement income, where we believe growth will be driven by a variety of favorable demographic trends and the approximately $4.2 trillion of invested financial assets in the U.S. that are held by people within 10 years of retirement and $2.4 trillion of invested financial assets that are held by individuals who are under age 70 and consider themselves retired, in each case according to a survey conducted by SRI Consulting Business Intelligence in 2004. Our products are designed to enable the growing retired population to convert their accumulated assets into reliable income throughout their retirement years.

 

4


Table of Contents

Protection, particularly life insurance, long-term care insurance and payment protection insurance. In life insurance, we believe growth will be driven by the significant life insurance gap for individuals and families. In long-term care insurance, we believe growth will be driven by the increasing protection needs of the expanding aging population and a shifting of the burden for funding these needs from governments and employers to individuals. In our payment protection insurance business, we believe market growth will result from the increase in consumer borrowing across Europe, the expansion of the European Union and reduced unemployment benefits in the European markets where we offer our products.

 

International mortgage insurance, where we continue to see attractive growth opportunities with the expansion of homeownership and low-down-payment loans. The net premiums written in our international mortgage insurance business have increased by a compound annual growth rate of 32% for the three years ended December 31, 2005.

 

    Further strengthen and extend our distribution channels. We intend to further strengthen and extend our distribution channels by continuing to differentiate ourselves in areas where we believe we have distinct competitive advantages. These areas include:

 

Product and service innovations, as illustrated by new product introductions, such as the introduction of ClearCourseSM for the employer sponsored 401(k) market, our VantagePointSM and MasterKeySM return of premium term products, our Income Distribution Series of guaranteed income products and riders, our long-term care insurance products for the group market, our Homeopeners® mortgage insurance products designed to attract first time home buyers, our private mortgage insurance products in the European market, and our service innovations, which include programs such as automated underwriting in our life, long-term care and mortgage insurance businesses, dedicated customer service teams, and customer care programs supporting wellness and homeownership.

 

Collaborative approach to key distributors, which includes our joint business improvement programs and our tailored approach to our sales intermediaries addressing their unique service needs, which have benefited our distributors and helped strengthen our relationships with them.

 

Technology initiatives, such as our proprietary underwriting systems, which have made it easier for distributors to do business with us, improved our term life, long-term care and mortgage insurance underwriting speed and accuracy, and lowered our operating costs.

 

    Enhance returns on capital and increase margins. We believe we will be able to enhance our returns on capital and increase our margins through the following means:

 

Adding new business layers at targeted returns and optimizing mix. We have introduced new products and revised pricing in a number of business lines, which we believe will increase our expected returns. In U.S. mortgage insurance, we are targeting distribution segments in which we can generate new business at higher returns in order to shift our overall mix of new business.

 

Capital efficiency and management. We continually seek opportunities to use our capital more efficiently, while maintaining our ratings and strong capital position. We have developed a capital markets solution to fund additional statutory reserves on our term life insurance policies related to Regulation XXX, and we are working to develop similar structures for other product lines, including universal life insurance. In addition, we intend to complement our core growth strategy through selective acquisitions designed to enhance product and distribution capabilities and returns, the breadth of our product portfolio, or our distribution reach. We have successfully completed the acquisition and integration of several key businesses since 1993. In addition to pursuing opportunities for core growth and accretive acquisitions, we also will consider making share repurchases and increasing dividends on our common stock.

 

5


Table of Contents

Run-off of low return blocks and redeployment of capital. We have exited or placed in run-off certain product lines in blocks of business with low returns, including, for example, our older, fixed GICs, older generation long-term care policies and certain payment protection insurance contracts in the U.K. As these blocks continue to decrease, we expect to release capital over time to deploy to higher-return products and/or businesses.

 

Ongoing operating cost reductions and efficiencies. We continually focus on reducing our cost base while maintaining strong service levels for our customers. We expect to accomplish this goal in each of our operating units through a wide range of cost management disciplines, including consolidating operations, using low-cost operating locations, reducing supplier costs, leveraging process improvement efforts, forming focused teams to identify opportunities for cost reductions and investing in new technology, particularly for web-based, digital end-to-end processes.

 

Investment income enhancements. The yield on our investment portfolio is affected by the practice, prior to our IPO, of realizing investment gains through the sale of appreciated securities and other assets during a period of historically low interest rates. This strategy had been pursued to offset impairments in our investment portfolio, fund consolidations and restructurings, and provide current income. Since 2003, our investment strategy has been to optimize investment income without relying on realized investment gains. We continue to experience a challenging interest-rate environment in which the yields that we can achieve on new investments are lower than the aggregate yield on our existing portfolio. We will seek to mitigate declines in investment yields by continuously evaluating and potentially repositioning our asset class mix, pursuing additional investment classes, utilizing active management strategies, and accepting additional credit risk when we believe that it is prudent to do so.

 

 

Protection

 

Through our Protection segment, we offer life insurance, long-term care insurance, payment protection insurance and employment-based group life and health insurance. The following table sets forth financial information regarding our Protection segment as of or for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. For additional selected financial information and operating performance measures regarding our Protection segment as of or for these periods, see “Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Protection.”

 

     As of or for the years ended
December 31,


(Dollar amounts in millions)


   2005

   2004

   2003

Revenues

                    

Life insurance

   $ 1,623    $ 1,518    $ 1,443

Long-term care insurance

     2,347      2,311      2,408

Payment protection insurance(1)

     1,439      1,549      1,615

Group life and health insurance

     717      686      677
    

  

  

Total revenues

   $ 6,126    $ 6,064    $ 6,143
    

  

  

Segment net earnings

                    

Life insurance

   $ 275    $ 245    $ 211

Long-term care insurance

     172      172      171

Payment protection insurance

     90      81      64

Group life and health insurance

     31      30      41
    

  

  

Total segment net earnings

   $ 568    $ 528    $ 487
    

  

  

Total segment assets

   $ 33,871    $ 31,806    $ 29,254
    

  

  


(1) Payment protection insurance revenues include revenues related to certain distribution relationships in runoff as further described herein; our life, long-term care and group life and health insurance businesses do not have runoff businesses that have a significant impact on revenues from year to year.

 

6


Table of Contents

Life insurance

 

Overview

 

Our life insurance business markets and sells term and universal life, insurance products that provide a personal financial safety net for individuals and their families. These products provide protection against financial hardship after the death of an insured by providing cash payments to the beneficiaries of the policyholder. Some types of life insurance also offer a savings element that can be used to help accumulate funds to meet future financial needs. According to the American Council of Life Insurers, sales of new life insurance coverage in the U.S. were $3.1 trillion in 2004, and total life insurance coverage in the U.S. was $17.5 trillion as of December 31, 2004. Excluding variable life insurance sales, annualized first-year premiums for life insurance increased by an average of 14% per year from 2000 to 2005, according to LIMRA International.

 

Our principal life insurance product is term life, which provides life insurance coverage with guaranteed level premiums for a specified period of time. Term life insurance has little or no buildup of cash value that is payable upon lapse of the coverage. We have been a leading provider of term life insurance for more than two decades, and we believe that we are a leading provider of term life insurance through brokerage general agencies in the U.S. In addition to term life insurance, we offer universal life insurance products, which are designed to provide protection for the entire life of the insured and may include a buildup of cash value that can be used to meet particular financial needs during the policyholder’s lifetime. Our life insurance business also includes a run-off block of whole life insurance.

 

During 2005, sales of our term life insurance products and universal life insurance products increased 35% and 74%, respectively, from 2004, largely due to price reductions for term life policies, new product introductions, distribution expansion and initiatives to enhance our service offerings. In January 2005, we leveraged our capital efficiency to reduce selected prices of our term life insurance. We introduced new, competitively positioned products in both our term and universal life insurance product lines, adding in February 2005 what we believe is an attractively priced survivorship universal life product, Lifetime ProviderSM SUL, and entering the fast-growing return of premium (“ROP”) term life market in October 2005 with our VantagePointSM product. We also implemented several enhancements to our existing universal life product portfolio, demonstrating our strong commitment to this market. We broadened our distribution, adding approximately 50 new brokerage general agencies and 17 new insurance marketing organizations with more than 5,000 producers during the year, while continuing to leverage our technology enhanced customer service platform.

 

We price our insurance policies based primarily upon our own historical experience in the risk categories that we target. Our pricing strategy is to target individuals in preferred risk categories and offer them attractive products at competitive prices. Preferred risks include healthier individuals who generally have family histories that do not present increased mortality risk. We also have significant expertise in evaluating people with health problems and offer appropriately priced coverage for people who meet our underwriting criteria.

 

We offer our life insurance products primarily through an extensive network of independent brokerage general agencies located throughout the U.S. We also offer our life insurance products through affluent market producer groups, financial intermediaries, and insurance marketing organizations. We believe there are opportunities to expand our sales through each of these distribution channels.

 

Products

 

Term life insurance

 

Our term life insurance policies provide a death benefit if the insured dies while the coverage is in-force. Term life policies lapse with little or no required payment by us at the end of the coverage period if the insured is still alive. We also offer policyholders the right to convert most of our term insurance policies to specified life insurance policies issued by us. We seek to reduce the mortality risk associated with conversion by restricting its availability to certain ages and by limiting the period during which the conversion option can be exercised.

 

7


Table of Contents

Our primary term life insurance products have guaranteed level premiums for initial terms of 5, 10, 15, 20 or 30 years. In addition, our 5-year products offer, at the end of the initial term, a second 5-year term of level premiums, which may or may not be guaranteed. After the guaranteed period expires, premiums increase annually and the policyholder has the option to continue under the current policy by paying the increased premiums without demonstrating insurability or by qualifying for a new policy by submitting again to the underwriting process. Coverage continues until the insured reaches the policy expiration age or the policyholder ceases to make premium payments or otherwise terminates the policy, including potentially converting to a permanent plan of insurance. The termination of coverage is called a lapse. For newer policies, we seek to reduce lapses at the end of the guaranteed period by gradually adjusting premiums to the attained age of the insured over the five years following the guaranteed period. After this phase-in period, premiums continue to increase as the insured ages.

 

VantagePointSM is a term product with a return of premium feature. Available for initial terms of 15, 20 or 30 years, it has a cash value rider that provides for a return of 100% of total net paid premiums at the end of the initial term, if a death benefit has not been paid. Cash values begin after the fourth year and are available for policy loans.

 

Universal life insurance

 

Our universal life insurance policies provide policyholders with lifetime death benefit coverage, the ability to accumulate assets on a flexible, tax-deferred basis, and the option to access the cash value of the policy through a policy loan, partial withdrawal or full surrender. Our universal life products allow policyholders to adjust the timing and amount of premium payments. We credit premiums paid, less certain expenses, to the policyholder’s account and from that account deduct regular expense charges and certain risk charges, known as cost of insurance, which generally increase from year to year as the insured ages. Our universal life insurance policies accumulate cash value that we pay to the policyholder when the policy lapses or is surrendered. Most of our universal life policies also include provisions for surrender charges for early termination and partial withdrawals. As of December 31, 2005, 54% of our in-force block of universal life insurance was subject to surrender charges. We also sell joint, second-to-die policies that are typically used for estate planning purposes. These policies insure two lives rather than one, with the policy proceeds paid after the death of both insured individuals.

 

We credit interest on policyholder account balances at a rate determined by us, but not less than a contractually or regulatorily mandated guaranteed minimum. Our in-force universal life insurance policies generally have minimum guaranteed crediting rates ranging from 3.0% to 6.0% for the life of the policy.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

We believe effective underwriting and pricing are significant drivers of the profitability of our life insurance business, and we have established rigorous underwriting and pricing practices to maximize our profitability. We retain most of the risk we currently underwrite, thereby limiting the premiums ceded to reinsurers. We generally reinsure risks in excess of $1 million per life, and the reinsured amount is generally based on the policy amount at the time of issue. We set pricing assumptions for expected claims, lapses, investment returns, expenses and customer demographics based on our own relevant experience and other factors. Our strategy is to price our products competitively for our target risk categories and not necessarily to be equally competitive in all categories.

 

Our current underwriting guidelines place each insurable life insurance applicant in one of eight primary risk categories, depending upon current health, medical history and other factors. Each of these eight categories has specific health criteria, including the applicant’s history of using nicotine products. We consider each life insurance application individually and apply our guidelines to place each applicant in the appropriate risk category, regardless of face value or net amount at risk. We may decline an applicant’s request for coverage if his

 

8


Table of Contents

health or lifestyle assessment is unacceptable to us. We do not delegate underwriting decisions to independent sales intermediaries. Instead, underwriting decisions are generally made by our own underwriting personnel or by our automated underwriting system. We often share information with our reinsurers to gain their insights on potential mortality and underwriting risks and to benefit from their broad expertise. We use the information we obtain from the reinsurers to help us develop effective strategies to manage those risks.

 

A key part of our life insurance underwriting program is the streamlined, technology-enhanced process called GENIUS®, which automates new business processing for term life insurance. GENIUS® has shortened the cycle time from the receipt of an application to issuance of a policy, reduced policy acquisition costs and improved the consistency and accuracy of our underwriting decisions by reducing decision-making variation.

 

Long-term care insurance

 

Overview

 

We offer individual long-term care insurance products that provide protection against the high and escalating costs of long-term health care provided in the insured’s home and in assisted living and nursing facilities. Insureds become eligible for benefits when they are incapable of performing certain activities of daily living or when they become cognitively impaired. In contrast to health insurance, long-term care insurance provides coverage for skilled and custodial care provided outside of a hospital. The typical claim has a duration of care of approximately 1 to 4 years.

 

We established ourselves as a pioneer in long-term care insurance over 30 years ago. Since that time, we have accumulated extensive pricing and claims experience, which we believe is the most comprehensive in the industry and has enabled us to build what we believe is the largest actuarial database in the industry. Our experience helps us plan for long term, consistent success and has enabled us to develop a disciplined growth strategy built on a foundation of strong risk management, product innovation and a diversified distribution strategy.

 

In 2005, we introduced a series of product upgrades designed to provide a variety of pricing and benefit options, enhance service capabilities and simplify and broaden our individual product features. In addition, we launched our group long-term care insurance product and expanded our Medicare supplement product in a majority of states and have seen growth in these new states. In January 2006, we agreed to acquire Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee, a provider of Medicare supplement insurance, for approximately $145 million. Continental Life will enhance our presence in Medicare supplement insurance by more than doubling our existing annualized premium in-force for this product. The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2006.

 

Total individual long-term care insurance premiums for in-force policies in the U.S. increased from approximately $2.4 billion in 1997 to $7.3 billion in 2005, according to LIMRA International. Industry-wide sales of individual long-term care insurance achieved a historical high in 2002 at approximately $1.0 billion and decreased 35% to $661 million in 2005. We believe this decrease was due primarily to decision by several providers to cease offering long-term care insurance, to raise premiums on inforce policies and/or to introduce new products with higher prices. These actions resulted in decreased purchases of long-term care insurance products and have caused some distributors to reduce their sales focus on these products. Notwithstanding the industry trends, we believe that over time, the long-term care insurance market will expand as the result of aging demographics, increasing healthcare and nursing care costs, the uncertainty regarding government programs that currently cover these costs and the increasing public awareness of the benefits of private long-term care insurance.

 

As the leading provider of individual long-term care insurance, we have made significant investments to further the education and awareness of the benefits of long-term care insurance. In 2005, we entered into a five year strategic relationship with the Alzheimer’s Association to help sponsor public awareness and eliminate Alzheimer’s disease through education and the advancement of research. As a part of this relationship, we will

 

9


Table of Contents

engage in a variety of co-branded initiatives including advertising, policyholder and consumer information materials and web support. In addition, we will continue to sponsor the Association’s “Memory Walk”. In 2004, we also entered into a strategic alliance with the Corporation for Long-Term Care Certification, Inc., a nationally recognized long-term care training organization, to educate and train our independent producers in how to help solve clients’ long-term care needs. Through our sponsorship, approximately 11,000 producers have attended this program.

 

Throughout our history, we have consistently been a leader in product innovation. We were one of the first long-term care insurers to offer home care coverage and the first to offer shared plan coverage for married couples and domestic partners. We developed these innovations based upon our risk analytics and in response to policyholder needs and emerging claims experience. Our most recent innovations have included our policyholder wellness initiatives that are designed to improve the overall health of our policyholders. These initiatives provide valuable services to our policyholders, reduce claims expenses and differentiate us from our competitors.

 

We distribute our products through diversified sales channels consisting of more than 120,000 appointed independent producers, financial intermediaries and 1,350 dedicated sales specialists. Approximately 300 employees support these diversified distribution channels.

 

Products

 

Our principal product is individual long-term care insurance. Prior to the mid-1990s, we issued primarily indemnity policies, which provide for fixed daily amounts for long-term care benefits. Since the mid-1990s, we have offered primarily reimbursement policies, which provide for reimbursement of documented and approved expenses for nursing home, assisted living facilities or home care expenses. As of December 31, 2005, our in-force policies consisted of approximately 86% reimbursement policies and 14% indemnity policies, measured on a premium-weighted basis. Reimbursement policies permit us to review individual claims expenses and, therefore, provide greater control over claims cost management than indemnity policies.

 

Our products provide customers with a choice of a maximum period of coverage from two years to ten years, as well as lifetime coverage. Our current products also provide customers with different choices for the maximum reimbursement limit for their policy, with $100 to $150 per day being the most common choices nationwide. Our new policies can be purchased with a benefit increase option that provides for increases in the maximum reimbursement limit at a fixed rate of 5% per year, which helps to mitigate customers’ exposure to increasing long-term care costs. Many long-term care insurance policies sold in the industry have a feature referred to as an elimination period that is a minimum period of time that an insured must incur the direct cost of care before becoming eligible for policy benefits. Although many of our new policies have no elimination period for home care coverage, the majority of our new policies do have an elimination period for care provided in assisted living and nursing facilities. All of these product features allow customers to tailor their coverage to meet their specific requirements and allow us to price our products with better predictability regarding future claim costs.

 

We sell our long-term care insurance policies on a guaranteed renewable basis, which means that we are required to renew the policies each year as long as the premium is paid. The terms of all our long-term care insurance policies permit us to increase premiums during the premium-paying period if appropriate in light of our experience with a relevant group of policies. We may increase premiums on a group of policies in response to those policies’ performance, subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals. However, we may not increase premiums due to changes in an individual’s health status or age.

 

We also offer Medicare supplement insurance providing coverage for Medicare-qualified expenses that are not covered by Medicare because of applicable deductibles or maximum limits. Medicare supplement insurance often appeals to a similar sector of the population as long-term care insurance, and we believe we will be able to use our marketing and distribution strengths for long-term care insurance products to increase sales of Medicare supplement insurance.

 

10


Table of Contents

In February 2006, the President signed into law the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which included provisions permitting states to participate in long-term care partnership program by filing Medicaid plan amendments. Under the partnership program, consumers in participating states will benefit because they will be permitted to protect assets equal to the amount of long-term care insurance benefits they use without affecting Medicaid eligibility. For example, if a partnership policyholder uses $250,000 of long-term care insurance benefits, the policyholder will be able to keep $250,000 of assets and still access Medicaid for remaining care needs. Under the legislation, states seeking to participate in the program need to file Medicaid Plan Amendments with the United States Department of Health and Human Services to participate in the partnership program and those amendments will need to be approved. The legislation’s impact on long-term care insurance sales in the short-term is uncertain as states enroll to participate in the partnership program and as consumers and financial planners begin to understand the Medicaid reforms. In the long-term, we expect the partnership feature to expand the long-term care insurance market in participating states to purchasers who would otherwise engage in Medicaid planning as an alternative to long-term care insurance, although we are unable to predict the impact this will have on our future sales.

 

The United States Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, has also recognized the importance of long-term care insurance by sponsoring an educational campaign entitled “Own Your Future,” which seeks to educate 50-70 year-olds about the need to plan for long-term care needs, including considering long-term care insurance. Under the campaign, HHS mails out a letter to the target audience in select states, under signature of the state’s governor, offering a long-term care planning kit which can be obtained by calling a toll-free number. In 2005, HHS launched its campaign in Virginia, New Jersey, Arkansas, Idaho, and Nevada. In 2006, HHS will initiate the campaign in Kansas, Maryland and Rhode Island. We expect this campaign to have a favorable impact on sales in states where launched.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

Individual long-term care insurance

 

We employ extensive medical underwriting policies and procedures to assess and quantify risks before we issue our long-term care insurance policies. For individual long-term care products, we use underwriting criteria that are similar to, but separate from, those we use in underwriting life insurance products. Depending upon an applicant’s age and health status, we use a variety of underwriting information sources to determine morbidity risk, or the probability that an insured will be unable to perform activities of daily living or suffer cognitive impairment, and eligibility for insurance. The process entails a comprehensive application that requests health, prescription drug, and lifestyle and activity-related information. Higher-risk applicants are also required to participate in an assessment process by telephone or in person. A critical element of this assessment process is a cognitive examination, in certain cases, to identify early cognitive impairments. In addition, an experienced long-term care insurance underwriter conducts a comprehensive review of the application, the results of the assessment process and, in many cases, complete medical records from the applicant’s physicians. To streamline the underwriting process and improve the accuracy and consistency of our underwriting decisions, we use the GENIUS® automated underwriting technology in our long-term care insurance business.

 

We believe we have one of the largest and most experienced long-term care insurance claims management operations in the industry. Our claims adjudication process includes, with respect to new claims, a pre-claim assessment by an experienced benefits analyst who establishes preliminary claims eligibility, followed by an on-site assessment and care coordination phase to validate eligibility and to work with the customer in determining an appropriate plan of care. Continued claims eligibility is verified through an ongoing eligibility assessment for existing claimants. We will continue to make investments in new processes and technologies that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our long-term care insurance expense tracking and claims decision-making process.

 

The overall profitability of our long-term care insurance policies depends to a large extent on the degree to which our claims experience, morbidity and mortality experience, lapse rates and investment yields match our

 

11


Table of Contents

pricing assumptions. We believe we have the largest actuarial database in the industry, derived from over 30 years of experience in offering long-term care insurance products. This database has provided substantial claims experience and statistics regarding morbidity risk, which has helped us to develop a sophisticated pricing methodology for our newer policies tailored to segmented risk categories, depending upon marital status, medical history and other factors. When we issued our older policies, we did not have the full benefit of this experience and pricing methodology. We continually monitor trends and developments and update assumptions that may affect the risk, pricing and profitability of our long-term care insurance products and adjust our new product pricing and other terms as appropriate. We also work with a Medical Advisory Board, comprising independent experts from the medical technology and public policy fields, that provides insights on emerging morbidity and medical trends, enabling us to be more proactive in our risk segmentation, pricing and product development strategies.

 

Medicare supplement insurance

 

When allowed by state law, we underwrite our Medicare supplement product by asking a series of medical questions on an application and then conducting a phone health interview (PHI). The PHI is designed to verify the answers submitted on the application and is performed by an experienced Medicare supplement professional before the policy is issued. Any discrepancies between the application and the PHI are investigated and the application will be declined if warranted.

 

Where allowed by state law, we segment our Medicare supplement applicants into risk pools based on age, gender, smoking status and geography. These risk classifications allow us to mitigate business mix risk by pricing separately for each risk classification. We perform profitability analyses annually by risk pool and request rate changes from state regulators to maintain our pricing profitability.

 

In the few situations where state law does not permit these underwriting procedures, we issue policies on a guaranteed basis based on pricing models that account for guaranteed issue requirements in these states.

 

Group long-term care insurance

 

The decision to offer group long-term care insurance is a two-step process including first, an assessment of the employer’s risk and second, a risk evaluation of the individual applicant. To evaluate the eligibility of an employer for group long-term care we evaluate the characteristics of the employer including Standard Industry Codes and select demographic measures including age, gender and income. If the risk associated with the employer is deemed acceptable we then conduct a detailed pricing evaluation considering many of these same characteristics that we use in underwriting individual long-term care insurance. The depth of underwriting is determined by the status of the applicant (e.g. active at work, spouse, parents or retiree), the age of the applicant and the level of the employer’s contributions to the employee’s coverage.

 

Payment protection insurance

 

Overview

 

We provide payment protection insurance to customers throughout Europe. Payment protection insurance helps consumers meet their payment obligations on outstanding financial commitments, such as mortgages, personal loans or credit cards, in the event of a misfortune such as illness, involuntary unemployment, temporary incapacity, permanent disability or death. We currently have a presence in the following 17 countries: Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and in the U.K where we have offered payment protection insurance for more than 30 years.

 

We distribute our payment protection products primarily through financial institutions, such as major European banks, which offer our insurance products in connection with underlying loans or other financial

 

12


Table of Contents

products they sell to their customers. Under these arrangements, the distributors typically take responsibility for branding and marketing the products, allowing us to take advantage of their distribution capabilities, while we take responsibility for pricing, underwriting and claims payment. We continue to implement innovative methods for distributing our payment protection insurance products, including using web-based tools that provide our distributors with a cost-effective means of applying and selling our products in combination with a broad range of underlying financial products. We believe these innovative methods also will make it easier to establish arrangements with new distributors.

 

As we enter into new arrangements and as existing arrangements become due for renewal, we are focused on maintaining a disciplined approach to growth, with an emphasis on arrangements that achieve our targeted returns on capital and increase our operating earnings.

 

Products

 

Our principal product is payment protection insurance, which can support any loan, credit agreement or other financial commitment. Depending upon the type of financial product or commitment, our policies may cover all or a portion of the policyholder’s obligation or may cover monthly payments for a fixed period of time. We are able to customize the circumstances under which benefits are paid from among the range of events that can prevent policyholders from meeting their payment obligations. In the event of a policyholder’s illness, involuntary unemployment or other temporary inability to work, we cover monthly payment obligations until the policyholder is able to return to work, subject, in some cases, to a maximum period. In the event of a policyholder’s death or permanent disability, we typically repay the entire covered obligation.

 

In addition to payment protection insurance, we offer related consumer protection products, primarily in the U.K., including personal accident insurance and product purchase protection. We continue to evaluate opportunities to take advantage of our European operations and distribution infrastructure to offer consumer protection insurance products throughout Europe.

 

We work with our distributors to design and promote insurance products in ways that best complement their product strategies and risk profiles and to ensure that our products comply with all applicable consumer regulations. Through this close cooperation, we believe there are opportunities to increase the benefit of these arrangements by extending our payment protection insurance products across the full range of consumer finance products offered by our distributors. We are also working closely with our distributors to help them increase the percentage of their customers who purchase our protection insurance at the time they enter into a loan or financial commitment and reduce the percentage of customers who elect not to renew our policies upon expiration. Consumers generally pay premiums for our insurance to our distributors, who in turn forward these payments to us, typically net of commissions.

 

Consistent with our focus on disciplined growth and returns on capital, as we enter into new arrangements and review existing arrangements with distributors, we seek to manage these arrangements and deploy capital where we believe we can achieve the highest returns while strengthening our client relationships. In some cases, particularly in the U.K., we had arrangements in place that accounted for significant revenue without a corresponding benefit to return on capital. Accordingly, in the third quarter of 2003, we evaluated our contractual relationships with our payment protection insurance distributors against our targeted return thresholds and decided to terminate or not to renew certain relationships that we refer to as “run-off.” Although we expect our revenue to continue to decline over the next few years as existing policies from these less-profitable arrangements continue to run off, we believe this will not have a material impact on our operating earnings and will have a favorable effect on our returns as capital is released and redeployed into markets with potential for higher growth and returns. In October 2005, we also decided to end a relationship with a travel insurance distributor in the U.K., from whom we generated $80 million in revenues in 2005. We expect revenues from this relationship to continue through 2006.

 

13


Table of Contents

We are continuing to diversify and expand our base of distributors. We are also exploring additional growth opportunities in Europe, which we believe will be increasingly receptive to payment protection insurance as consumer lending further develops in those markets. In addition, we believe the accession of additional countries to the European Union will facilitate our entry into those markets.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, GE’s consumer finance division and other related GE entities accounted for 23%, 25% and 13% of our payment protection insurance gross written premiums, respectively. The increase from 2003 to 2004 in the percentage of business relating to GE entities was primarily attributable to the decline in total gross written premiums in our payment insurance business that was due to the significant decrease in premiums relating to our run-off block. In early 2004, we entered into a five-year agreement, subject to certain early termination provisions, that extends our relationship with GE’s consumer finance division and provides us with the right to be the exclusive provider of payment protection insurance in Europe for GE’s consumer finance operations in jurisdictions where we offer these products. The percentage of business relating to GE entities remained relatively flat from 2004 to 2005 due to the stabilization of the run-off block and increased account penetration with existing customers.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

We have more than 30 years of experience in underwriting payment protection insurance. Consistent with market practices, our payment protection insurance currently is underwritten and priced on a program basis, by type of product and by distributor, rather than on the basis of the characteristics of the individual policyholder. In setting prices, we take into account the underlying obligation, the particular product features and the average customer profile of the distributor (including data such as customer age, gender and occupation). We also consider morbidity and mortality rates, lapse rates and investment yields in pricing our products. We believe our experience in underwriting allows us to provide competitive pricing to distributors and generate targeted returns and profits for our business.

 

Group life and health insurance

 

Overview

 

We offer a full range of employment-based benefit products and services targeted primarily at employers with fewer than 1,000 employees, as well as select groups within larger companies that require highly customized benefit plans. Our products include group non-medical insurance products, such as dental, vision, life and disability insurance; group medical insurance products, such as stop loss insurance; and individual voluntary products. We purchase excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to losses from our group non-medical and medical insurance lines.

 

We continue to focus on making it easier for customers to do business with us through an expanded call center and our enhanced on-line servicing capabilities. We implemented a new voluntary administration platform to support our existing and planned group voluntary products. This new platform gives us the ability to electronically integrate our service platform with the customer service call center that support our employer-paid products. We launched new group voluntary short and long-term products in conjunction with a new quoting and risk assessment system. These products complement our existing group voluntary dental and life offerings.

 

We use an independent network of approximately 4,000 licensed group life and health insurance brokers and agents, supported by our nationwide sales force of approximately 100 employees, to distribute our group life and health insurance products. Individual voluntary products are sold through employers and other worksite-based groups using a network of independent insurance producers. As of December 31, 2005, we provided employment-based benefit products and services to more than 31,000 organizations, covering approximately 2.7 million plan participants.

 

14


Table of Contents

Many of the employers in our target market do not have large human resource departments with individuals devoted to benefit design, administration and budgeting. As a result, we work closely with independent group benefit brokers and the end customer or employer to design benefit plans to meet the employer’s particular requirements. Our customers are small and mid-size employers that require knowledgeable independent group benefit brokers and insurance company representatives to understand their individual financial needs and employee profiles and to structure benefit plans that are appropriate for their particular size, geographical markets and resources. We believe our extensive experience and expertise in group life and health insurance products provide us with opportunities to foster close broker relationships and to assist employers in designing benefit plans, as well as selling traditional insurance products.

 

Products

 

We offer a full range of employee benefits products for the group, group voluntary and individual voluntary markets. We sell group benefits exclusively to employers, which pay all or most of the applicable premiums. We sell group voluntary and individual voluntary benefits through employers to employees, who generally pay all or most of the premiums through payroll deductions. Coverage in both group and group voluntary benefits generally ceases upon the termination of employment, whereas coverage in individual voluntary benefits may continue after the termination of employment. Voluntary benefit products enable an employer to expand its available employee benefits without adding to the company’s costs. As a result, these programs allow employees to select benefit packages to meet their individual and family needs and budgets, generally at lower premiums than they would pay for comparable benefit packages assembled independently. Employers help to administer group and group voluntary benefits, and we administer individual voluntary benefits with little involvement from employers.

 

Group non-medical insurance

 

Our group non-medical insurance consists of dental and vision, life and disability insurance products.

 

Dental and vision insurance. Our group dental coverage provides benefits to insured employees and their eligible dependents for specified dental services. We also offer dental managed-care plans, which provide differentiated benefit levels depending upon whether the dental provider is a member of a nationwide network. Vision coverage generally is offered as a supplement to dental coverage.

 

Life insurance. Our group term life insurance product provides benefits in the event of an insured employee’s and their covered dependent’s death. The death benefit can be based upon an individual’s earnings or occupation, or can be fixed at a set dollar amount. Our products also include optional accidental death and dismemberment coverage as a supplement to our term life insurance policies. This coverage provides benefits for an insured employee’s loss of life, limb or sight as a result of accidental death or injury.

 

Disability insurance. Our group long-term disability coverage is designed to cover the risk of employee loss of income during prolonged periods of disability. Our group short-term disability coverage provides partial replacement of an insured employee’s weekly earnings in the event of disability resulting from an injury or illness. Benefits can be a set dollar amount or based upon a percentage of earnings.

 

Group medical insurance

 

Our group medical insurance consists of stop loss insurance and fully insured medical products.

 

Stop loss insurance. Our stop loss insurance coverage is written for employers that self-insure their employee medical benefits and covers the risk of higher-than-expected claims experience. Our coverage provides reimbursement for claims in excess of a predetermined level.

 

15


Table of Contents

Fully insured medical. Our group medical coverage provides benefits for insured employees and their dependents for hospital, surgical and ancillary medical expenses. We offer, on a limited basis, several types of plans with a wide range of plan features, such as indemnity plans, which contain deductibles and co-insurance payments, and preferred provider organization plans, or PPO plans, which reduce deductibles and co-insurance payments for medical services provided by members of a preferred provider network of healthcare providers.

 

Individual voluntary products

 

We offer individual voluntary life and health insurance contracts through worksite marketing programs in which our representatives visit employer premises and make presentations to employees. Our individual health coverage consists primarily of short-term disability and hospital indemnity benefits. Short-term disability benefit periods generally range from nine months to two years while hospital indemnity benefits generally range from $30 to $300 per day. Although the policies are sold in connection with a benefit package offered to company employees, each policyholder receives an individual policy, and coverage can continue after termination of employment if the policyholder continues to make premium payments.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

Group insurance pricing is different from individual product pricing in that it reflects the group’s claims experience, when appropriate. The risk characteristics of each group are reviewed at the time the policy is issued and each year thereafter, resulting in ongoing adjustments to the group’s pricing. The key rating and underwriting criteria are the group’s demographic composition, including the age, gender and family composition of the group’s members, the industry of the group, geographic location, regional economic trends, plan design and the group’s prior claims experience.

 

We have a data warehouse that is integrated with all our claims processing systems. The data warehouse contains at least eight years of experience for each product that helps us predict future experience by modeling the impact of changes in current rates against historic claims. Our automated underwriting quotation and renewal systems efficiently process low-risk cases and identify high-risk cases for further underwriter review. We also have developed proprietary automated underwriting techniques that enhance the speed and accuracy of, and reduce variations in, our underwriting decision-making.

 

Competition

 

We face significant competition in all our Protection segment operations. Our competitors include other large and highly rated insurance carriers. Some of these competitors have greater resources than we do, and many of them offer similar products and use similar distribution channels. We also face competition in our life, long-term care and group insurance product lines from independent sales intermediaries and our dedicated sales specialists. This competition is based primarily upon product pricing and features, compensation and benefits structure and support services offered. We continuously provide technology upgrades and enhanced training, and we seek to improve service for our independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists.

 

In our payment protection insurance business, we are one of the few payment protection insurance providers with operations across Europe. Our competitors are divided into two broad groups: the large pan-European payment protection providers and local competitors, consisting principally of smaller national insurance companies. We also compete with captive insurers, as our distributors increasingly consider the benefits of providing payment protection insurance directly to their customers.

 

16


Table of Contents

Retirement Income and Investments

 

Overview

 

Through our Retirement Income and Investments segment, we offer fixed and variable deferred annuities and income annuities. We offer these products to a broad range of consumers who want to accumulate tax-deferred assets for retirement, desire a reliable source of income during their retirement, and/or seek to protect against outliving their assets during retirement.

 

We offer fixed and variable deferred annuities, in which assets accumulate until the contract is surrendered, the contractholder dies, the contractholder takes withdrawals or the contractholder begins receiving benefits under an annuity payout option. We also offer fixed and variable income annuities including ClearCourseSM for the employer sponsored 401(k) market, in which payments begin within one, three or ten years of issue and continue for a fixed period or for life. We believe our wide range of fixed annuity products has provided a stable source of asset growth during volatile equity and bond markets in recent years, and our variable annuity offerings continue to appeal to contractholders who wish to participate in returns linked to equity and bond markets with many desiring products with options that provide certain minimum guarantees. We also offer variable life insurance through our Retirement Income and Investments segment, because this product provides investment features that are similar to our variable annuity products.

 

In addition to our annuity and variable life insurance products, we offer a number of specialty products, including guaranteed investment contracts, or GICs, funding agreements (including those issued pursuant to our registered notes program) and structured settlements. We sell GICs to ERISA-qualified plans, such as pension and 401(k) plans, and we sell funding agreements to money market funds that are not ERISA qualified and to other institutional investors. Our structured settlements provide an alternative to a lump sum settlement, generally in a personal injury lawsuit, and typically are purchased by property and casualty insurance companies for the benefit of an injured claimant with benefits scheduled to be paid throughout a fixed period or for the life of the claimant. In addition, we offer private asset management services for affluent individual investors.

 

According to LIMRA International, sales of individual annuities were $217 billion in 2005. From June 2004 through December 2005, the Federal Reserve increased short-term rates from 1.0% to 4.25% while long-term interest rates remained relatively stable. This “flattening” of the yield curve resulted in a shift in demand to shorter duration instruments like bank certificates of deposits and money market funds and away from longer-duration products like annuities. Within the fixed annuity market, there was an increasing demand for products with an equity index component, such as equity-indexed annuities. We did not have a product with an equity index component in the market in 2005, but we have launched such a product in the first quarter of 2006. In variable annuities, we expect product demand to be primarily driven by product features and guarantees. Although volatility in the equity markets may cause some potential purchasers to refrain from purchasing products such as variable annuities and variable life insurance, many of today’s purchasers are seeking to remain invested in the equity markets and at the same time have guarantees to protect their income during their retirement years. We believe that moderately higher longer-term interest rates and greater public awareness about the need for lifetime retirement income protection will result in increased demand for annuities and other investment products that help consumers accumulate assets and provide reliable retirement income.

 

We have continued to focus on our Income Distribution Series of variable annuity products and riders in response to customers who desire guaranteed minimum income streams with equity market upside at the end of the contribution and accumulation period. Our Income Distribution Series of variable annuity products and riders provides the contractholder with a guaranteed minimum income stream that they cannot outlive, along with an opportunity to participate in market appreciation, but reduce some of the risks to insurers that generally accompany traditional products with guaranteed minimum income benefits. We are targeting people who are focused on building a personal portable retirement plan or are moving from the accumulation to the distribution phase of their retirement planning. During 2005, we introduced our ClearCourseSM product for the employer sponsored 401(k) market. ClearCourseSM is designed to be an option within a 401(k) plan and offers participants the ability to purchase guaranteed retirement income while maintaining liquidity and the opportunity for market

 

17


Table of Contents

upside. ClearCourseSM provides plan participants with the ability to access defined benefit-like features within a defined contribution environment. In October 2005 we also introduced a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for the life product, Lifetime Income Plus, that was added to our Income Distribution Series products. This product filled a customer need within our Income Distribution Series for guaranteed income payments that the customer cannot outlive, along with the opportunity for appreciation, similar to our RetireReadySM Retirement Answer Variable Annuity (“Retirement Answer”) (formerly known as GE Retirement Answer), and added significant liquidity features. Our Income Distribution Series products are composed of our retirement income and annuity product and four variable annuity riders that provide similar income features.

 

As an enhancement to our spread institutional business, we initiated a $5 billion registered notes program secured by funding agreements in our subsidiaries. This program became effective in December 2005 and provides us the ability to issue fixed or floating rate offerings with maturities ranging from 9 months to 30 years. Our initial issuance through this program was a five-year, $300 million floating rate funding agreement, which was funded during December 2005.

 

We offer our annuities and other investment products primarily through financial institutions and specialized brokers, as well as independent accountants and independent advisers associated with our captive broker/dealer. We provide extensive training and support to our distributors through a wholesaling sales force that specializes in retirement income needs.

 

The following table sets forth financial information regarding our Retirement Income and Investments segment as of the dates or for the periods indicated. Additional selected financial information and operating performance metrics regarding our Retirement Income and Investments segment as of or for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are included under “Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Retirement Income and Investments.”

 

     As of or for the years ended
December 31,


(Dollar amounts in millions)


   2005

   2004

   2003

Revenues

                    

Spread-based retail products

   $ 2,224    $ 2,712    $ 3,122

Spread-based institutional products

     442      332      346

Fee-based products

     246      317      335
    

  

  

Total revenues

   $ 2,912    $ 3,361    $ 3,803
    

  

  

Segment net earnings

                    

Spread-based retail products

   $ 151    $ 79    $ 109

Spread-based institutional products

     37      30      29

Fee-based products

     59      44      13
    

  

  

Total segment net earnings

   $ 247    $ 153    $ 151
    

  

  

Total segment assets

   $ 58,281    $ 56,610    $ 55,614
    

  

  

 

Products

 

Spread-based retail products

 

Fixed annuities

 

We offer fixed single premium deferred annuities, or SPDAs, which provide for a single premium payment at time of issue, an accumulation period and an annuity payout period at some future date. During the accumulation period, we credit the account value of the annuity with interest earned at an interest rate, called the crediting rate. The crediting rate is guaranteed generally for one year but may be guaranteed for up to seven years, at the contractholders’ option, and thereafter is subject to annual changes at our discretion, based upon competitive factors, prevailing market rates and product profitability. Each contract also has a minimum guaranteed crediting rate. Our fixed annuity contracts are funded by our general account, and the accrual of

 

18


Table of Contents

interest during the accumulation period is generally on a tax-deferred basis to the owner. The majority of our fixed annuity contractholders retain their contracts for 5 to 10 years. After the period specified in the annuity contract, the contractholder may elect to take the proceeds of the annuity as a single payment or over time.

 

Our fixed annuity contracts permit the contractholder at any time during the accumulation period to withdraw all or part of the premiums paid, plus the amount credited to his account, subject to contract provisions such as surrender charges that vary depending upon the terms of the product. The contracts impose surrender charges that typically vary from 5.0% to 9.0% of the account value, starting in the year of deposit and decreasing to zero over a 5- to 9-year period. The contractholder also may withdraw annually up to 10% of the account value without any contractual penalty. Approximately $11.9 billion, or 77% of the total account value of our fixed annuities as of December 31, 2005, were subject to surrender charges.

 

At least once each month, we set an interest crediting rate for newly issued fixed SPDAs and additional deposits. We maintain the initial crediting rate for a minimum period of one year or the guarantee period, whichever is longer. Thereafter, we may adjust the crediting rate no more frequently than once per year for any given deposit. Our recently issued annuity contracts have minimum guaranteed crediting rates between 1.5% and 3.0%.

 

Fixed immediate annuities

 

In exchange for a single premium, fixed immediate annuities provide a fixed amount of income for either a defined number of years, the annuitant’s lifetime, or the greater of the two periods. Income can be paid monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually and generally begins within one year of receipt of the premium. Fixed immediate annuities also include annuitizations chosen as a settlement option for an existing deferred annuity contract.

 

Our fixed immediate annuities differ from deferred annuities in that they provide for contractually guaranteed payments that begin within one year of issue. Fixed immediate annuities do not provide for surrender or policy loans by the contractholder, and therefore they provide us with the opportunity to match closely the underlying investment of the deposit received to the cash benefits to be paid under a policy and provide for an anticipated margin for expenses and profit, subject to credit, reinvestment and, in some cases, mortality risk.

 

The two most common types of fixed immediate annuities are the life-contingent annuity, which makes payments for the life of a contractholder, and the joint and survivor annuity, which continues to make payments to a second contractholder, such as a spouse, after the death of the contractholder. We also offer period certain annuities, which generally make payments for a minimum period from 5 to 30 years even if the contractholder dies within the term certain period. Fixed immediate annuities typically are sold to contractholders approaching retirement. We anticipate higher sales of fixed immediate annuities with the demographic shift toward more people reaching retirement age and focusing on their need for dependable retirement income.

 

Structured settlements

 

Structured settlement contracts provide an alternative to a lump sum settlement, generally in a personal injury lawsuit or workers compensation claim, and typically are purchased by property and casualty insurance companies for the benefit of an injured claimant. The structured settlements provide scheduled payments over a fixed period or, in the case of a life-contingent structured settlement, for the life of the claimant with a guaranteed minimum period of payments. Structured settlement contracts also may provide for irregularly scheduled payments to coincide with anticipated medical or other claimant needs. These settlements offer tax-advantaged, long-range financial security to the injured party and facilitate claim settlement for the property and casualty insurance carrier. Structured settlement contracts are long-term in nature, guarantee a fixed benefit stream and generally do not permit surrender or borrowing against the amounts outstanding under the contract.

 

Prior to the completion of the IPO, we ceded all of our in-force structured settlements business to Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company (“UFLIC”). We continue to write structured settlements selectively when we believe we will be able to achieve our targeted returns, capitalizing on our experience and relationships in this product.

 

19


Table of Contents

Spread-based institutional products

 

We offer GICs and funding agreements (including those issued pursuant to our registered notes program) which are deposit-type products that pay a guaranteed return to the contractholder on specified dates. GICs are purchased by ERISA qualified plans, including pension and 401(k) plans. Funding agreements are purchased by institutional accredited investors for various kinds of funds and accounts that are not ERISA qualified. Purchasers of funding agreements include money market funds, bank common trust funds and other corporate and trust accounts and private investors including Genworth Global Funding Trust as part of our registered notes program.

 

Substantially all our GICs allow for the payment of benefits at contract value (on a pro-rata basis as to plan participants) to ERISA plan participants prior to contract maturity in the event of death, disability, retirement or change in investment election. We carefully underwrite these risks before issuing a GIC to a plan and historically have been able to effectively manage our exposure to these benefit payments. Our GICs typically credit interest at a fixed interest rate and have a fixed maturity generally ranging from two to six years.

 

Our funding agreements generally credit interest on deposits at a floating rate tied to an external market index. To hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, we invest the proceeds backing floating-rate funding agreements in floating-rate assets. Some of our funding agreements are purchased by money market funds, bank common trust funds and other short-term investors. These funding agreements typically are renewed annually, and generally contain “put” provisions, through which the contractholder has an option to terminate the funding agreement for any reason after giving notice within the contract’s specified notice period, which is generally 90-180 days. As of December 31, 2005, we had an aggregate of $2.7 billion of floating-rate funding agreements outstanding, compared to $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2004. Of the $2.7 billion aggregate amount outstanding as of December 31, 2005, $1.0 billion had put option features, including $558 million with put option features of 90 days and the remaining $450 million with put option features of 180 days.

 

We also issue funding agreements to trust accounts to back medium-term notes purchased by investors. These contracts typically are issued for terms of one to seven years. As of December 31, 2005, we had an aggregate of $3.9 billion of these funding agreements, compared to $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2004. Of the $3.9 billion of these funding agreements outstanding as of December 31, 2005, $0.4 billion permitted early termination provisions upon twelve months notice and $0.7 billion permit early termination upon twenty-one months’ notice. The remainder of these funding agreements did not permit early termination.

 

Fee-based products

 

Variable annuities

 

We offer variable annuities that allow the contractholder to make payments into a separate account that is divided into subaccounts that invest in underlying mutual funds. The contractholder also has an option to make allocations to a guaranteed interest-rate account that is a part of our general account. All allocations are determined by the contractholder. Like a deferred fixed annuity, a deferred variable annuity has an accumulation period and a payout period. The main difference between our fixed annuity products and our variable annuity products is that the variable annuities allow the contractholder to allocate all or a portion of his account value to separate accounts that invest in investment accounts that are distinct from our general account. Assets allocated to each separate account have subaccounts that track the performance of selected mutual funds. There is no guaranteed minimum rate of return in these subaccounts, and the contractholder bears the entire risk associated with the performance of these subaccounts. Some of our variable annuities also permit the contractholder to allocate all or a portion of his account value to our general account, in which case we credit interest at specified rates, subject to certain guaranteed minimums.

 

Similar to our fixed annuities, our variable annuity contracts permit the contractholder to withdraw all or part of the premiums paid, plus the amount credited to his account, subject to contract terms such as surrender charges. The cash surrender value of a variable annuity contract depends upon the value of the assets that have been allocated to the contract, how long those assets have been in the contract and the investment performance of the subaccounts that invest in the mutual funds to which the contractholder has allocated assets.

 

20


Table of Contents

Variable annuities provide us with fee-based revenue in the form of expense charges and, in some cases, mortality charges. The fees equal a percentage of the contractholder’s assets in the separate account and typically range from 1.45% to 1.70% per annum. We also receive fees charged on assets allocated to our separate account to cover administrative costs and, in some cases, a distribution fee from the underlying mutual funds in which assets are invested.

 

Our variable annuity contracts provide a basic guaranteed minimum death benefit, or GMDB, which provides a minimum account value to be paid upon the annuitant’s death. Contractholders also have the option to purchase through riders, at an additional charge, enhanced death benefits. Assuming every annuitant died on December 31, 2005, as of that date, contracts with death benefit features not covered by reinsurance had an account value of $2.1 billion and a related death benefit exposure of $8 million net amount at risk. In 2003, we raised prices of, and reduced certain benefits under, our newly issued GMDBs. We continue to evaluate our pricing, hedging and reinsurance of GMDB features and intend to change prices as appropriate. In addition, in 2004, we introduced a variable annuity product with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit, or GMWB. This product provides a guaranteed annual withdrawal of a fixed portion of the initial deposit over a fixed period of time, but requires a balanced asset allocation of the contractholder’s separate account deposit. In 2005, we expanded our GMWB lineup by offering a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for the life of the contractholder while maintaining our requirement for a balanced assets allocation of the contractholder’s separate account deposit. GMWB for life is a component of our Income Distribution Series of variable annuity products and riders.

 

With some employers moving away from traditional defined benefit pension plans to 401(k) plans, in October 2005 we responded by introducing ClearCourseSM, a group variable annuity product. The ClearCourseSM product is designed to represent an investment option within a company’s 401(k) retirement plan. It offers participants the ability to build guaranteed retirement income while maintaining liquidity and growth potential. ClearCourseSM provides participants with the ability to access defined benefit-like features within a defined contribution environment. The product is distributed via direct salespeople and through third-party benefits administrators.

 

We continually review potential new variable annuity products and pursue only those where we believe we can achieve targeted returns in light of the risks involved. Unlike several of our competitors, we have not offered variable annuity products with traditional guaranteed minimum income benefits, or GMIBs, or with guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits, or GMABs. Traditional GMIB products guarantee an annuitization value for guaranteed income payments equal to the premium accumulated at a specified minimum appreciation rate for a defined period of time, after which annuity payments commence. GMAB products guarantee a customer’s account value will be no less than the original investment at the end of a specified accumulation period, plus a specified interest rate.

 

Although we do not offer traditional GMIBs or GMABs, we have been able to capitalize on the demand for products with guarantees with our Retirement Answer product. Retirement Answer is a variable deferred annuity that has a minimum 10-year scheduled deposit period for customers who desire guaranteed minimum income streams at the end of an accumulation period. The income stream may exceed the guaranteed minimum based upon the performance of the subaccount investing in the mutual fund underlying the separate accounts. As of December 31, 2005, we had $1.56 billion of lump-sum deposits, collected scheduled periodic deposits, and future scheduled periodic deposits for this product. Based on key product design features, some of which have patents pending, we believe Retirement Answer allows us to provide our customers with a guaranteed income annuity product that mitigates a number of the risks that accompany traditional guaranteed minimum income benefits offered by many of our competitors.

 

Retirement Answer is a component of our Income Distribution Series of variable annuity products and riders. The Income Distribution Series also includes Guaranteed Income Advantage, or GIA, and Principal Protection Advantage, or PPA. GIA is a rider to several of our variable annuity products that provides retirement

 

21


Table of Contents

benefits similar to Retirement Answer which requires contractholders to allocate assets to a specific investment option to obtain the minimum guarantee. PPA requires investment in available balanced funds and/or an approved asset allocation strategy. The Retirement Answer and the GIA require a minimum ten-year accumulation period, and the PPA, which is designed for purchasers nearing retirement, requires only a three-year accumulation period before annuitization.

 

Prior to the completion of the IPO, we ceded our in-force variable annuities business, excluding the Retirement Answer product and a small block of contracts in run-off, to UFLIC.

 

Variable life insurance

 

We offer variable life insurance products that provide insurance coverage through a policy that gives the policyholder flexibility in investment choices and, in some products, in premium payments and coverage amounts. Our variable life products allow the policyholder to allocate all or a portion of his premiums to separate subaccounts that invest in investment accounts that are distinct from our general account. Assets allocated to each separate subaccount track the performance of selected mutual funds. There is no guaranteed minimum rate of return in these subaccounts, and the policyholder bears the entire investment risk associated with the performance of the subaccounts. Some of our variable life insurance products also permit the policyholder to allocate all or a portion of his account value to our general account, in which case we credit interest at specified rates, subject to certain guaranteed minimums, which are comparable to the minimum rates in effect for our fixed annuities.

 

Similar to our variable annuity products, we collect specified mortality and expense charges, fees charged on assets allocated to the separate subaccount to cover administrative services and costs, and a portion of the management fees from the various underlying mutual funds in which the assets are invested. We collect the cost of insurance charges on our variable life insurance products to compensate us for the mortality risk of the guaranteed death benefit, particularly in the early years of the policy when the death benefit is significantly higher than the value of the policyholder’s account.

 

Asset management

 

We offer asset management services to affluent individual investors. Most of our clients for these services have accumulated significant capital, and our principal asset management strategy is to help protect their assets while taking advantage of opportunities for capital appreciation. Our asset management clients are referred to us through financial advisers. We work with these financial advisers to develop portfolios consisting of individual securities, mutual funds and variable annuities designed to meet each client’s particular investment objectives. Our products consist of separately managed accounts, managed mutual funds accounts, and managed variable annuity services. For each of these products, we receive a management fee based upon the amount of assets under management.

 

Separately managed accounts are individually managed client portfolios that we structure based on the client’s needs and investment objectives, with securities recommended by multiple institutional investment advisors according to defined investment strategies. Our clients directly own the securities in their individual portfolios, and we continuously monitor and evaluate each investment advisor and the investment performance in each portfolio. We also offer advisory services to help clients invest in a variety of mutual funds and other securities. By working in cooperation with our clients’ financial advisers, we seek to achieve each client’s investment objectives by selecting the appropriate mutual funds.

 

Our asset management services generally require minimum investments of $50,000. As of December 31, 2005, we managed more than $5.2 billion for more than 19,000 accounts.

 

Our retail broker/dealers have approximately 2,400 affiliated financial professionals, who sell annuity and insurance products, including our proprietary products, as well as third-party mutual funds and other investment

 

22


Table of Contents

products. In connection with these sales, we receive commission and fee income from purchasers, and we pay a portion of the commissions and fees to financial professionals.

 

Prior to the completion of the IPO, we offered a broad range of institutional asset management services to third parties. GE Asset Management Incorporated, or GEAM, provided the portfolio management services for this business, and we provided marketing, sales and support services. We did not acquire the institutional asset management services business from GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc., or GEFAHI, but we will continue to provide services to GEAM and GEFAHI related to this asset management business, including client introduction services, asset retention services and compliance support. GEFAHI has agreed to pay us a fee of up to $10 million per year for four years to provide these services. The fee will be determined based upon the level of third-party assets under the management of GEAM over the four-year term. Unless renewed, this agreement will expire on December 31, 2007.

 

As of January 1, 2004, we entered into three agreements with affiliates of GE to manage a pool of municipal guaranteed investment contracts issued by those affiliates. Pursuant to these agreements, we have agreed to originate GIC liabilities and advise the GE affiliates regarding the investment, administration and management of their assets that support those liabilities. Under two of those agreements, we receive an administration fee of 0.165% per annum of the maximum program size for those GE affiliates, which is $15 billion. The agreements also provide for termination fees in the event of early termination at the option of either affiliate. Under a third agreement with another affiliate, we receive a management fee of 0.10% per annum of the book value of the investment contracts or similar securities issued by this affiliate after January 1, 2003, which was $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2005. The fee we receive on the contracts issued by that affiliate before January 1, 2003 is based upon a pricing arrangement that varies depending upon the maturities of those contracts and that affiliate’s cost of capital. The book value of the contracts issued before January 1, 2003 was $0.9 billion as of December 31, 2005 and is expected to generate a weighted average fee of approximately 0.35% in 2006. We also will receive reimbursement of our operating expenses under each of these agreements. The initial term of each of the three agreements will expire December 31, 2006, and unless terminated at the option of either party, each agreement will automatically renew on January 1 of each year for successive terms of one year.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

We generally do not underwrite individual lives in our annuity products, other than structured settlements and some income annuities. Instead, we price our products based upon our expected investment returns and our expectations for mortality, longevity and persistency for the group of our contractholders as a whole, taking into account mortality improvements in the general population and our historical experience. We price deferred annuities by analyzing longevity and persistency risk, volatility of expected earnings on our assets under management, and the expected time to retirement. We price our GICs using customized pricing models that estimate both expected cash flows and likely variance from those expectations caused by reallocations of assets by plan participants. We price income annuities and structured settlements using our mortality experience and assumptions regarding continued improvement in annuitant longevity, as well as assumptions regarding investment yields at the time of issue and thereafter.

 

Competition

 

We face significant competition in all our Retirement Income and Investments businesses. Many other companies actively compete for sales in our markets, including other major insurers, banks, other financial institutions, mutual fund and money asset management firms and specialty providers. In many of our product lines, we face competition from competitors that have greater market share or breadth of distribution, offer a broader range of products, services or features, assume a greater level of risk, have lower profitability expectations or have higher claims paying ratings than we do. Many competitors offer similar products and use similar distribution channels. The substantial expansion of banks’ and insurance companies’ distribution capacities and expansion of product features in recent years has intensified pressure on margins and production levels and has increased the level of competition in many of our business lines.

 

23


Table of Contents

Mortgage Insurance

 

Overview

 

Through our Mortgage Insurance segment, we offer mortgage insurance in the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, New Zealand, Mexico and Japan. We also are exploring opportunities in Europe, Latin America and Asia.

 

Private mortgage insurance expands homeownership opportunities by enabling borrowers to buy homes with “low-down-payment mortgages,” which are usually defined as loans with a down payment of less than 20% of the home’s value. Low-down-payment mortgages are sometimes also referred to as high loan-to-value mortgages. Mortgage insurance products increase the funds available for residential mortgages by protecting mortgage lenders and investors against loss in the event of a borrower’s default. These products generally also aid financial institutions in managing their capital efficiently by reducing the capital required for low-down-payment mortgages. If a borrower defaults on mortgage payments, private mortgage insurance reduces and, in some instances, eliminates the loss to the insured institution. Private mortgage insurance also facilitates the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary mortgage market.

 

We have been providing mortgage insurance products and services in the U.S. since 1981 and now operate in all 50 states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia. According to Inside Mortgage Finance, in 2005, we were the fifth-largest provider of mortgage insurance in the U.S., based on flow new insurance written. We expanded our operations internationally throughout the 1990s and today we believe we are the largest provider of mortgage insurance outside the U.S. In 2005, we were the leading provider in Australia based upon flow new insurance written and primary insurance in-force, and one of two major insurers in Canada. We are a leading private mortgage insurance provider in Europe, based upon flow new insurance written, and have a growing presence in the developing private mortgage insurance markets in Mexico and Japan. In addition to private mortgage insurance, we provide lenders with various underwriting and other products and services related to home mortgage lending.

 

The following table sets forth selected financial information regarding our U.S. and international mortgage insurance business, as of or for the periods indicated. Additional selected financial information and operating performance measures regarding our Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are included under “Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

     As of or for the years ended
December 31,


(Dollar amounts in millions)


   2005

   2004

   2003

Total revenues

                    

U.S. mortgage insurance

   $ 603    $ 609    $ 665

International mortgage insurance

     611      481      317
    

  

  

Total revenues

   $ 1,214    $ 1,090    $ 982
    

  

  

Segment net earnings

                    

U.S. mortgage insurance

   $ 238    $ 224    $ 225

International mortgage insurance

     269      202      144
    

  

  

Total segment net earnings

   $ 507    $ 426    $ 369
    

  

  

Total segment assets

   $ 7,118    $ 6,428    $ 6,110
    

  

  

 

24


Table of Contents

U.S. mortgage insurance

 

Overview

 

The U.S. private mortgage insurance industry is defined in large part by the requirements and practices of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other large mortgage investors. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchase residential mortgages from mortgage lenders and investors, as part of their governmental mandate to provide liquidity in the secondary mortgage market. For the first nine months of 2005, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased approximately 28.1% of all the mortgage loans originated in the U.S., as compared to 36.1% for 2004, according to statistics published by Inside the GSEs. We believe the significant reduction in the percentage of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has reduced the market size for flow private mortgage insurance. Mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac totaled more than $3.56 trillion as of December 31, 2005, or approximately 39% of the total outstanding mortgage debt in the U.S. In connection with these activities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also have established mortgage loan origination, documentation, servicing and selling requirements and standards for the loans they purchase. In addition, Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s current eligibility requirements provide that they will accept private mortgage insurance only from insurers that maintain financial strength ratings of at least “AA-” by S&P and “Aa3” by Moody’s. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are “government sponsored enterprises,” and we refer to them as the “GSEs.”

 

The GSEs may purchase mortgages with unpaid principal amounts up to a specified maximum. The maximum single-family principal balance loan limit eligible for purchase by the GSEs is called the “conforming loan limit.” It is currently $417,000 and subject to annual adjustment. Each GSE’s Congressional charter generally prohibits it from purchasing a mortgage where the loan-to-value ratio exceeds 80% of home value unless the portion of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage which is in excess of 80% of the value of the property securing the mortgage is protected against default by lender recourse, participation or by a qualified insurer. As a result, high loan-to-value mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac generally are insured with private mortgage insurance. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased the majority of the flow loans we insured as of December 31, 2005.

 

The majority of our U.S. mortgage insurance policies provide default loss protection on a portion (typically 10%-40%) of the balance of an individual mortgage loan. Most of our primary mortgage insurance policies are “flow” insurance policies, which cover individual loans at the time the loan is originated. We also enter into “bulk” transactions with lenders and investors in selected instances, under which we insure a portfolio of loans for a negotiated price. Bulk insurance constituted less than 2% of our new risk written for each of the years ended December 2005, 2004 and 2003.

 

In addition to flow and bulk primary mortgage insurance business, we have written mortgage insurance on a pool basis. Under pool insurance, the mortgage insurer provides coverage on a group of specified loans, typically for 100% of all losses on every loan in the portfolio, subject to an agreed aggregate loss limit.

 

Products and services

 

Primary mortgage insurance

 

Flow insurance. Flow insurance is primary mortgage insurance placed on an individual loan when the loan is originated. Our primary mortgage insurance covers default risk on first mortgage loans generally secured by one- to four-unit residential properties, and can be used to protect mortgage lenders and investors from default on any type of residential mortgage loan instrument that we have approved. Our insurance covers a specified coverage percentage of a “claim amount” consisting of unpaid loan principal, delinquent interest and certain expenses associated with the default and subsequent foreclosure. As the insurer, we generally are required to pay the coverage percentage of a claim amount specified in the primary policy, but we also have the option to pay the lender an amount equal to the unpaid loan principal, delinquent interest and certain expenses incurred with the default and foreclosure, and acquire title to the property. In addition, the claim amount may be reduced or

 

25


Table of Contents

eliminated if the loss on the defaulted loan is reduced as a result of the lender’s disposition of the property. The lender selects the coverage percentage at the time the loan is originated, often to comply with investor requirements to reduce the loss exposure on loans purchased by the investor.

 

For a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, the most common mortgage product in the U.S., the GSEs generally require coverage percentages of 35% for loan-to-value ratios, determined at loan origination, of greater than 95.00%, 30% for loan-to-value ratios of 90.01%-95.00%, 25% for loan-to-value ratios of 85.01%-90.00% and 12% for loan-to-value ratios of 80.01%-85.00%. However, the GSEs may alter their coverage requirements and propose different product structures, and we also offer a range of other mortgage insurance products that provide greater or lesser coverage amounts.

 

The borrower’s mortgage loan instrument generally requires the borrower to pay the mortgage insurance premium. In other cases, no insurance requirement is imposed upon the borrower, in which case the lender pays the premium and recovers those payments through the interest rate charged on the mortgage. Our mortgage insurance premiums for flow insurance typically are paid monthly, with more than 97% of flow new insurance written during each of the last three years paid monthly, but premiums also may be paid annually or in a single, lump-sum payment.

 

We are not permitted to terminate our mortgage insurance coverage in-force, except for non-payment of premium or material breach of policy conditions. The insurance remains renewable at the option of the policyholder, usually at the renewal rate fixed when the loan was initially insured. As a result, we are not able to raise prices on existing policies to respond to unanticipated default patterns. In addition, our policyholders may cancel their insurance at any time at their option, including when a mortgage is repaid, which may be accelerated by mortgage refinancings in times of falling interest rates. Cancellations are primarily driven by the prevailing interest rate environment, home price appreciation trends and the cancellation policies of the GSEs and other investors.

 

Under the U.S. Homeowners Protection Act, or the HPA, a borrower generally has the right to terminate private mortgage insurance coverage on loans closed after July 28, 1999 secured by a single-dwelling property that is the borrower’s primary residence when certain loan-to-value ratio thresholds are met. In general, a borrower may stop making mortgage insurance payments when the loan-to-value ratio is scheduled to reach 80% (based upon the loan’s amortization schedule established at loan origination) if the borrower so requests and if certain requirements relating to the borrower’s payment history and the property’s value since origination are satisfied. In addition, a borrower’s obligation to make payments for private mortgage insurance generally terminates regardless of whether a borrower so requests when the loan-to-value ratio reaches 78% of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage. Some states require mortgage servicers to notify borrowers periodically of the circumstances in which they may request a mortgage servicer to cancel private mortgage insurance. Some states allow the borrower to request that the mortgage servicer cancel private mortgage insurance or require the mortgage servicer to cancel such insurance automatically when the circumstances permitting cancellation occur.

 

The level of new mortgage originations in the U.S. was $3,120 billion and $2,920 billion for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This compares to $3,945 billion of new mortgage originations for the year ended December 31, 2003. We believe the decrease in mortgage originations since 2003 was principally driven by two factors. First, increasing interest rates in 2004 and 2005 made refinancing of existing mortgages less attractive to consumers than in prior years. Second, with historically low interest rates in 2002 and 2003, many mortgages for which refinancing would otherwise have been economically attractive were already refinanced. As a result, our U.S. flow persistency increased from 46% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 65% for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. Continued interest rate increases may have a favorable impact on persistency and could have an adverse impact on new mortgage originations. If home price appreciation slows, policy cancellations may decline, which would positively affect our U.S. flow persistency rate.

 

26


Table of Contents

We continue to develop innovative mortgage insurance products that are designed to attract first-time home buyers and expand the scope of the traditional mortgage insurance market. For example, we have launched our HomeOpeners® products: MonthlyPlus, PaymentPlus and LenderPlus. Our MonthlyPlus product combines a mortgage insurance policy with involuntary unemployment coverage on mortgage payments for a specified period of time in the event of involuntary job loss or accidental death. Our PaymentPlus and LenderPlus products are designed to compete with simultaneous second mortgages, as described below under “—Competition—Mortgage lenders and other investors.”

 

Bulk insurance

 

Under our primary bulk insurance, we insure a portfolio of loans in a single, bulk transaction. Generally, in our bulk insurance, the individual loans in the insured portfolio are insured to specified levels of coverage, and there is an aggregate loss limit applicable to all of the insured loans. We base the premium on our bulk insurance upon our evaluation of the overall risk of the insured loans included in a transaction, and we negotiate the premium directly with the securitizer or other owner of the loans. Most of our bulk insurance business through 2005 has related to loans financed by lenders who participate in the mortgage programs sponsored by the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”). In addition to the FHLB business, we also participate in Alt A programs with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac where we believe we will be able to achieve our target returns. Premiums for bulk transactions generally are paid monthly by lenders or investors or a securitization vehicle in connection with a securitization transaction or the sale of a loan portfolio.

 

The loans we insure in bulk transactions typically consist of prime credit-quality loans with loan-to-value ratios of 50% to 95%. We generally have avoided the sub-prime segments of the market, because we believe market pricing for mortgage insurance on sub-prime bulk transactions has not been adequate and we have had concerns regarding the volatility of this segment. However, we may consider insuring such loans where we believe we will be able to achieve our target returns. Loans that we insure in bulk transactions with loan-to-value ratios above 80% typically have primary mortgage insurance on a flow basis, written either by us or another private mortgage insurer. Our mortgage insurance coverage levels in bulk transactions typically range from 10% to 40%.

 

Pool insurance

 

In addition to our flow and bulk primary mortgage insurance, we previously have written mortgage insurance on a pool basis. Pool insurance generally is used as an additional credit enhancement for secondary market mortgage transactions. We ceased writing pool insurance in 1993 because of relatively high losses on pool policies, resulting primarily from inadequate pricing, loss severity and risk concentration in certain parts of the country. However in 2005, we began writing pool insurance for state housing finance agencies where we believe we will be able to achieve our target returns.

 

Our pool insurance in-force, which relates primarily to policies written between 1990 and 1993, generally covers the loss on a defaulted mortgage loan that exceeds either the claim payment under the primary coverage (if primary insurance is required on that loan) or the total loss (if that loan does not require primary insurance), in each case up to a stated aggregate loss limit. Mortgage loans we insured in pool insurance with loan-to-value ratios above 80% typically are covered by flow mortgage insurance, written either by us or another private mortgage insurer.

 

Contract underwriting services

 

We perform fee-based contract underwriting services for mortgage lenders. Historically, lenders and mortgage insurers each maintained underwriting staffs and performed separate, and in many ways duplicative, underwriting activities with respect to each mortgage loan. Over time, lenders and mortgage insurers have developed a number of arrangements designed to eliminate those inefficiencies. The provision of underwriting services by mortgage insurers serves this purpose and speeds the approval process.

 

27


Table of Contents

The principal contract underwriting service we provide is determining whether the data relating to a borrower and a proposed loan contained in a mortgage loan application file complies with the lender’s loan underwriting guidelines or the investor’s loan purchase requirements. In connection with that service, we also compile the application data and submit it to the automated underwriting systems of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which independently analyze the data to determine if the proposed loan complies with their investor requirements. If the loan being reviewed requires mortgage insurance under the applicable lender or investor criteria, we also underwrite the loan to our mortgage insurance guidelines and issue the appropriate mortgage insurance coverage. We believe our contract underwriting services appeal to mortgage lenders because they enable lenders to reduce their costs and improve their operating efficiencies.

 

Under the terms of our contract underwriting agreements, we agree to indemnify the lender against losses incurred in the event we make material errors in determining whether loans processed by our contract underwriters meet specified underwriting or purchase criteria, subject to contractual limitations on liability.

 

New risk written by our contract underwriters represented 24% of our new risk written for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to 24% and 23% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

Captive reinsurance

 

Captive reinsurance is a reinsurance program in which we share portions of our U.S. mortgage insurance risk written on loans originated or purchased by lenders with captive reinsurance companies, or captive reinsurers, affiliated with these lenders. In return, we cede to the captive reinsurers an agreed portion of our gross premiums on flow insurance written. New insurance written through the bulk channel generally is not subject to these arrangements.

 

The following table sets forth selected financial information regarding our captive reinsurance arrangements, as of or for the periods indicated:

 

     As of or for the years ended
December 31,


 
     2005

    2004

    2003

 

Primary risk in-force subject to captive reinsurance arrangements, as a percentage of total primary risk in-force

   65 %   66 %   64 %

Gross written premiums ceded pursuant to captive reinsurance arrangements, as a percentage of total gross written premiums

   24 %   24 %   23 %

Primary new risk written subject to captive reinsurance arrangements, as a percentage of total primary new risk written

   61 %   70 %   75 %

 

Customers

 

Our principal mortgage insurance customers are originators of residential mortgage loans, such as mortgage banks, savings institutions, commercial banks, mortgage brokers, credit unions and other lenders, who typically determine which mortgage insurer or insurers they will use for the placement of mortgage insurance written on loans they originate. To obtain primary insurance written on a flow basis, a mortgage lender must first apply for and receive from us a mortgage guaranty master policy. In recent years, there has been significant consolidation among the largest lenders, which now underwrite a substantial portion of all the mortgages written in the U.S. Our top ten lenders accounted for an aggregate of 36% of our flow new insurance written for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

We are focused on expanding our presence throughout the mortgage loan market by providing superior customer sales support, product offerings designed to meet the specific needs of our customers, and technology products designed to enable customers to reduce costs and expand revenues. In addition, as discussed under

 

28


Table of Contents

“—Operations and Technology,” we have developed web-based technology services that enable our customers to interact more efficiently with us.

 

Underwriting and pricing

 

Loan applications for all loans we insure are reviewed to evaluate each individual borrower’s credit strength and history, the characteristics of the loan and the value of the underlying property. This analysis generally includes reviewing the following criteria:

 

    the borrower’s credit strength and history, as reported by credit reporting agencies;

 

    the borrower’s debt-to-income ratios where income is disclosed;

 

    the loan-to-value ratio;

 

    the type of mortgage instrument;

 

    the purpose of the loan;

 

    the type of property; and

 

    appraisals to confirm the property market value is fairly stated.

 

Loan applications for primary mortgage insurance are reviewed by our employees directly as part of our traditional underwriting process or by our contract underwriters as we process mortgage loan applications requiring mortgage insurance. Some mortgage lenders also underwrite loan applications for mortgage insurance under a delegated underwriting program, in which we permit approved lenders to commit us to insure loans using underwriting guidelines we have previously approved. Before granting a lender delegated underwriting authority, our risk management personnel review the lender’s underwriting experience and processes, loan quality and specific loan programs to be included in the delegated program. In addition, we conduct audits on a sample of the delegated loans we insure to confirm that lenders with delegated authority adhere to approved underwriting guidelines and procedures.

 

The majority of mortgage loans we insure today are underwritten using Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s automated underwriting systems, or AUS, which lenders have widely adopted due to the GSEs’ requirements and the efficiencies that AUS provide. We have evaluated loans approved by Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s AUS and, like other mortgage insurers, we generally have agreed to insure loans approved by these systems. Under the delegated underwriting program, lenders may use their own AUS provided we have reviewed and approved their system. AUS have automated many of the underwriting steps that were previously performed by underwriters on a manual basis and use sophisticated mortgage scoring methodologies to evaluate borrower default risk. Although we review AUS before allowing their use under our delegated program, under which lenders have the responsibility to determine whether the loans comply with our approved underwriting guidelines, a potential risk to us of using AUS is factors we might otherwise evaluate in making an underwriting decision are not considered if not required by AUS.

 

Loans insured under our delegated underwriting program accounted for approximately 60% of our total risk in-force as of December 31, 2005, compared to 59% as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The percentage of new risk written by delegated underwriters was 61% for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to 58% and 62% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

In pricing mortgage insurance policies, we generally target substantially similar returns on capital regardless of the loan-to-value ratio, product type and depth of coverage. We establish premium rates principally on the basis of long-term claims experience in the industry, reflecting periods of lower and higher losses and various regional economic downturns. We believe over the long term each region of the U.S. will be subject to similar factors affecting risk of loss on insurance written, and, therefore, we generally use a nationally based premium rate policy,

 

29


Table of Contents

rather than a regional, local or lender-based policy. Our premium rates vary with the coverage percentage and the perceived risk of a claim on the insured loan, which takes into account the loan-to-value ratio, the type of mortgage and the term of the mortgage. Our premium rates also reflect our expectations, based upon our analysis of historical data, of the persistency of the policies in our book of business. Our premium rates also take into account competitive alternatives available to consumers, including rates offered by other mortgage insurers.

 

For a certain number of our products, our premium rates do vary based on the location of the borrower’s credit score within a range of credit scores. In accordance with industry practice, we use the “FICO” score as one indicator of a borrower’s credit quality. Fair Isaac and Company, or “FICO,” developed the “FICO” credit scoring model to calculate a FICO score based upon a borrower’s credit history. The higher the credit score, the lower the likelihood that a borrower will default on a loan. FICO credit scores range up to 850, with a score of 620 or more generally viewed as a “prime” loan and a score below 620 generally viewed as a “sub-prime” loan. “A minus” loans generally are loans where the borrowers have FICO credit scores between 575 and 660, and where the borrower has a blemished credit history. Some of our products require a minimum FICO score and/or have rates based on FICO scores. As of December 31, 2005, on a risk in-force basis, approximately 92% of our flow insurance loans had FICO credit scores of at least 620, approximately 6% had FICO credit scores between 575 and 619, and approximately 2% had FICO scores of 574 or less.

 

As of December 31, 2005, on a risk in-force basis, approximately 96% of our bulk insurance loans had FICO credit scores of at least 620, approximately 2% had FICO credit scores between 575 and 619, and approximately 2% had FICO scores of 574 or less. The majority of loans we currently insure in bulk transactions meet the conforming loan limit and have FICO credit scores of at least 620. After 2001, we significantly reduced writing insurance of loans in bulk transactions that included non-conforming and lesser-quality loans, such as “A minus” loans and “sub-prime” loans, because we believe market pricing was inadequate to compensate us for the risk.

 

We also provide mortgage insurance for “Alt A” loans, which are originated under programs in which there is a reduced level of verification or disclosure of the borrower’s income or assets. For an Alt A loan, the borrower’s credit strength and history and the appraised value of the property are carefully reviewed. We also impose limitations on Alt A loans, including limitations with respect to the purpose of the loan and the type of property. Alt A loans represented 5.1%, 2.8% and 1.9% of our risk in-force as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

We also provide insurance for loans with an initial “Interest Only” payment option. The Interest Only payment option allows the borrower flexibility to pay interest only, or to pay interest and as much principal as desired, during an initial period of time. We impose credit score, occupancy type and loan-to-value restrictions on these loans. Interest Only loans represented 3.3% of our U.S. risk in-force as of December 31, 2005 and 1.0% or less as of December 31, 2004 and prior.

 

30


Table of Contents

Loan portfolio

 

The following table sets forth selected financial information regarding our U.S. primary mortgage insurance loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   2005

   2004

   2003

Primary risk-in-force lender concentration (by original applicant)

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805

Top 10 lenders

     8,608      9,755      12,047

Top 20 lenders

     10,983      11,938      14,392

Loan-to-value ratio

                    

95.01% and above

   $ 4,105    $ 3,601    $ 3,431

90.01% to 95.00%

     8,362      9,450      10,759

80.01% to 90.00%

     8,859      9,555      10,868

80.00% and below

     412      363      747
    

  

  

Total

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805
    

  

  

Loan grade

                    

Prime

   $ 19,482    $ 20,704    $ 23,408

A minus and sub-prime

     2,256      2,265      2,397
    

  

  

Total

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805
    

  

  

Loan type(1)

                    

Fixed rate mortgage

   $ 20,325    $ 21,492    $ 24,354

Adjustable rate mortgage

     1,413      1,477      1,451
    

  

  

Total

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805
    

  

  

Type of documentation

                    

Alt A

   $ 1,104    $ 633    $ 503

Standard

     20,634      22,336      25,302
    

  

  

Total

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805
    

  

  

Mortgage term

                    

15 years and under

   $ 737    $ 1,163    $ 1,489

More than 15 years

     21,001      21,806      24,316
    

  

  

Total

   $ 21,738    $ 22,969    $ 25,805
    

  

  


(1) For loan type in this table, any loan with an interest rate that is fixed for an initial term of five years or more is categorized as a fixed rate mortgage.

 

Loans in default and claims

 

Our default management process begins with notification by the loan servicer of a default on an insured loan. “Default” is defined in our master policies as the borrower’s failure to pay when due an amount equal to the scheduled monthly mortgage payment under the terms of the mortgage. Generally, the master policies require an insured to notify us of a default no later than ten days after the borrower has been in default by three monthly payments. In most cases, however, defaults are reported earlier. We generally consider a loan to be in default and establish reserves if the borrower has failed to make a required mortgage payment for two consecutive months. Borrowers default for a variety of reasons, including a reduction of income, unemployment, divorce, illness, inability to manage credit and interest rate levels. Borrowers may cure defaults by making all of the delinquent loan payments or by selling the property in full satisfaction of all amounts due under the mortgage. In most cases, defaults that are not cured result in a claim under our policy.

 

31


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of loans in default and the default rate for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

    2003

 

Primary Insurance

                  

Insured loans in-force

   744,970     830,688     950,157  

Loans in default

   27,391     28,467     32,207  

Percentage of loans in default (default rate)

   3.7 %   3.4 %   3.4 %

Flow loans in-force

   643,954     719,533     839,891  

Flow loans in default

   26,163     26,737     29,787  

Percentage of flow loans in default (default rate)

   4.1 %   3.7 %   3.5 %

Bulk loans in-force

   101,016     111,155     110,266  

Bulk loans in default

   1,228     1,730     2,420  

Percentage of bulk loans in default (default rate)

   1.2 %   1.6 %   2.2 %

A minus and sub-prime loans in-force

   67,514     69,817     75,584  

A minus and sub-prime loans in default

   7,072     7,068     6,881  

Percentage of A minus and sub-prime loans in default (default rate)

   10.5 %   10.1 %   9.1 %

Pool Insurance

                  

Insured loans in-force

   19,524     25,303     37,702  

Loans in default

   597     777     855  

Percentage of loans in default (default rate)

   3.1 %   3.1 %   2.3 %

 

Primary insurance default rates differ from region to region in the U.S. at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. The two tables below set forth our primary default rates for the various regions of the U.S. and the ten largest states by our risk in-force as of December 31, 2005. Default rates are shown by region based upon location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender. We believe that increases in the 2005 default rates for the South Central and Southeast regions reflect increased delinquencies associated with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. However, this did not have a material impact to our 2005 results of operations.

 

    

Percent of primary

risk in-

force as of

December 31,

2005


   

Default rate

December 31,


 
     2005

    2004

    2003

 

U.S. Regions

                        

Southeast(1)

   25 %   4.03 %   3.87 %   3.59 %

South Central(2)

   17     4.91 %   3.82 %   3.65 %

Northeast(3)

   14     3.66 %   3.79 %   3.88 %

North Central(4)

   12     2.84 %   2.80 %   2.71 %

Great Lakes(5)

   9     4.96 %   4.61 %   4.33 %

Pacific(6)

   9     1.79 %   2.11 %   2.54 %

Plains(7)

   6     2.60 %   2.57 %   2.54 %

Mid-Atlantic(8)

   4     2.52 %   2.85 %   2.94 %

New England(9)

   4     2.56 %   2.46 %   2.79 %
    

                 

Total

   100 %   3.68 %   3.43 %   3.38 %
    

                 

(1) Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.
(2) Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.
(3) New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.
(4) Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin.
(5) Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio.
(6) Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
(7) Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.
(8) Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington, D.C. and West Virginia.
(9) Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.

 

32


Table of Contents
    

Percent of primary

risk in-

force as of

December 31,

2005


    Default Rate
December 31,


 
     2005

    2004

    2003

 

Florida

   8.92 %   2.43 %   2.80 %   2.75 %

Texas

   7.14 %   5.09 %   4.70 %   4.15 %

New York

   6.26 %   2.87 %   3.06 %   3.47 %

Illinois

   5.44 %   3.16 %   3.26 %   3.23 %

Georgia

   4.23 %   4.51 %   4.92 %   4.68 %

North Carolina

   4.05 %   4.51 %   4.33 %   4.12 %

Pennsylvania

   3.85 %   4.83 %   4.79 %   4.38 %

Ohio

   3.66 %   5.40 %   5.13 %   4.64 %

New Jersey

   3.47 %   3.36 %   3.52 %   3.89 %

California

   3.27 %   1.14 %   1.39 %   1.91 %

 

Claim activity is not spread evenly throughout the coverage period of a primary insurance book of business. Based upon our experience, the majority of claims on primary mortgage insurance loans occur in the third through seventh years after loan origination, and relatively few claims are paid during the first two years after loan origination. Primary insurance written from the period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002 represented 18% of our primary insurance in-force as of December 31, 2005. This portion of our loan portfolio is in its expected peak claim period with respect to traditional primary loans. We believe our “A minus” and “sub-prime” loans will have earlier incidences of default than our prime loans. “A minus” loans represented 4.8% and 4.4% of our primary risk in-force as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and “sub-prime” loans represented 5.6% and 5.5% of our primary risk in-force as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

The following table sets forth the dispersion of our primary insurance in-force and risk in-force as of December 31, 2005, by year of policy origination and average annual mortgage interest rate since we began operations in 1981:

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


  

Average

rate


   

Primary

insurance

in-force


  

Percent

of total


   

Primary

risk in-

force


  

Percent

of total


 

Policy Year


            

1996 and Prior

   8.18 %   $ 3,086    3.08 %   $ 739    3.40 %

1997

   7.83 %     543    0.54       147    0.67  

1998

   7.12 %     1,496    1.49       383    1.76  

1999

   7.24 %     1,727    1.72       430    1.98  

2000

   8.15 %     1,046    1.04       258    1.19  

2001

   7.38 %     3,982    3.98       964    4.43  

2002

   6.54 %     9,713    9.69       2,314    10.65  

2003

   5.62 %     34,681    34.60       6,234    28.68  

2004

   5.80 %     19,411    19.37       4,286    19.72  

2005

   5.97 %     24,545    24.49       5,983    27.52  
          

  

 

  

Total portfolio

   6.19 %   $ 100,230    100.00 %   $ 21,738    100.00 %
          

  

 

  

 

Primary mortgage insurance claims paid, including loss adjustment expenses, or LAE, for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $145 million, compared to $146 million and $117 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Pool insurance claims paid were $1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

 

The frequency of defaults may not correlate directly with the number of claims received because the rate at which defaults are cured is influenced by borrowers’ financial resources and circumstances and regional economic differences. Whether an uncured default leads to a claim principally depends upon the borrower’s

 

33


Table of Contents

equity at the time of default and the borrower’s or the insured’s ability to sell the home for an amount sufficient to satisfy all amounts due under the mortgage loan. When we receive notice of a default, we use a proprietary model to determine whether a delinquent loan is a candidate for work out. When the model identifies such a candidate, our loan workout specialists prioritize cases for loss mitigation based upon the likelihood that the loan will result in a claim. Loss mitigation actions include loan modification, extension of credit to bring a loan current, foreclosure forbearance, pre-foreclosure sale, and deed-in-lieu. These loss mitigation efforts often are an effective way to reduce our claim exposure and ultimate payouts.

 

Our policies require the insured to file a claim with us, specifying the claim amount (unpaid principal, interest and expenses), no later than 60 days after it has acquired title to the underlying property, usually through foreclosure. The claim amount is subject to our review and possible adjustment. Depending upon the applicable state foreclosure law, an average of approximately 18 months elapse from the date of default to the filing of a claim on an uncured default. Our master policies exclude coverage where there is physical damage whether caused by fire, earthquake or other catastrophe, unless the property is restored to its condition at the time the insurance was placed, with reasonable wear and tear excepted.

 

We have the right to rescind coverage and refuse to pay a claim if it is determined that the insured or its agents misrepresented material information in the insurance application. In addition, where loans are underwritten by lenders through our delegated underwriting program, we have the right to rescind coverage if the loan was not underwritten in compliance with our approved guidelines.

 

Within 60 days after a claim and supporting documentation have been filed, we have the option:

 

    to pay the claim amount, multiplied by coverage percentage specified in the certificate of insurance;

 

    in the event the property is sold pursuant to an agreement made prior to payment of the claim, which we refer to as a pre-arranged sale, to pay the lesser of 100% of the claim amount less the proceeds of sale of the property, or the claim amount multiplied by the coverage percentage; or

 

    to pay the lender an amount equal to the unpaid loan principal, delinquent interest and certain expenses incurred with the default and foreclosure, and acquire title to the property. We bear the risk of any loss in connection with the acquisition and sale of the property.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2005, we settled approximately 50% of the primary insurance claims processed for payment on the basis of a pre-arranged sale.

 

The ratio of the claim paid to the current risk in-force for a loan is referred to as “claim severity.” The current aggregate risk in-force is equal to the unpaid principal amount multiplied by the coverage percentage. The main determinants of claim severity are the age of the mortgage loan, the value of the underlying property, accrued interest on the loan, expenses advanced by the insured and foreclosure expenses. These amounts depend partly upon the time required to complete foreclosure, which varies depending upon state laws. Pre-foreclosure sales, acquisitions and other early workout efforts help to reduce overall claim severity. Our average primary mortgage insurance claim severity was 95%, 94% and 93% for the years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

Competition

 

We compete primarily with U.S. and state government agencies, other private mortgage insurers, mortgage lenders and other investors, the GSEs and, potentially, the Federal Home Loan Banks. We also compete, indirectly, with structured transactions in the capital markets and with other financial instruments designed to mitigate credit risk.

 

U.S. and state government agencies. We and other private mortgage insurers compete for flow business directly with U.S. federal and state governmental and quasi-governmental agencies, principally the FHA and, to a lesser degree, the VA. In the aggregate, the FHA and VA had a 23.5% market share in 2005 and a 32.8% market share in 2004, according to information published by Inside Mortgage Finance.

 

34


Table of Contents

Loans insured by the FHA cannot exceed maximum principal amounts that are determined by a percentage of the conforming loan limit. For 2006, the maximum FHA loan amount for homes with one dwelling unit in “high cost” areas is $362,790 and the maximum VA loan amount is $417,000. We and other private mortgage insurers are not limited as to maximum individual loan amounts we can insure.

 

In addition to competition from the FHA and the VA, we and other private mortgage insurers face competition from state-supported mortgage insurance funds in several states, including California, Illinois and New York. From time to time, other state legislatures and agencies consider expansions of the authority of their state governments to insure residential mortgages.

 

Government entities with which we compete typically do not have the same capital requirements and do not have the same profit objectives as we do. Although private companies establish pricing terms for their products to achieve targeted returns, these government entities may offer products on terms designed to accomplish social or political objectives or reflect other non-economic goals.

 

Private mortgage insurers. The private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. The private mortgage insurance industry currently consists of seven mortgage insurers plus our company.

 

Mortgage lenders and other investors. We and other mortgage insurers compete with transactions structured by mortgage lenders to avoid mortgage insurance on low-down-payment mortgage loans. These transactions include self-insuring and simultaneous second loans, which separate a mortgage with a loan-to-value ratio of more than 80%, which generally would require mortgage insurance, into two loans, a first mortgage with a loan to-value-ratio of 80% and a simultaneous second mortgage for the excess portion of the loan. Simultaneous second loans are also often known as “80-10-10 loans,” because they often comprise a first mortgage with an 80% loan-to-value ratio, a second mortgage with a 10% loan-to-value ratio and the remaining 10% paid in cash by the buyer, rather than a single mortgage with a 90% loan-to-value ratio. However, simultaneous seconds also can be structured as 80-15-5 loans or 80-20-0 loans, as well as other configurations.

 

Over the past several years, we believe the volume of simultaneous second loans as an alternative to loans requiring private mortgage insurance has increased substantially. We believe this recent increase reflects the following factors:

 

    the lower cost of simultaneous second loans compared to the cost of mortgage insurance, due to the current low-interest-rate environment and the emerging popularity of 15- and 30-year amortizing and adjustable rate simultaneous seconds;

 

    the fact that second mortgage interest is generally tax-deductible, whereas mortgage insurance payments currently are not tax-deductible (although from time to time there have been proposed legislative initiatives to permit deductions for mortgage insurance payments);

 

    negative consumer, broker and realtor perceptions of private mortgage insurance; and

 

    the desire by some investors to hold second mortgages.

 

We are developing mortgage insurance products that seek to enhance the appeal of private mortgage insurance in view of the increasing volume of simultaneous second loans. For example, in 2004, we launched our HomeOpeners® suite of products designed to compete more effectively with simultaneous second loans by offering consumers lower monthly payments, more deductible interest and involuntary job loss protection at no additional cost.

 

Mortgage lenders also may compete with mortgage insurers as a result of legislation that has removed restrictions on affiliations between banks and insurers. The Graham-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 permits the combination of banks, insurers and securities firms under one holding company. This legislation may increase competition by increasing the number, size and financial strength of potential competitors. In addition, mortgage lenders that establish or affiliate with competing mortgage insurers may reduce their purchases of our products.

 

35


Table of Contents

We also compete with structured transactions in the capital markets and with other financial instruments designed to mitigate the risk of mortgage defaults, such as credit default swaps and credit linked notes, with lenders who forego mortgage insurance (self-insure) on loans held in their portfolios, and with mortgage lenders who maintain captive mortgage insurance and reinsurance programs.

 

The GSEs—Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and The Federal Home Loans Banks. As the predominant purchasers of conventional mortgage loans in the U.S., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provide a direct link between mortgage origination and capital markets. As discussed above under “—Primary mortgage insurance,” most high loan-to-value mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac are insured with private mortgage insurance issued by an insurer deemed qualified by the GSEs. Our mortgage insurance company is a qualified insurer with both GSEs. Private mortgage insurers may be subject to competition from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the extent the GSEs are compensated for assuming default risk that would otherwise be insured by the private mortgage insurance industry.

 

The GSEs are currently subject to oversight by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD. In November 2004, HUD announced new GSE mortgage purchase requirements, known as affordable housing goals. Under these goals, which became effective January 1, 2005, the minimum percent of all loans purchased by the GSEs that must support low- and moderate-income home buyers increases annually from 50% in 2004 to 56% in 2008, and the minimum percent of such loans that must be on properties in underserved areas increases annually from 36% in 2004 to 39% in 2008. The GSEs’ goals to expand purchases of affordable housing loans may increase the size of the mortgage insurance market. The GSEs also have expanded programs to include commitments to purchase certain volumes of loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 95%.

 

Private mortgage insurers must satisfy requirements set by the GSEs to be eligible to insure loans sold to the GSEs, and the GSEs have the ability to implement new eligibility requirements for mortgage insurers. They also have the authority to change the pricing arrangements for purchasing retained-participation mortgages as compared to insured mortgages, increase or reduce required mortgage insurance coverage percentages, and alter or liberalize underwriting standards on low-down-payment mortgages they purchase.

 

In addition to the GSEs, the Federal Home Loan Banks, or FHLBs, purchase single-family conforming mortgage loans. Although not required to do so, the FHLBs currently use mortgage insurance on substantially all mortgage loans with a loan-to-value ratio above 80%.

 

International mortgage insurance

 

We have significant mortgage insurance operations in Australia and Canada, two of the largest markets for mortgage insurance products outside the U.S., as well as smaller operations in New Zealand and the developing markets in Europe, Mexico and Japan. The net premiums written in our international mortgage insurance business have increased by a compound annual growth rate of 32% for the three years ended December 31, 2005. Insurance in-force for our international mortgage insurance business contributed 71% of our total insurance in-force as of December 31, 2005 compared to 64% as of December 31, 2004 and 53% as of December 31, 2003. In addition, earnings from our international mortgage insurance business represented 53%, 47% and 39% of our mortgage insurance net earnings for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, representing a compound annual growth rate of 37% from 2003 to 2005.

 

The mortgage loan markets in the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand are well developed. Although mortgage insurance plays an important role in each of these markets, the markets vary significantly and are influenced in large part by the different cultural, economic and regulatory conditions in each market. We believe the following factors have contributed to the growth of robust mortgage insurance demand in these countries:

 

    a desire by lenders to offer low-down-payment mortgage loans to facilitate the expansion of their business;

 

36


Table of Contents
    the recognition of the higher default risk inherent in low-down-payment lending and the need for specialized underwriting expertise to conduct this business prudently;

 

    government housing policies that support increased homeownership;

 

    government policies that support the use of securitization and secondary market mortgage sales, in which third-party credit enhancement is often used, as a source of funding and liquidity for mortgage lending; and

 

    bank regulatory capital policies that provide incentives to lenders to transfer some or all of the increased credit risk on low-down-payment mortgages to third parties, such as mortgage insurers.

 

We believe a number of these factors are becoming evident in certain markets throughout Europe, Latin America and Asia and provide opportunities for us to expand our mortgage insurance business in those markets.

 

Based upon our experience in the mature markets, we believe a favorable regulatory framework is important to the development of an environment in which lenders routinely extend high loan-to-value loans and use products such as mortgage insurance to protect against default risk or obtain capital relief. As a result, we have advocated governmental and policymaking agencies throughout our markets adopt legislative and regulatory policies supporting increased homeownership and capital relief for lenders and mortgage investors that insure their loan portfolios with private mortgage insurance. Although the products we offer in each of our international markets differ, they represent substantially similar risk propositions and involve similar business practices. We have developed significant expertise in mature markets, and we leverage this experience in developing markets as we continue to encourage regulatory authorities to implement incentives for private mortgage insurance as an effective risk management strategy.

 

We believe the revisions to a set of regulatory rules and procedures governing global bank capital standards that were introduced by the Basel Committee of the Bank for International Settlements, known as Basel II, also may encourage further growth of international mortgage insurance. Basel II has been designed to reward banks that have developed effective risk management systems by allowing them to hold less capital than banks with less effective systems. For example, Basel II may reward a lender that transfers some risk of mortgage default to a third-party insurer by reducing the amount of capital that the lender must hold to back a mortgage. Basel II was finalized and issued in June 2004; however, its adoption by individual countries is ongoing. Therefore, we cannot predict the benefits that ultimately will be provided to lenders, or how any such benefits may affect the opportunities for the growth of mortgage insurance. Under proposed rules released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (“APRA”) during 2005 in connection with the Basel II framework, certain approved deposit-taking institutions (“ADIs”) in Australia would be required to hold less capital on high loan-to-value mortgage loans and would also receive a capital incentive for using mortgage insurance, but at a reduced level when compared to current regulations in Australia. APRA has also proposed that ADIs would need to acquire mortgage insurance coverage levels lower than existing requirements in order to obtain these reduced capital incentives. We continue to work with APRA on this proposed rulemaking, which is expected to become effective January 1, 2008. If the final rules retain these provisions, lenders in Australia may be able to reduce their use of mortgage insurance for high loan-to-value ratio mortgages, which may have an adverse affect on our Australian business.

 

Certain markets in Europe, Latin America and Asia have strong demand for housing, but are underserved by the existing housing finance systems. As a result, we believe that mortgage insurance could enhance the overall scale, effectiveness and efficiency of these mortgage markets.

 

We expect lenders in these countries will seek to expand their consumer mortgage loan portfolios, while maintaining strong risk and capital management routines. With the expected implementation of the new Basel II standards, we believe we will be well positioned to assist lenders in these markets in meeting those goals and in complying with the anticipated complexity of the risk-based capital and operating standards.

 

37


Table of Contents

Canada

 

We entered the Canadian mortgage insurance market in 1995 with our acquisition of certain assets and employees from the Mortgage Insurance Corporation of Canada, and we now operate in every province and territory. We are currently the only private mortgage insurer in the Canadian market, although other companies have recently applied for a license to sell mortgage insurance in Canada.

 

Products

 

We offer two products in Canada: primary flow insurance and portfolio credit enhancement insurance. Our principal product is primary flow insurance, which is similar to the primary flow insurance we offer in the U.S. Regulations in Canada require the use of mortgage insurance for all mortgage loans extended by banks, trust companies and insurers, where the loan-to-value ratio exceeds 75%. Mortgage insurance in Canada is typically single premium and provides 100% coverage, in contrast to the U.S., where monthly premiums and lower coverage levels are typical. Under the single-premium plan, lenders usually include the single premium as a part of the aggregate loan amount and pay a single premium to us as the mortgage insurer. We, in turn, record the proceeds to unearned premium reserves, invest those proceeds and recognize the premiums over time in accordance with the expected expiration of risk.

 

We also provide portfolio credit enhancement insurance to lenders that have originated loans with loan-to-value ratios of less than 75%. These policies provide lenders with immediate capital relief from applicable bank regulatory capital requirements and facilitate the securitization of mortgages in the Canadian market. In both primary flow insurance and portfolio policies, our mortgage insurance in Canada provides insurance coverage for the entire unpaid loan balance, including interest, selling costs and expenses, following the sale of the underlying property.

 

The leading mortgage product in the Canadian market is a mortgage with the interest rate fixed for the first five years of the loan. After the fifth year, the loan becomes due and payable and the borrower must negotiate its renewal, at which time the borrower may choose to have the interest rate float or have it fixed for an additional period. Lenders typically charge a mortgage pre-payment penalty that serves as a disincentive for borrowers to refinance their mortgages. Changes in interest rates, adverse economic conditions and high levels of borrowing affect the frequency of defaults and claims with respect to these loans, which may adversely affect our loss experience.

 

Regulations in Canada require the use of mortgage insurance for all mortgage loans extended by banks, trust, companies and insurers with loan-to-value ratios greater than 75%. In February 2005, as part of a periodic review of the federal financial services regulatory framework, the Canadian Department of Finance issued a consultation document seeking comment on a wide variety of potential initiatives relating to the regulation of financial services, including whether to remove the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance on all loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 75%. The removal of the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance, in whole or in part, may result in a reduction in the amount of business we write in future years in Canada. See “—Regulation—Mortgage Insurance—International Regulation—Canada.”

 

Government guarantee

 

We have an agreement with the Canadian government under which it guarantees the benefits payable under a mortgage insurance policy, less 10% of the original principal amount of an insured loan, in the event that we fail to make claim payments with respect to that loan because of insolvency. We pay the Canadian government a risk premium for this guarantee and make other payments to a reserve fund in respect of the government’s obligation. Because banks are not required to maintain regulatory capital on an asset backed by a sovereign guarantee, our 90% sovereign guarantee permits lenders purchasing our mortgage insurance to reduce their regulatory capital charges for credit risks on mortgages by 90%.

 

38


Table of Contents

Customers

 

The nine largest mortgage originators in Canada, consisting of banks, trust companies, and credit unions, collectively provide more than 80% of the financing for Canada’s residential mortgage financing. The nine largest originators in each of the past three years provided us with 83%, 87% and 85% of our new insurance written for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Other market participants include regional banks, trust companies, and credit unions.

 

Competitors

 

Currently, the only other mortgage insurance competitor in Canada is the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, or CMHC, which is a Crown corporation owned by the Canadian government. Because CMHC is a government-owned entity, its mortgage insurance provides lenders with 100% capital relief from bank regulatory requirements. We compete with CMHC primarily based upon our reputation for high-quality customer service, quick decision-making on insurance applications, strong underwriting expertise and flexibility in terms of product development. In April 2005, the CMHC announced a 15% rate reduction for loans with a loan-to-value ratio exceeding 90%, which we have matched. Rate reductions or other actions taken by the CMHC to reduce rates or compete with us in other ways may cause our revenue in our Canadian mortgage insurance business to decline. In addition, as in other markets, we compete in Canada with alternative products and financial structures, such as credit default swaps, which are designed to transfer credit default risk on mortgage loans.

 

Australia and New Zealand

 

We entered the Australian mortgage insurance market in 1997 with our acquisition of the operating assets of the Housing Loans Insurance Corporation, or HLIC, from the Australian government. We entered the New Zealand mortgage insurance market in 1999 as an expansion of our Australian operations.

 

Products

 

In Australia and New Zealand, we offer primary flow insurance, known as “lenders mortgage insurance,” or LMI, and portfolio credit enhancement policies. Our principal product is LMI, which is similar to the primary flow insurance we offer in Canada, with single premiums and 100% coverage. Lenders usually collect the single premium from prospective borrowers at the time the loan proceeds are advanced and remit the amount to us as the mortgage insurer. We in turn record the proceeds to unearned premium reserves, invest those proceeds and recognize the premiums over time in accordance with the expected expiration of risk.

 

We provide LMI on a flow basis to two types of customers: banks, building societies and credit unions; and non-bank mortgage originators, called mortgage managers. Banks, building societies and credit unions generally acquire LMI only for residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios above 80%. Under APRA requirements, effective January 1, 2006, reduced capital requirements apply to high loan-to-value residential mortgages only if they have been insured by a mortgage insurance company that is regulated by APRA or is subject to comparable regulation in its home jurisdiction and is otherwise acceptable to APRA. After October 1, 2004, “non-standard” loans with a loan-to-value ratio above 60% are entitled to a reduced capital requirement only if they meet strict requirements as established by APRA or are insured by a qualified LMI. APRA’s regulations currently require APRA-regulated lenders to determine the criteria for determining if a loan is a non-standard type loan. Our insurance subsidiary that serves the Australian and New Zealand markets has financial-strength ratings of “AA” (Very Strong) from S&P and Fitch and a rating of “Aa2” (Excellent) from Moody’s. The “AA” rating is the third-highest of S&P’s 20 ratings categories and the third-highest of Fitch’s 24 ratings categories. The “Aa2” rating is the third-highest of Moody’s 21 ratings categories.

 

Mortgage managers fund their operations primarily through the issuance of mortgage-backed securities. Because they are not regulated by APRA, they do not have the same capital incentives as banks for acquiring

 

39


Table of Contents

LMI. However, they use LMI as the principal form of credit enhancement for these securities and generally purchase insurance for every loan they originate, without regard to the loan-to-value ratio.

 

We also provide portfolio credit enhancement policies to APRA-regulated lenders that have originated loans for securitization in the Australian market. Portfolio mortgage insurance serves as an important source of credit enhancement for the Australian securitization market, and our portfolio credit enhancement coverage generally is purchased for low loan-to-value, seasoned loans written by APRA-regulated institutions. To date, a market for these portfolio credit enhancement policies has not developed in New Zealand to the same extent as in Australia.

 

In both primary LMI and portfolio credit enhancement policies, our mortgage insurance provides insurance coverage for the entire unpaid loan balance, including selling costs and expenses, following the sale of the security property. Most of the loans we insure in Australia and New Zealand are variable rate mortgages with loan terms of between 20 and 30 years.

 

In connection with our acquisition of the operating assets of HLIC in 1997, we agreed to service a mortgage insurance portfolio that was retained by the Australian government. We receive a small amount of management fees for handling claims and providing loss mitigation and related services, but we did not acquire HLIC’s originated insurance policies and do not bear any risk on those policies.

 

Customers

 

The ten largest mortgage originators in Australia, consisting of banks and mortgage managers, collectively provide more than 80% of Australia’s and New Zealand’s residential mortgage financing. The ten largest originators in each of the past three years provided us with 67% of our new insurance written for the year ended December 31, 2005, and 78% for 2004 and 2003. Other market participants in Australian and New Zealand mortgage lending include regional banks, building societies and credit unions.

 

Competitors

 

The Australian and New Zealand flow mortgage insurance markets currently are served by one other independent LMI company, as well as various lender-affiliated captive mortgage insurance companies. We compete primarily based upon our reputation for high-quality customer service, quick decision making on insurance applications, strong underwriting expertise and flexibility in terms of product development. As in Canada, our products also compete in Australia and New Zealand with alternative products and financial structures that are designed to transfer credit default risk on mortgage loans. We believe other U.S. mortgage insurance providers are considering opportunities in Australia.

 

APRA’s license conditions require Australian mortgage insurance companies, including ours, to be mono-line insurers, which are insurance companies that offer just one type of insurance product.

 

Europe

 

We began our European operations in the U.K., which is Europe’s largest market for mortgage loan originations. We expanded into six additional countries and we continue to explore opportunities in other European countries. Mortgage insurance originating in the U.K. accounted for approximately 42% of our European mortgage insurance in-force as of December 31, 2005 as compared to 54% as of December 31, 2004. This large concentration in the U.K. is attributable primarily to the fact that we have been operating in that country considerably longer than in any other European country. Our growth in other European countries has helped to diversify our risk.

 

Products

 

Our European business currently consists principally of primary flow insurance on adjustable-rate mortgages. As is the case in our other non-U.S. markets, most primary flow insurance policies written in Europe

 

40


Table of Contents

are structured with single premium payments. Our primary flow insurance generally provides first-loss coverage in the event of default on a portion (typically 10%-20%) of the balance of an individual mortgage loan. We believe that, over time, there is an opportunity to provide additional products with higher coverage percentages to reduce the risks to lenders of low-down-payment lending to levels similar to those in more mature mortgage insurance markets. We also recently began offering portfolio credit enhancement policies to lenders that have originated loans for securitization in select European markets.

 

Customers

 

As a result of our strategy to expand organically into new markets in Europe with attractive growth potential, we have diversified our risk among seven countries, thereby reducing our historical concentration in the U.K. Our portfolio of international mortgage insurance in-force in Europe is concentrated in the countries where we have been active for the longest period of time and with customers with whom we have been doing business for the longest period of time. We expect this concentration to diminish over time. Our customers are primarily banks and mortgage investors, and our largest customer in Europe represented 26% of our new insurance written for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

Competitors

 

Our European business faces competition from both traditional mortgage insurance companies as well as providers of alternative credit enhancement products. Our competitors are both public and private entities. Public mortgage guarantee facilities exist in a number of countries, which may compete with our products. We also face competition from some of our U.S. private mortgage competitors as well as multi-line insurers primarily in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland.

 

We also face competition from alternative credit enhancement products, such as personal guarantees on high loan-to-value loans, second mortgages and bank guarantees, and captive insurance companies organized by lenders. Lenders also have sought other forms of risk transfer, such as the use of capital market solutions through credit derivatives. In addition, some European lenders have chosen to price for and retain the additional credit risk, effectively self-insuring their low-down-payment loans. We believe that our global expertise, coverage flexibility, and strong ratings provide a very valuable offering compared with competitors and alternative products.

 

Loan portfolio

 

The following table sets forth selected financial information regarding the effective risk in-force of our international mortgage insurance loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   2005

   2004

   2003

Loan-to-value ratio

                    

95.01% and above

   $ 1,448    $ 515    $ 132

90.01% to 95.00%

     19,337      14,707      11,549

80.01% to 90.00%

     28,679      23,841      15,762

80.00% and below

     29,539      22,944      15,926
    

  

  

Total

   $ 79,003    $ 62,007    $ 43,369
    

  

  

Loan type(1)

                    

Fixed rate mortgage

   $ 59    $ —      $ —  

Adjustable rate mortgage

     78,944      62,007      43,369
    

  

  

Total

   $ 79,003    $ 62,007    $ 43,369
    

  

  

Mortgage term

                    

15 years and under

   $ 32,041    $ 26,138    $ 17,486

More than 15 years

     46,962      35,869      25,883
    

  

  

Total

   $ 79,003    $ 62,007    $ 43,369
    

  

  


(1) For loan type in this table, any loan with an interest rate that is fixed for an initial term of five years or less is categorized as an adjustable rate mortgage.

 

41


Table of Contents

Our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada currently provide 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in those markets. The table above presents effective risk in-force, which recognizes the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. As of December 31, 2005, this factor was 35%.

 

Loans in default and claims

 

The claim process in our international mortgage insurance business is similar to the process we follow in our U.S. mortgage insurance business. See “—Mortgage Insurance—U.S. mortgage insurance—Loans in default and claims.” The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of loans in default and the default rate for our international mortgage insurance portfolio:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

    2003

 

Primary insurance

                  

Insured loans in-force

   1,910,964     1,591,485     1,282,731  

Loans in default

   7,091     5,304     4,926  

Percentage of loans in default (default rate)

   0.4 %   0.3 %   0.4 %

Flow loans in-force

   1,627,587     1,346,035     1,044,131  

Flow loans in default

   6,866     5,084     4,679  

Percentage of flow loans in default (default rate)

   0.4 %   0.4 %   0.5 %

Portfolio credit enhancement loans in-force

   283,377     245,450     238,600  

Portfolio credit enhancement loans in default

   225     220     247  

Percentage of portfolio credit enhancement loans in default (default rate)

   0.1 %   0.1 %   0.1 %

 

Corporate and Other

 

Our Corporate and Other segment consists of net realized investment gains (losses), and unallocated corporate income and expenses (including amounts accrued in settlement of class action lawsuits), interest, and other financing expenses that are incurred at our holding company level. This segment also includes the results of our subsidiaries Viking Insurance Company LTD. (“Viking”), GE Seguros (“Seguros”) and other small, non-core businesses that are managed outside our operating segments. Beginning in 2006, Seguros will be managed within our Protection segment as part of the payment protection business.

 

Viking is a Bermuda-based reinsurer primarily of leased equipment insurance and consumer credit insurance underwritten by American Bankers Insurance Company, or ABIC. GE Commercial Finance, formerly known as Vendor Financial Services, purchased property and casualty insurance from ABIC on behalf of certain of its lessees to cover leased equipment. ABIC then reinsured those policies with Viking. GE Consumer Finance, formerly Card Services, develops and markets credit insurance through credit card issuers, retailers and banks. These credit insurance policies also are underwritten by ABIC and then reinsured with Viking.

 

GE Commercial Finance ceased purchasing new insurance coverage on behalf of lessees through ABIC, as of March 1, 2004, and GE Consumer Finance intends to phase out marketing credit insurance over the next several years. GE Capital has agreed to take all commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the relevant existing insurance and reinsurance relationships, but we expect Viking’s reinsurance programs with GE Consumer Finance and GE Commercial Finance to decline steadily over the next several years and, ultimately, be discontinued. With respect to GE Consumer Finances’ credit insurance, GE Capital may decide to encourage a switch of existing coverages to another program. In that event, GE Capital has agreed to pay Viking an amount equal to the net underwriting income Viking is projected to receive as reinsurer from the date of discontinuation of any credit insurance program through December 31, 2008.

 

42


Table of Contents

Viking also has an in-force block of reinsurance of U.S. and Canadian consumer auto warranties and property and casualty gap insurance that protects consumers from the risk of loss on any difference between the value of an automobile and any loans secured by it. We do not intend to enter into any new warranty of gap insurance reinsurance treaties, and the existing treaties are in run-off, with the remaining program expiring gradually through 2008.

 

Seguros, is a small Mexican-domiciled multi-line insurer. We acquired this business in 1995 and currently hold 99.6% of its outstanding shares. Seguros is licensed to sell property and casualty, life and health insurance in Mexico.

 

Seguros currently writes primarily motor vehicle coverage for personal and commercial domestic vehicles and personal coverage for tourist vehicles. It also writes a small amount of homeowners’, commercial property, transport and life insurance. Seguros distributes its products through independent agents in Mexico and, for the tourist auto business, it also distributes its products through agents located in key U.S. border locations. Seguros maintains agency relationships through its branch offices in major Mexican cities.

 

Viking and Seguros had aggregate net earnings of $28 million, $44 million, and $28 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

International Operations

 

Information regarding our U.S. and international operations is presented in note 21 to the financial statements under “Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Distribution

 

We distribute our products through an extensive and diversified distribution network, including independent sales intermediaries, brokerage general agencies, financial intermediaries and independent producers and dedicated sales specialists. We believe access to a variety of distribution channels enables us to respond effectively to changing consumer needs and distribution trends. We compete with other financial institutions to attract and retain commercial relationships in each of these channels, and our success in competing for sales through these sales intermediaries depends upon factors such as the amount of sales commissions and fees we pay, the strength and breadth of our product offerings, our customer service to the intermediary, the time it takes to process an application, the strength of our brand, our perceived stability and our financial strength ratings, the marketing and services we provide to them and the strength of the relationships we maintain with individuals at those firms. We have strategically positioned our multi-channel distribution network to capture a broad share of the distributor and consumer markets and to accommodate different consumer preferences in how to purchase insurance and financial services products.

 

Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments

 

Our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments both distribute their products through the following channels:

 

    financial intermediaries, including banks, securities brokerage firms, and independent broker/dealers;

 

    independent producers, including brokerage general agencies, or BGAs, affluent market producer groups and specialized brokers, and insurance marketing organizations or IMO’s; and

 

    dedicated sales specialists, including long-term care sales agents and affiliated networks of both accountants and personal financial advisers.

 

43


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our annualized first-year premiums and deposits for the products in our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments (other than our payment protection insurance business), categorized by each of our distribution channels. For our payment protection insurance business, the following table sets forth written premiums, gross of reinsurance and cancellations, because historically we have not tracked annualized first-year premiums for this business.

 

    Year ended December 31, 2005

  Year ended December 31, 2004

(Dollar amounts in millions)


  Financial
intermediaries


  Independent
producers


  Dedicated
sales
specialists


  Total

  Financial
intermediaries


  Independent
producers


  Dedicated
sales
specialists


  Total

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits(1)

                                               

Protection

                                               

Life insurance

  $ 6   $ 205   $ —     $ 211   $ 7   $ 135   $ 2   $ 144

Long-term care insurance

    38     60     72     170     41     47     74     162

Group life and health insurance

    —       174     —       174     —       171     —       171

Retirement Income and Investments

                                               

Spread-based retail products

    2,166     631     34     2,831     2,136     848     34     3,018

Spread-based institutional products

    —       2,316     —       2,316     —       2,151     —       2,151

Fee-based products

    1,019     884     808     2,711     1,018     678     542     2,238

Written premiums(2)

                                               

Protection

                                               

Payment protection insurance

    1,829     —       —       1,829     1,501     —       —       1,501

(1) Annualized first-year premiums and deposits reflect the amount of business we generated during a specified period. We consider annualized first-year premiums and deposits to be a measure of our operating performance because they represent a measure of new sales of insurance policies and additional investments by our customers during a specified period, rather than a measure of our revenues or profitability during that period.
(2) Reflects written premiums, gross of reinsurance and cancellations.

 

Financial intermediaries

 

We have selling agreements with approximately 1,200 financial intermediaries in the U.S., including banks, securities brokerage firms and independent broker/dealers. We use financial intermediaries to distribute a significant portion of our deferred and income annuities and other investment products and long-term care insurance. They also distribute a small portion of our life insurance policies to their individual clients. We have approximately 150 wholesalers in the U.S. who are our employees and who work to develop sales relationships with new financial intermediaries and to expand sales with existing financial intermediaries. In addition, we have approximately 170 distributors, most of whom are financial intermediaries, for our payment protection insurance products.

 

Independent producers

 

Brokerage general agencies. We distribute most of our products, including life insurance, annuities and long-term care insurance, through approximately 625 independent BGAs located throughout the U.S. BGAs market our products, and those of other insurance companies, through a network of approximately 230,000 independent brokers who can sell our products.

 

Affluent market producer groups. Through strong relationships with several industry-leading affluent market producer groups, we have access to approximately 6,200 producers who sell our products. These groups target

 

44


Table of Contents

high-net-worth individuals, which we define to include households with at least $1 million of liquid assets, as well as small to medium-size businesses, which we define as those with fewer than 1,000 employees. We distribute life insurance, long-term care insurance and annuity products through these groups.

 

Specialized brokers. We distribute many of our products through brokers that specialize in a particular insurance or investment product and deliver customized service and support to their clients. We access a network of approximately 615 specialized independent brokers to distribute structured settlements. We distribute our group life and health insurance products and services through an independent network of approximately 4,000 licensed group life and health brokers and agents that are supported by our nationwide sales force of approximately 100 employees. These group brokers and agents typically specialize in providing employee benefit and retirement solution services to employers. We also distribute GICs and funding agreements through a group of 40 specialized brokers and investment managers.

 

Insurance Marketing Organizations. We distribute life insurance, annuities and long term care insurance through a national network of 17 insurance marketing organizations, or IMOs. IMOs are independent sales organizations that concentrate on the middle market, particularly homebuyers and other mortgagees. Through IMOs we have access to approximately 5,000 retail producers.

 

Dedicated sales specialists

 

Long-term care agents. We have approximately 1,350 active sales agents who specialize in selling our long-term care insurance products. These sales agents also sell our Medicare supplement insurance product and the products of other insurers on a select basis. We employ the individuals who manage and support the dedicated sales specialists. We compensate our long-term care agents primarily on a commission basis. To support lead generation for this channel, we have a comprehensive direct mail and marketing program, including mass marketing and affinity strategies that target members of various organizations, such as travel, social and professional organizations. We also identify prospective customers through educational seminars, policyholder referrals and targeted promotions linked to our national advertising campaigns.

 

Accountants and financial professionals. We have approximately 2,400 affiliated financial professionals who sell our annuity and insurance products including variable products, third-party mutual funds and other investment products through our wholly-owned broker/dealer. In the past several years, accountants have been increasingly responsible for assisting their clients with long-term financial planning, as well as traditional accounting and tax-related services. As a result, accountants provide us with an opportunity for growth as a distribution channel. We primarily distribute annuities and other investment products through this channel.

 

Mortgage Insurance

 

We distribute our mortgage insurance products through our dedicated sales force of more than 100 employees located throughout the U.S. This sales force primarily markets to financial institutions and mortgage originators, which in turn offer mortgage insurance products to borrowers. In addition to our field sales force, we also distribute our products through a telephone sales force serving our smaller lenders, as well as through our “Action Center” which provides live phone and web chat-based support for all our customer segments.

 

We also maintain a dedicated sales force that markets our mortgage insurance products to lenders in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Mexico and Japan. As in the U.S. market, our sales force markets to financial institutions and mortgage originators, who in turn offer mortgage insurance products to borrowers.

 

Marketing

 

We promote and differentiate our products and services through breadth of offerings, technology services, specialized support for our distributors and innovative marketing programs tailored to particular consumer groups.

 

45


Table of Contents

We offer a range of products that meet the needs of consumers throughout the various stages of their lives. We are selective in the products we offer and strive to maintain appropriate return and risk thresholds when we expand the scope of our product offerings. We believe our reputation for innovation and our selective breadth of products enable us to sustain strong relationships with our distributors and position us to benefit from the current trend among distributors to reduce the number of insurers with whom they maintain relationships. We also have developed sophisticated technological tools that enhance performance by automating key processes and reducing response times and process variations. These tools also make it easier for our customers and distributors to do business with us.

 

We have focused our marketing approach on promoting our brand to key constituencies, including sales intermediaries, employees, investors and consumers. These programs include advertising on television and in trade and business periodicals that are likely to reach those demographic groups. We also seek to build recognition of our brand and maintain strong relationships with leading distributors by providing a high level of specialized and differentiated distribution support, such as product training, advanced marketing and sales solutions, financial product design for affluent customers and technology solutions that support the distributors’ sales efforts and by pursuing joint business improvement efforts. In addition, we sponsor various advisory councils with independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists to gather their feedback on industry trends, new product suggestions and ways to enhance our relationships.

 

We also have been actively marketing our products and services to U.S. Latino customers, who we believe are substantially underserved by insurance and investment products, despite being the largest minority group in the U.S. As part of this campaign, we support Hispanic-focused distribution, translate various marketing materials into Spanish, advertise our services on Spanish language media and participate in Latin American cultural events. We operate a Spanish-language website devoted to financial education for U.S. Latinos. In addition, we introduced our new emerging market web-based mortgage platform, TuCasaAhora.com, which was designed to help Latinos become homeowners. The product combines bilingual education, discounts, and incentives to support Latino first time homeownership.

 

Pursuant to a transitional trademark license agreement, GE granted us the right to use the “GE” mark and the “GE” monogram for up to five years following the IPO in connection with our products and services. Most of our current products and services, however, are now primarily using the Genworth mark and logo, and we expect to complete our transition to the Genworth brand by the end of 2006.

 

Risk Management

 

Overview

 

Risk management is a critical part of our business and we have adopted an enterprise risk management framework that includes rigorous risk management processes in virtually every aspect of our operations, including product development, business acquisitions, underwriting, investment management, asset-liability management and technology development projects. The risk management framework includes the assessment of risk, a proactive decision process to determine which risks are acceptable, and the ongoing monitoring and management of those risks. The primary objective of these risk management processes is to reduce the variations we experience from our expected results. We have an experienced group of professionals, including actuaries, statisticians and other specialists, dedicated exclusively to our risk management process. We have emphasized our adherence to rigorous risk management techniques and leveraged the benefits into a competitive advantage in marketing and managing our products.

 

New product introductions

 

Our risk management process begins with the development and introduction of new products and services. We have established a rigorous product development process that specifies a series of required analyses, reviews and approvals for any new product. For each proposed project, this process includes a review of the market

 

46


Table of Contents

opportunity and competitive landscape, major pricing assumptions and methodologies, return expectations, reinsurance strategies, underwriting criteria and business risks and potential mitigating factors. Before we introduce a new product in the market, we establish a monitoring program with specific performance targets and leading indicators, which we monitor frequently to identify any deviations from expected performance so that we can take prompt corrective action when necessary. Significant product introductions require approval by our senior management team. We use a similarly rigorous process to introduce variations to existing products and to offer existing products through new distribution channels.

 

New business acquisitions

 

When we consider an acquisition of a new block or book of business, we use our extensive risk management process to evaluate the new business opportunity and assess its strategic fit with our current business model. We have a rigorous review process that includes a series of required analyses, reviews and approvals similar to those employed for new product introductions.

 

Product performance reviews

 

Our Risk Committee includes our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Actuary, and the Presidents of our three operating segments. The Risk Committee reviews major products in all our operating segments on a regular cycle, typically twice per year. These reviews include an analysis of the major drivers of profitability, underwriting performance, variations from expected results, regulatory and competitive environment and other factors affecting product performance. In addition, we initiate special reviews when a product’s performance fails to meet any of the indicators we established during that product’s introductory review process. If a product does not meet our performance criteria, we consider adjustments in pricing, design and marketing or ultimately discontinuing sales of that product. In addition, in our Mortgage Insurance segment, we also review the profitability of lender accounts on a quarterly basis to assess whether our business with these lenders is achieving anticipated performance levels and to identify trends requiring remedial action, including changes to underwriting guidelines, product mix or other customer performance. We review our underwriting, pricing and risk selection strategies on a regular basis to ensure that our products remain progressive, competitive and consistent with our marketing and profitability objectives. We are also subject to periodic external audits by our reinsurers, which provide us with valuable insights into other innovative risk management practices.

 

Asset-liability management

 

We maintain segmented investment portfolios for the majority of our product lines. This enables us to perform an ongoing analysis of the interest rate risks associated with each major product line, in addition to the interest rate risk for our overall enterprise. We analyze the behavior of our liability cash flows across a wide variety of future interest rate scenarios, reflecting policy features and expected policyholder behavior. We also analyze the behavior of our asset portfolios across the same scenarios. We believe this analysis shows the sensitivity of both our assets and liabilities to large and small changes in interest rates and enables us to manage our assets and liabilities more effectively.

 

Portfolio diversification

 

We use limits to ensure a spread of risk in our business. We have strict limitations on credit risk to avoid concentration in our investment portfolio. Our product portfolios have considerable diversification due to the wide variety of products we have sold over a number of years. We also manage unique product exposures in our business segments. For example, in managing our mortgage insurance risk exposure, we carefully monitor geographic concentrations in our portfolio and the condition of housing markets in each country in which we operate. We monitor our concentration of risk in-force at the regional, state and major metropolitan area levels on a quarterly basis. In the U.S., we evaluate the condition of housing markets in major metropolitan areas with our proprietary OmniMarketSM model, which rates housing markets based on variables such as economic activity,

 

47


Table of Contents

unemployment, mortgage delinquencies, home sales trends and home price changes. We also regularly monitor factors that affect home prices and their affordability by region and major metropolitan area.

 

Actuarial databases and information systems

 

Our extensive actuarial databases and innovative information systems technology are important tools in our risk management programs. We believe we have the largest actuarial database for long-term care insurance claims with over 30 years of experience in offering those products. We also have substantial experience in offering individual life insurance products, and we have developed a large database of claims experience, particularly in preferred risk classes, which provides significant predictive experience for mortality.

 

We use advanced and, in some cases, proprietary technology to manage variations in our underwriting process. For example, our GENIUS® new business processing system uses digital underwriting technology that has lowered our operating costs and increased the speed, consistency and accuracy of our underwriting process by reducing decision-making variation. In our mortgage insurance business we use borrower credit scores, our proprietary mortgage scoring model, OmniScore®, and our extensive database of mortgage insurance experience to evaluate new products and portfolio performance. OmniScore® uses the borrower’s credit score and additional data concerning the borrower, the loan and the property, including loan-to-value ratio, loan type, loan amount, property type, occupancy status and borrower employment to predict the likelihood of having to pay a claim. In the U.S., OmniScore® also incorporates our assessment of the housing market in which a property is located, as evaluated with our OmniMarket® model. We believe this additional mortgage data and housing market assessment significantly enhances OmniScore’s® predictive power over the life of the loan. We perform portfolio analysis on an ongoing basis to determine if modifications are required to our product offerings, underwriting guidelines or premium rates.

 

Compliance

 

Legal and regulatory compliance are critical parts of our business and we are recognized in the insurance industry for our excellence in these areas. In recognition of our commitment, we have twice received the American Council of Life Insurers’ “Integrity First Award” for our compliance programs. Throughout our company we instill a strong commitment to integrity and ethics in business dealings and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, we are an Insurance Marketplace Standards Association qualified company. We have approximately 200 professionals dedicated to legal and compliance matters.

 

Operations and Technology

 

Service and support

 

We have a dedicated team of approximately 3,700 service and support personnel, supplemented by a service and support staff of approximately 1,300 personnel through an arrangement with an outsourcing provider in India, who assist our sales intermediaries and customers with their service needs. We use advanced and, in some cases, proprietary, patent-pending technology to provide product design and underwriting, and we operate service centers that leverage technology, integrated processes, and process management techniques.

 

In our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments, we interact directly and cost-effectively with our independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists through secure websites that have enabled them to transact business with us electronically, obtain information about our products, submit applications, check application and account status and view commission information. We also provide our independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists with account information to disseminate to their customers through the use of industry-standard communications.

 

We also have introduced technologically advanced services to customers in our Mortgage Insurance segment. Advances in technology enable us to accept applications through electronic submission and to issue electronic insurance commitments and certificates. Through our Internet-enabled information systems, lenders can receive information about their loans in our database, as well as make corrections, file notices and claims, report settlement amounts, verify loan information and access payment histories. We also assist in workouts through LMO Fast-

 

48


Table of Contents

Track, which we believe is the mortgage insurance industry’s first on-line workout approval system, allowing lenders to request and obtain authorization from us for them to provide workout solutions to their borrowers. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we issued approximately 86% of our U.S. mortgage insurance commitments electronically, compared to 86% for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 82% for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

Operating centers

 

We have centralized most of our operations and have established scalable, low-cost operating centers in Virginia, North Carolina and Ireland. In addition, through an arrangement with an outsourcing provider, we have a substantial team of professionals in India who provide a variety of services to us, including customer service, transaction processing, and functional support including finance, investment research, actuarial, risk and marketing resources to our insurance operations.

 

Technology capabilities and process improvement

 

We rely on proprietary processes for project approval, execution, risk management and benefit verification as part of our approach to technology investment. We have been issued 14 patents and have filed more than 70 pending patent applications. Our technology team is experienced in large-scale project delivery, including many insurance administration system consolidations and the development of Internet-based servicing capabilities. We continually manage technology costs by standardizing our technology infrastructure, consolidating application systems, reducing servers and storage devices and managing project execution risks.

 

We believe we have greatly enhanced our operating efficiency, generated significant cost savings, and created competitive advantages by using a variety of process tools designed to address all aspects of process management. Our tools enable us to more effectively operate processes, improve our process performance, and build new processes. Our team of operational quality experts is focused on driving our process and project execution and championing process management disciplines. We always tailor the application of our tools to the specific needs of each project or process resulting in more effective execution.

 

Reserves

 

We calculate and maintain reserves for estimated future benefit payments to our policyholders and contractholders in accordance with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices. We release these reserves as those future obligations are extinguished. The reserves we establish necessarily reflect estimates and actuarial assumptions with regard to our future experience. These estimates and actuarial assumptions involve the exercise of significant judgment which is subjected to a variety of internal and external independent reviews. Our future financial results depend significantly upon the extent to which our actual future experience is consistent with the assumptions we have used in pricing our products and determining our reserves. Many factors can affect future experience, including economic and social conditions, inflation, healthcare costs, changes in doctrines of legal liability and damage awards in litigation. Therefore, we cannot determine with complete precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual future benefits or the timing of those payments.

 

Protection

 

We establish reserves for life insurance policies based upon generally recognized actuarial methods. We use mortality tables in general use in the U.S. and Europe, modified where appropriate, to reflect relevant historical experience and our underwriting practices. Persistency, expense and interest rate assumptions are based upon relevant experience and expectations for future development. We establish reserves at amounts which, including the receipt of assumed additional premiums and interest assumed to be earned on the assets underlying the reserves, we expect to be sufficient to satisfy our policy obligations.

 

49


Table of Contents

The liability for policy benefits for universal life insurance policies and interest-sensitive whole life policies is equal to the balance that accrues to the benefit of policyholders, including credited interest, plus any amount needed to provide for additional benefits. We also reflect in the reserves amounts that we have deducted from the policyholder’s balance to compensate us for services to be performed in future periods.

 

We establish reserves for long-term care insurance policies based upon factors including mortality, persistency, expenses, claim likelihood, benefit utilization levels, claim continuance, and any applicable coverage limitations. Long-term care insurance does not have the extensive historical claims experience of life insurance, and therefore, there is more uncertainty when forecasting future experience for long-term care insurance products than for life products.

 

Our reserves for unpaid group life and health insurance claims, including our medical and non-medical lines, are estimates of the ultimate net cost of both reported losses that have not yet been settled and incurred but as yet unreported losses. For reported claims, our reserves are based upon an evaluation of the claims, including anticipated run-out patterns, and include a provision for adverse claim development and fluctuation. Reserves for incurred but not reported claims are based upon historic incidence rates, severity rates, reporting delays and any known events which we believe will materially affect claim levels.

 

Reserves for long-term disability claims are based upon factors including recovery, mortality, expenses, Social Security and other benefit offsets, and investment income. They represent the actuarial present value of benefits and associated expenses for current claims, reported claims that have not yet completed the applicable elimination period and for covered disabilities that have been incurred but have not yet been reported. Claims on long-term disability insurance policies consist of payments to be made periodically, generally monthly, in accordance with the contractual terms of the policy.

 

We establish reserves for our payment protection insurance using a number of actuarial models. Claim reserves are calculated separately for disability, life and unemployment business. Reserves are established at three different stages of a claim: incurred but not reported, reported but not paid, and in the course of payment.

 

Retirement Income and Investments

 

For our investment contracts, including annuities, GICs, and funding agreements, contractholder liabilities are equal to the accumulated contract account values, which generally consist of an accumulation of deposit payments, less withdrawals, plus investment earnings and interest credited to the account, less expense, mortality, and profit charges, if applicable. We also maintain a separate reserve for any expected future payments in excess of the account value.

 

Reserves for future policy benefits on our immediate fixed annuity contracts are calculated based upon actuarial assumptions regarding the interest to be earned on the assets underlying the reserves and, if applicable, the annuitant’s expected mortality.

 

Mortgage Insurance

 

In our mortgage insurance businesses, a significant period of time may elapse between the occurrence of the borrower’s default on a mortgage payment, which is the event triggering a potential future claim payment, the reporting of such default and our eventual payment of the claim. Consistent with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices, we establish reserves for loans that are in default, including loans that are in default but have not yet been reported, by forecasting the percentage of loans in default on which we will ultimately pay claims and the average claim that will be paid. We generally consider a loan to be in default if the borrower has failed to make a required mortgage payment for two consecutive months. In addition to our reserves for known loans in default, we establish reserves for “loss adjustment expenses” to provide for the estimated costs of settling claims, including legal and other fees, and general expenses of administering the claims settlement process.

 

50


Table of Contents

We estimate ultimate claims and associated costs based upon our historical loss experience, adjusted for the anticipated effect of current economic conditions and projected economic trends. Consistent with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices, we do not establish loss reserves for future claims on insured loans that are not currently in default.

 

To improve the reserve estimation process, we segregate our mortgage loan portfolio based upon a variety of factors, and we analyze each segment of the portfolio in light of our default experience to produce our reserve estimate. We review these factors on a periodic basis and adjust our loss reserves accordingly. Although inflation is implicitly included in the estimates, the impact of inflation is not explicitly isolated from other factors influencing the reserve estimates. We do not discount our loss reserves for financial reporting purposes.

 

We also establish liabilities related to contract underwriting indemnification. Under the terms of our contract underwriting agreements, we agree to indemnify the lender against losses incurred in the event that we make material errors in determining that loans processed by our contract underwriters meet specified underwriting or purchase criteria. We revise our estimates of these liabilities from time to time to reflect our recent experience.

 

Reinsurance

 

We follow the industry practice of reinsuring portions of our insurance risks with reinsurance companies. We use reinsurance both to diversify our risks and to manage loss exposures and capital effectively. The use of reinsurance permits us to write policies in amounts larger than the risk we are willing to retain, and also to write a larger volume of new business.

 

We cede insurance primarily on a treaty basis, under which risks are ceded to a reinsurer on specific blocks of business where the underlying risks meet certain predetermined criteria. To a lesser extent, we cede insurance risks on a facultative basis, under which the reinsurer’s prior approval is required on each risk reinsured. Use of reinsurance does not discharge us, as the insurer, from liability on the insurance ceded. We, as the insurer, are required to pay the full amount of our insurance obligations even in circumstances where we are entitled or able to receive payments from our reinsurer. The principal reinsurers to which we cede risks have A.M. Best financial strength ratings ranging from “A+” to “B++”, with one reinsurer not rated but whose balance is fully collateralized. Historically, we have not had significant concentrations of reinsurance risk with any one reinsurer. However, prior to the completion of the IPO, we entered into reinsurance transactions with UFLIC, which resulted in a significant concentration of reinsurance risk with UFLIC whose obligations to us are secured by trust accounts as described in note 9 in our financial statements under “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

 

The following table sets forth our exposure to our principal reinsurers, including reinsurance recoverable as of December 31, 2005 and the A.M. Best ratings of those reinsurers as of that date:

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


  

Reinsurance

recoverable


   A.M. Best rating

UFLIC(1)

   $ 15,737    A-

Phoenix Life Insurance Company(2)

     728    A

IDS Life Insurance Company(3)

     727    A+

Swiss Re Life & Health America Inc.

     221    A+

Munich American Reassurance Company

     158    A+

Employers Reassurance Corporation

     92    B++

Revios Reinsurance(4)

     75    Not Rated

(1) Refer to note 9 in our financial statements under “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
(2) Our reinsurance arrangement with Phoenix covers a run-off block of corporate-owned life insurance policies. Both of these arrangements originated from acquisitions.
(3) Our reinsurance arrangement with IDS covers a run-off block of single-premium life insurance policies.
(4) Revios Reinsurance refers to Revios Reinsurance International which is not a formally rated company. However, the reinsurance recoverable balance is fully collateralized on a funds held basis.

 

51


Table of Contents

As discussed above under “—Mortgage Insurance—Products and Services—Risk mitigation arrangements—Captive reinsurance,” in the U.S., we have entered into a number of reinsurance agreements in which we share portions of our mortgage insurance risk written on loans originated or purchased by lenders with captive reinsurance companies, or captive reinsurers, affiliated with these lenders. In return, we cede an agreed portion of our gross premiums on insurance written to the captive reinsurers. Substantially all of our captive mortgage reinsurance arrangements are structured on an excess-of-loss basis. As of December 31, 2005, our total mortgage insurance risk reinsured to all captive reinsurers was $3.0 billion, and the total capital held in trust for our benefit by all captive reinsurers was $609 million. These captive reinsurers are not rated, and their claims-paying obligations to us are limited to the amount of capital held in trust. We believe the capital held in trust by these captive reinsurers is sufficient to meet their anticipated obligations to us. However, we cannot ensure that each captive with which we do business can or will meet all its obligations to us.

 

Financial Strength Ratings

 

Ratings with respect to financial strength are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. Ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in us and our ability to market our products. Rating organizations review the financial performance and condition of most insurers and provide opinions regarding financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations to policyholders. Short-term financial strength ratings are an assessment of the credit quality of an issuer with respect to an instrument considered short-term in the relevant market, typically one year or less.

 

Our principal life insurance subsidiaries are rated by A.M. Best, S&P, Moody’s and Fitch as follows:

 

Company


 

A.M. Best rating


  S&P rating

  Moody’s rating

  Fitch rating

American Mayflower Life Insurance Company of New York

 

A+ (Superior)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

Federal Home Life Insurance Company

 

A+ (Superior)

  Not rated   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

First Colony Life Insurance Company

 

A+ (Superior)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York

 

A+ (Superior)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company

 

A+ (Superior)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (Short term rating)

 

Not rated

  A-1+ (Strong)   P1 (Superior)   Not Rated

GE Group Life Assurance Company

 

A (Excellent)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Not Rated   Not Rated

Genworth Life Insurance Company

 

A+ (Superior)

  AA- (Very Strong)   Aa3 (Excellent)   AA- (Very Strong)

Genworth Life Insurance Company (Short term rating)

 

Not rated

  A-1+ (Strong)   P1 (Superior)   Not Rated

 

Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries are rated by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch as follows:

 

Company(1)


  

S&P rating


   Moody’s rating

   Fitch rating

Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation

  

AA (Very Strong)

   Aa2 (Excellent)    AA (Very Strong)

Genworth Residential Mortgage Insurance Corporation of NC

  

AA (Very Strong)

   Aa2 (Excellent)    AA (Very Strong)

Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Company Pty. Limited

  

AA (Very Strong)

   Aa2 (Excellent)    AA (Very Strong)

Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Limited

  

AA (Very Strong)

   Aa2 (Excellent)    AA (Very Strong)

 

52


Table of Contents

(1) Our Canadian mortgage insurance company is not rated by any of the rating agencies shown above.

 

The A.M. Best, S&P, Moody’s and Fitch ratings included are not designed to be, and do not serve as, measures of protection or valuation offered to investors. These financial strength ratings should not be relied on with respect to making an investment in our securities.

 

A.M. Best states that its “A+” (Superior) rating is assigned to those companies that have, in its opinion, a superior ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders. The “A+” (Superior) rating is the second-highest of fifteen ratings assigned by A.M. Best, which range from “A++” to “S”.

 

S&P states that an insurer rated “AA” (Very Strong) has very strong financial security characteristics that outweigh any vulnerabilities, and is highly likely to have the ability to meet financial commitments. The “AA” range is the second-highest of the four ratings ranges that meet these criteria, and also is the second-highest of nine financial strength rating ranges assigned by S&P, which range from “AAA” to “R.” A plus (+) or minus (-) shows relative standing in a rating category. Accordingly, the “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of S&P’s 20 ratings categories. The short-term “A-1” rating is the highest rating and shows the capacity to meet financial commitments is strong. Within this category, the designation of a plus sign (+) indicates capacity to meet its’ financial commitment is extremely strong.

 

Moody’s states that insurance companies rated “Aa” (Excellent) offer excellent financial security. Moody’s states that companies in this group constitute what are generally known as high-grade companies. The “Aa” range is the second-highest of nine financial strength rating ranges assigned by Moody’s, which range from “Aaa” to “C.” Numeric modifiers are used to refer to the ranking within the group, with 1 being the highest and 3 being the lowest. Accordingly, the “Aa2” and “Aa3” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Moody’s 21 ratings categories. The short-term rating “P1” is the highest rating and shows superior ability for repayment of short-term debt obligations.

 

Fitch states that “AA” (Very Strong) rated insurance companies are viewed as possessing very strong capacity to meet policyholder and contract obligations. Risk factors are modest, and the impact of any adverse business and economic factors is expected to be very small. The “AA” rating category is the second-highest of eight financial strength rating categories, which range from “AAA” to “D.” The symbol (+) or (-) may be appended to a rating to indicate the relative position of a credit within a rating category. These suffixes are not added to ratings in the “AAA” category or to ratings below the “CCC” category. Accordingly, the “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Fitch’s 24 ratings categories.

 

A.M. Best, S&P, Moody’s and Fitch review their ratings periodically and we cannot assure you that we will maintain our current ratings in the future. Other agencies may also rate our company or our insurance subsidiaries on a solicited or an unsolicited basis.

 

Investments

 

Overview

 

As of December 31, 2005, we had total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets of $68.4 billion (including $685 million of restricted investments held by securitization entities) and an additional $9,106 million held in our separate accounts, for which we do not bear investment risk. We manage our assets to meet diversification, credit quality, yield and liquidity requirements of our policy and contract liabilities by investing primarily in fixed maturities, including government, municipal and corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities and mortgage loans on commercial real estate. We also invest in short-term securities and other investments, including a small position in equity securities. In all cases, investments for our particular insurance company subsidiaries are required to comply with restrictions imposed by applicable laws and insurance regulatory authorities.

 

53


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   Carrying
value


   % of
total


    Carrying
value


   % of
total


 

Fixed-maturities, available-for-sale

                          

Public

   $ 40,539    59 %   $ 40,150    60 %

Private

     13,252    19       12,274    18  

Commercial mortgage loans

     7,558    11       6,051    9  

Other investments

     2,772    4       3,996    6  

Policy loans

     1,350    2       1,224    2  

Restricted investments held by securitization entities

     685    1       860    1  

Equity securities, available for sale

     367    1       374    1  

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

     1,900    3       2,210    3  
    

  

 

  

Total cash and invested assets

   $ 68,423    100 %   $ 67,139    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

For a discussion of our investment results, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Investment Results.”

 

Our primary investment objective is to meet our obligations to policyholders and contractholders while increasing value to our stockholders by investing in a diversified high quality portfolio, income producing securities and other assets. Our investment strategy seeks to optimize investment income without relying on realized investment gains. Our investment strategy focuses primarily on:

 

    minimizing interest rate risk through management of asset durations relative to policyholder and contractholder obligations;

 

    selecting assets based on fundamental, research-driven strategies;

 

    emphasizing fixed-interest, low-volatility assets;

 

    maintaining sufficient liquidity to meet unexpected financial obligations;

 

    regularly evaluating our asset class mix and pursuing additional investment classes; and

 

    continuously monitoring asset quality.

 

We are exposed to two primary sources of investment risk:

 

    credit risk, relating to the uncertainty associated with the continued ability of a given issuer to make timely payments of principal and interest; and

 

    interest rate risk, relating to the market price and cash flow variability associated with changes in market interest rates.

 

We manage credit risk by analyzing issuers, transaction structures and any associated collateral. We use sophisticated analytic techniques to monitor credit risk. For example, we continually measure the probability of credit default and estimated loss in the event of such a default, which provides us with early notification of worsening credits. We also manage credit risk through industry and issuer diversification and asset allocation practices. For commercial mortgage loans, we manage credit risk through geographic, property type and product type diversification and asset allocation. We routinely review different issuers and sectors and conduct more formal quarterly portfolio reviews with our Investment Committee.

 

We mitigate interest rate risk through rigorous management of the relationship between the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities, seeking to minimize risk of loss in both rising and falling interest rate environments. For further information on our management of interest rate risk, see “Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

 

54


Table of Contents

Organization

 

Our investment department consists of more than 140 individuals, led by our Chief Investment Officer. Our investment department includes portfolio management, risk management, finance and accounting functions and, under the direction of the Investment Committee, is responsible for establishing investment policies and strategies, reviewing asset liability management and performing asset allocation. In addition, we manage certain asset classes for our domestic insurance operations, including commercial mortgage loans, privately placed debt securities and derivatives.

 

GE Asset Management (“GEAM”) provides investment management services for significant portions of our U.S. and Bermudan investment portfolios pursuant to investment management and services agreements and investment guidelines approved by the boards of directors of our insurance subsidiaries. We have agreed to pay GEAM a management fee for these services on a quarterly basis equal to a percentage of the value of the assets under management to be paid quarterly in arrears. The percentage is established annually by agreement between GEAM and us and is intended to reflect the cost to GEAM of providing its services. We incurred expenses for investment management and related administrative services of $71 million, $52 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of which $22 million, $33 million and $61 million was paid to GEAM for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

Management of investments for our non-U.S. operations is overseen by the managing director and boards of directors of the applicable non-U.S. legal entities in consultation with our Chief Investment Officer. Substantially all the assets of our payment protection and European mortgage insurance businesses are managed by GE Asset Management Limited, or GEAML, pursuant to agreements that are substantially similar to our agreements with GEAM in the U.S. The majority of the assets of our Canadian, Australian and New Zealand mortgage insurance businesses continue to be managed by unaffiliated investment managers located in their respective countries. Approximately 8% of our invested assets, as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were held by our international operations and were invested primarily in non-U.S.-denominated securities.

 

Fixed maturities

 

Fixed maturities, which are classified as available-for-sale, including tax-exempt bonds, consist principally of publicly traded and privately placed debt securities, and represented 79% and 78% of total cash and invested assets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

We invest in privately placed fixed maturities to increase diversification and obtain higher yields than can ordinarily be obtained with comparable public market securities. Generally, private placements provide us with protective covenants, call protection features and, where applicable, a higher level of collateral. However, our private placements are not freely transferable because of restrictions imposed by federal and state securities laws, the terms of the securities and illiquid trading markets.

 

The Securities Valuation Office of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, evaluates bond investments of U.S. insurers for regulatory reporting purposes and assigns securities to one of six investment categories called “NAIC designations.” The NAIC designations parallel the credit ratings of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds considered investment grade (rated “Baa3” or higher by Moody’s, or rated “BBB-” or higher by S&P) by such rating organizations. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds considered below investment grade (rated “Ba1” or lower by Moody’s, or rated “BB+” or lower by S&P).

 

The following tables present our public, private and aggregate fixed maturities by NAIC and/or equivalent ratings of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, as well as the percentage, based upon estimated fair value, that each designation comprises. Our non-U.S. fixed maturities generally are not rated by the NAIC and are shown based upon their equivalent rating of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating

 

55


Table of Contents

Organizations. Similarly, certain privately placed fixed maturities that are not rated by the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations are shown based upon their NAIC designation. Certain securities, primarily non-U.S. securities, are not rated by the NAIC or the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations and are so designated.

 

          December 31,

 

Public fixed maturities


   2005

    2004

 

NAIC

rating


  

Rating agency equivalent designation


   Amortized
cost


  

Estimated

fair value


   % of
total


   

Amortized

cost


  

Estimated

fair value


   % of
total


 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


                                

1

   Aaa/Aa/A    $ 28,681    $ 29,295    72 %   $ 27,839    $ 28,635    71 %

2

   Baa      8,787      9,072    23       8,847      9,344    23  

3

   Ba      1,456      1,466    4       1,339      1,415    4  

4

   B      550      557    1       646      651    2  

5

   Caa and lower      87      79    —         73      63    —    

6

   In or near default      11      13    —         13      15    —    
     Not rated      57      57    —         26      27    —    
         

  

  

 

  

  

     Total public fixed maturities    $ 39,629    $ 40,539    100 %   $ 38,783    $ 40,150    100 %
         

  

  

 

  

  

 

     December 31,

 

Private fixed maturities


   2005

    2004

 

NAIC

Rating


  

Rating agency equivalent designation


  

Amortized

cost


  

Estimated

fair value


  

% of

total


   

Amortized

cost


  

Estimated

fair value


  

% of

total


 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


                                

1

   Aaa/Aa/A    $ 7,326    $ 7,452    56 %   $ 6,272    $ 6,501    53 %

2

   Baa      5,033      5,091    39       4,587      4,768    39  

3

   Ba      466      485    4       574      605    5  

4

   B      157      157    1       198      202    2  

5

   Caa and lower      15      16    —         112      103    1  

6

   In or near default      41      34    —         44      43    —    
     Not rated      16      17    —         52      52    —    
         

  

  

 

  

  

     Total private fixed maturities    $ 13,054    $ 13,252    100 %   $ 11,839    $ 12,274    100 %
         

  

  

 

  

  

 

     December 31,

 

Total fixed maturities


   2005

    2004

 

NAIC

rating


  

Rating agency equivalent designation


   Amortized
cost


  

Estimated

fair value


   % of
total


    Amortized
cost


  

Estimated

fair value


  

% of

total


 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


                                

1

   Aaa/Aa/A    $ 36,007    $ 36,747    69 %   $ 34,111    $ 35,136    67 %

2

   Baa      13,820      14,163    26       13,434      14,112    27  

3

   Ba      1,922      1,951    4       1,913      2,020    4  

4

   B      707      714    1       844      853    2  

5

   Caa and lower      102      95    —         185      166    —    

6

   In or near default      52      47    —         57      58    —    
     Not rated      73      74    —         78      79    —    
         

  

  

 

  

  

     Total fixed maturities    $ 52,683    $ 53,791    100 %   $ 50,622    $ 52,424    100 %
         

  

  

 

  

  

 

Based upon estimated fair value, public fixed maturities represented 75% and 77% of total fixed maturities as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Private fixed maturities represented 25% and 23% of total fixed maturities as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

56


Table of Contents

We diversify our fixed maturities by security sector. The following table sets forth the estimated fair value of our fixed maturities by sector as well as the percentage of the total fixed maturities holdings that each security sector comprised as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   Estimated
fair value


   % of
total


    Estimated
fair value


   % of
total


 

U.S. government, agencies and government sponsored entities

   $ 805    2 %   $ 572    1 %

Tax exempt

     2,890    6       3,030    6  

Government—non-U.S.

     1,806    3       1,744    3  

U.S. corporate

     26,122    49       27,101    52  

Corporate—non-U.S.

     9,405    17       8,100    15  

Mortgage-backed

     8,736    16       8,577    17  

Asset-backed

     4,027    7       3,300    6  
    

  

 

  

Total fixed maturities

   $ 53,791    100 %   $ 52,424    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

The following table sets forth the major industry types that comprise our corporate bond holdings, based primarily on industry codes established by Lehman Brothers, as well as the percentage of the total corporate bond holdings that each industry comprised as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   Estimated
fair value


   % of
total


    Estimated
fair value


   % of
total


 

Finance and insurance

   $ 11,400    32 %   $ 10,357    30 %

Utilities and energy

     6,836    19       7,056    20  

Consumer—non cyclical

     4,632    13       4,351    12  

Consumer—cyclical

     2,642    7       2,666    8  

Industrial

     2,141    6       2,475    7  

Capital goods

     2,043    6       2,240    6  

Technology and communications

     2,424    7       2,223    6  

Transportation

     1,325    4       1,063    3  

Other

     2,084    6       2,770    8  
    

  

 

  

Total

   $ 35,527    100 %   $ 35,201    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

We diversify our corporate bond holdings by industry and issuer. The portfolio does not have significant exposure to any single issuer. As of December 31, 2005, our combined corporate bond holdings in the ten issuers to which we had the greatest exposure was $2.5 billion, which was approximately 4% of our total cash and invested assets as of such date. The exposure to the largest single issuer of corporate bonds held as of December 31, 2005 was $299 million, which was less than 1% of our total cash and invested assets as of such date.

 

We do not have material unhedged exposure to foreign currency risk in our invested assets. In our non-U.S. insurance operations, both our assets and liabilities are generally denominated in local currencies. Foreign currency denominated securities supporting U.S. dollar liabilities generally are swapped into U.S. dollars using derivative financial instruments.

 

57


Table of Contents

Commercial mortgage loans

 

Our mortgage loans are collateralized by commercial properties, including multifamily residential buildings. The carrying value of commercial mortgage loans is stated at original cost net of prepayments, amortization and allowance for losses.

 

We diversify our commercial mortgage loans by both property type and geographic region. The following table sets forth the distribution across property type and geographic region for commercial mortgage loans as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   Carrying
value


   % of
total


    Carrying
value


   % of
total


 

Property Type

                          

Office

   $ 2,197    29 %   $ 1,822    30 %

Industrial

     2,109    28       1,797    30  

Retail

     2,092    28       1,574    26  

Apartments

     833    11       650    11  

Mixed use/other

     327    4       208    3  
    

  

 

  

Total

   $ 7,558    100 %   $ 6,051    100 %
    

  

 

  

Geographic Region

                          

Pacific

   $ 2,272    30 %   $ 1,796    30 %

South Atlantic

     1,586    21       1,239    20  

Middle Atlantic

     1,088    14       953    16  

East North Central

     794    11       682    11  

Mountain

     580    8       463    8  

West South Central

     336    4       306    5  

West North Central

     440    6       252    4  

East South Central

     280    4       225    4  

New England

     182    2       135    2  
    

  

 

  

Total

   $ 7,558    100 %   $ 6,051    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

The following table sets forth the distribution of our commercial mortgage loans by loan size as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


  

Number of

loans


  

Principal

balance


   % of
total


   

Number of

loans


  

Principal

balance


   % of
total


 

Under $5 million

   1,658    $ 3,407    45 %   1,560    $ 3,073    50 %

$5 million but less than $10 million

   265      1,831    24     210      1,442    24  

$10 million but less than $20 million

   102      1,427    19     73      1,009    17  

$20 million but less than $30 million

   19      448    6     14      334    5  

More than $30 million

   12      469    6     6      237    4  
    
  

  

 
  

  

Total

   2,056    $ 7,582    100 %   1,863    $ 6,095    100 %
    
  

  

 
  

  

 

Equity securities

 

Our equity securities, which are classified as available-for-sale, primarily consist of retained interests in our securitization transactions, as well as mutual funds and investments in publicly-traded preferred and common stocks of U.S. and non-U.S. companies.

 

58


Table of Contents

Other investments

 

The following table sets forth the carrying values of our other investments as of the dates indicated:

 

     December 31,

 
     2005

    2004

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)


   Carrying
value


  

% of

total


   

Carrying

value


   % of
total


 

Securities lending

   $ 1,820    66 %   $ 3,202    80 %

Derivative assets

     559    20       442    11  

Limited partnerships

     156    5       183    5  

Other investments

     237    9       169    4  
    

  

 

  

Total

   $ 2,772    100 %   $ 3,996    100 %
    

  

 

  

 

We participate in a securities lending program whereby blocks of securities included in our portfolio are loaned primarily to major brokerage firms. We require a minimum of 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities to be separately maintained as collateral for the loans. The limited partnerships primarily represent interests in pooled investment funds that make private equity investments in U.S. and non-U.S. companies. Other investments are primarily amounts on deposit with foreign governments.

 

We use derivative financial instruments, such as financial futures, interest rate and foreign currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts, financial futures and option-based financial instruments, as part of our risk management strategy. We use these derivatives to mitigate certain risks, including interest rate risk, currency risk and equity risk, by:

 

    reducing the risk between the timing of the receipt of cash and its investment in the market;

 

    matching the currency of invested assets with the liabilities they support;

 

    converting the asset duration to match the duration of the liabilities;

 

    reducing our exposure to fluctuations in equity market indices that underlie some of our products; and

 

    protecting against the early termination of an asset or liability.

 

As a matter of policy, we have not engaged in derivative market-making, speculative derivative trading or other speculative derivatives activities.

 

Selected financial information regarding our derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are included under “Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Instruments.”

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately 6,900 full-time and part-time employees. We believe our employee relations are satisfactory. To the best of our knowledge, none of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Some of our employees in Europe may be members of trade unions, but local data privacy laws prohibit us from asking them about their membership in trade unions, and they are not required to inform us.

 

Directors and Executive Officers

 

See Part III, Item 10. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information about our Directors and Executive Officers.

 

59


Table of Contents

Available Information

 

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports are available, without charge, on our website, www.genworth.com, as soon as reasonably practicable. Our SEC filings are also accessible through the Internet at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. Copies are also available, without charge, from Genworth Investor Relations, 6620 West Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230. This Annual Report on Form 10-K is being distributed to stockholders in lieu of a separate annual report.

 

Our website also includes the charters of our Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Public Affairs Committee and Management Development and Compensation Committee, the key practices of these committees, our Corporate Governance Principles, and our company’s code of ethics. Copies of these materials also are available, without charge, from Genworth Investor Relations, at the above address. Within the time period required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we will post on our website any amendment to our code of ethics and any waiver applicable to any of our directors, executive officers or senior financial officers.

 

On June 15, 2005 our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange that he was not aware of any violation by us of the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance listing standards.

 

Transfer Agent and Registrar

 

Our Transfer Agent and Registrar is The Bank of New York, P.O. Box 11258, Church Street Station, New York, NY 10286. Telephone: (800) 524-4458, (610) 382-7833; outside the U.S. call collect (888) 269-5221.

 

Regulation

 

Our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and supervision.

 

General

 

Our insurance operations are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations. State insurance laws regulate most aspects of our U.S. insurance businesses, and our insurance subsidiaries are regulated by the insurance departments of the states in which they are domiciled and licensed. Our non-U.S. insurance operations are principally regulated by insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which they are domiciled. Our insurance products and thus our businesses also are affected by U.S. federal, state and local tax laws, and the tax laws of non-U.S. jurisdictions. Insurance products that constitute “securities,” such as variable annuities and variable life insurance, also are subject to U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. securities laws and regulations. The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, the National Association of Securities Dealers, or NASD, state securities authorities and non-U.S. authorities regulate and supervise these products.

 

Our securities operations are subject to U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. securities and related laws. The SEC, state securities authorities, the NASD and similar non-U.S. authorities are the principal regulators of these operations.

 

The purpose of the laws and regulations affecting our insurance and securities businesses is primarily to protect our customers and not our stockholders. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations.

 

In addition, insurance and securities regulatory authorities (including state law enforcement agencies and attorneys general or their non-U.S. equivalents) increasingly make inquiries regarding compliance by us and our subsidiaries with insurance, securities and other laws and regulations regarding the conduct of our insurance and securities businesses. We cooperate with such inquiries and take corrective action when warranted.

 

60


Table of Contents

Many of our customers and independent sales intermediaries also operate in regulated environments. Changes in the regulations that affect their operations also may affect our business relationships with them and their ability to purchase or to distribute our products.

 

U.S. Insurance Regulation

 

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are licensed and regulated in all jurisdictions in which they conduct insurance business. The extent of this regulation varies, but most jurisdictions have laws and regulations governing the financial condition of insurers, including standards of solvency, types and concentration of investments, establishment and maintenance of reserves, credit for reinsurance and requirements of capital adequacy, and the business conduct of insurers, including marketing and sales practices and claims handling. In addition, statutes and regulations usually require the licensing of insurers and their agents, the approval of policy forms and related materials and the approval of rates for certain lines of insurance.

 

The types of U.S. insurance laws and regulations applicable to us or our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are described below. Our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries are subject to additional insurance laws and regulations applicable specifically to mortgage insurers discussed below under “—Mortgage Insurance.”

 

Insurance holding company regulation

 

All U.S. jurisdictions in which our U.S. insurance subsidiaries conduct insurance business have enacted legislation that requires each U.S. insurance company in a holding company system, except captive insurance companies, to register with the insurance regulatory authority of its jurisdiction of domicile and to furnish that regulatory authority financial and other information concerning the operations of, and the interrelationships and transactions among, companies within its holding company system that may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of the insurers within the system. These laws and regulations also regulate transactions between insurance companies and their parents and affiliates. Generally, these laws and regulations require that all transactions within a holding company system between an insurer and its affiliates be fair and reasonable and that the insurer’s statutory surplus following any transaction with an affiliate be both reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate to its financial needs. Statutory surplus is the excess of admitted assets over the sum of statutory liabilities and capital. For certain types of agreements and transactions between an insurer and its affiliates, these laws and regulations require prior notification to, and non-disapproval or approval by, the insurance regulatory authority of the insurer’s jurisdiction of domicile.

 

Policy forms

 

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries’ policy forms are subject to regulation in every U.S. jurisdiction in which such subsidiaries are licensed to transact insurance business. In most U.S. jurisdictions, policy forms must be filed prior to their use. In some U.S. jurisdictions, forms must also be approved prior to use.

 

Dividend limitations

 

As a holding company with no significant business operations of our own, we depend on dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries as the principal source of cash to meet our obligations, including the payment of interest on, and repayment of, principal of any debt obligations. The payment of dividends or other distributions to us by our U.S. insurance subsidiaries is regulated by the insurance laws and regulations of their respective states of domicile. In general, an insurance company subsidiary may not pay an “extraordinary” dividend or distribution until 30 days after the applicable insurance regulator has received notice of the intended payment and has not objected in such period or has approved the payment within the 30-day period. In general, an “extraordinary” dividend or distribution is defined by these laws and regulations as a dividend or distribution that, together with other dividends and distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater (or, in some jurisdictions, the lesser) of:

 

    10% of the insurer’s statutory surplus as of the immediately prior year end; or

 

61


Table of Contents
    the statutory net gain from the insurer’s operations (if a life insurer) or the statutory net income (if not a life insurer) during the prior calendar year.

 

The laws and regulations of some of these jurisdictions also prohibit an insurer from declaring or paying a dividend except out of its earned surplus or require the insurer to obtain regulatory approval before it may do so. In addition, insurance regulators may prohibit the payment of ordinary dividends or other payments by our insurance subsidiaries to us (such as a payment under a tax sharing agreement or for employee or other services) if they determine that such payment could be adverse to our policyholders or contractholders.

 

Market conduct regulation

 

The laws and regulations of U.S. jurisdictions include numerous provisions governing the marketplace activities of insurers, including provisions governing the form and content of disclosure to consumers, product illustrations, advertising, product replacement, sales and underwriting practices, complaint handling and claims handling. The regulatory authorities in U.S. jurisdictions generally enforce these provisions through periodic market conduct examinations.

 

Statutory examinations

 

As part of their regulatory oversight process, insurance departments in U.S. jurisdictions conduct periodic detailed examinations of the books, records, accounts and business practices of insurers domiciled in their jurisdictions. These examinations generally are conducted in cooperation with the insurance departments of two or three other states or jurisdictions, representing each of the NAIC zones, under guidelines promulgated by the NAIC.

 

In the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, we have not received any material adverse findings resulting from any insurance department examinations of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries.

 

Guaranty associations and similar arrangements

 

Most of the jurisdictions in which our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are licensed to transact business require life insurers doing business within the jurisdiction to participate in guaranty associations, which are organized to pay contractual benefits owed pursuant to insurance policies of insurers who become impaired or insolvent. These associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurers in a particular jurisdiction on the basis of the proportionate share of the premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired, insolvent or failed insurer is engaged. Some jurisdictions permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. Aggregate assessments levied against our U.S. insurance subsidiaries were not material to our financial statements.

 

Change of control

 

The laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are domiciled require that a person obtain the approval of the insurance commissioner of the insurance company’s jurisdiction of domicile prior to acquiring control of the insurer. Generally, such laws provide that control over an insurer is presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing, 10% or more of the voting securities of the insurer. In considering an application to acquire control of an insurer, the insurance commissioner generally will consider such factors as the experience, competence and financial strength of the applicant, the integrity of the applicant’s board of directors and executive officers, the acquiror’s plans for the management and operation of the insurer, and any anti-competitive results that may arise from the acquisition. In addition, a person seeking to acquire control of an insurance company is required in some states to make filings prior to completing an acquisition if the acquiror and the target insurance company and their affiliates have sufficiently large market shares in particular lines of insurance in those states. Approval of an acquisition is not required in these states, but the state insurance

 

62


Table of Contents

departments could take action to impose conditions on an acquisition that could delay or prevent its consummation. These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control involving us, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our stockholders might consider to be desirable.

 

Policy and contract reserve sufficiency analysis

 

Under the laws and regulations of their jurisdictions of domicile, our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries are required to conduct annual analyses of the sufficiency of their life and health insurance and annuity statutory reserves. In addition, other jurisdictions in which these subsidiaries are licensed may have certain reserve requirements that differ from those of their domiciliary jurisdictions. In each case, a qualified actuary must submit an opinion that states that the aggregate statutory reserves, when considered in light of the assets held with respect to such reserves, make good and sufficient provision for the associated contractual obligations and related expenses of the insurer. If such an opinion cannot be provided, the affected insurer must set up additional reserves by moving funds from surplus. Our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries submit these opinions annually to applicable insurance regulatory authorities. Different reserve requirements exist for our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries. See “—Reserves—Mortgage Insurance.”

 

Surplus and capital requirements

 

Insurance regulators have the discretionary authority, in connection with the ongoing licensing of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries, to limit or prohibit the ability of an insurer to issue new policies if, in the regulators’ judgment, the insurer is not maintaining a minimum amount of surplus or is in hazardous financial condition. Insurance regulators may also limit the ability of an insurer to issue new life insurance policies and annuity contracts above an amount based upon the face amount and premiums of policies of a similar type issued in the prior year. We do not believe that the current or anticipated levels of statutory surplus of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries present a material risk that any such regulator would limit the amount of new policies that our U.S. insurance subsidiaries may issue.

 

Risk-based capital

 

The NAIC has established risk-based capital standards for U.S. life insurance companies as well as a model act with the intention that these standards be applied at the state level. The model act provides that life insurance companies must submit an annual risk-based capital report to state regulators reporting their risk-based capital based upon four categories of risk: asset risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk and business risk. For each category, the capital requirement is determined by applying factors to various asset, premium and reserve items, with the factor being higher for those items with greater underlying risk and lower for less risky items. The formula is intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify possible weakly capitalized companies for purposes of initiating further regulatory action.

 

If an insurer’s risk-based capital falls below specified levels, the insurer would be subject to different degrees of regulatory action depending upon the level. These actions range from requiring the insurer to propose actions to correct the capital deficiency to placing the insurer under regulatory control. As of December 31, 2005, the risk-based capital of each of our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries exceeded the level of risk-based capital that would require any of them to take or become subject to any corrective action.

 

Statutory accounting principles

 

Statutory accounting principles, or SAP, is a basis of accounting developed by U.S. insurance regulators to monitor and regulate the solvency of insurance companies. In developing SAP, insurance regulators were primarily concerned with assuring an insurer’s ability to pay all its current and future obligations to policyholders. As a result, statutory accounting focuses on conservatively valuing the assets and liabilities of

 

63


Table of Contents

insurers, generally in accordance with standards specified by the insurer’s domiciliary jurisdiction. Uniform statutory accounting practices are established by the NAIC and generally adopted by regulators in the various U.S. jurisdictions. These accounting principles and related regulations determine, among other things, the amounts our insurance subsidiaries may pay to us as dividends.

 

U.S. GAAP is designed to measure a business on a going-concern basis. It gives consideration to matching of revenue and expenses and, as a result, certain expenses are capitalized when incurred and then amortized over the life of the associated policies. The valuation of assets and liabilities under U.S. GAAP is based in part upon best estimate assumptions made by the insurer. Stockholders’ equity represents both amounts currently available and amounts expected to emerge over the life of the business. As a result, the values for assets, liabilities and equity reflected in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are materially different from those reflected in financial statements prepared under SAP.

 

Regulation of investments

 

Each of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries is subject to laws and regulations that require diversification of its investment portfolio and limit the amount of investments in certain asset categories, such as below investment grade fixed maturities, equity real estate, other equity investments and derivatives. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding regulatory limitations to be treated as non-admitted assets for purposes of measuring surplus, and, in some instances, would require divestiture of such non-complying investments. We believe the investments made by our U.S. insurance subsidiaries comply with these laws and regulations.

 

Federal regulation

 

Our variable life insurance and variable annuity products generally are “securities” within the meaning of federal and state securities laws. As a result, they are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to regulation by the SEC, the NASD and state securities authorities. Federal and state securities regulation similar to that discussed below under “—Securities Regulation” affect investment advice and sales and related activities with respect to these products. In addition, although the federal government does not comprehensively regulate the business of insurance, federal legislation and administrative policies in several other areas, including taxation, financial services regulation and pension and welfare benefits regulation, can also significantly affect the insurance industry.

 

Federal initiatives

 

Although the federal government generally does not directly regulate the insurance business, federal initiatives often, and increasingly, have an impact on the business in a variety of ways. From time to time, federal measures are proposed which may significantly affect the insurance business, including limitations on antitrust immunity, tax incentives for lifetime annuity payouts, simplification bills affecting tax-advantaged or tax-exempt savings and retirement vehicles, and proposals to modify or make permanent the estate tax repeal enacted in 2001. In addition, various forms of direct federal regulation of insurance have been proposed in recent years. We cannot predict whether any such proposals will be adopted, or what impact, if any, such proposals or, if adopted, such laws may have on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

 

Changes in tax laws

 

Changes in tax laws could make some of our products less attractive to consumers. For example, the gradual repeal of the federal estate tax, begun in 2001, is continuing to be phased in through 2010. The repeal and continuing uncertainty created by the repeal of the federal estate tax has resulted in reduced sales, and could continue to adversely affect sales and surrenders, of some of our estate planning products, including survivorship/second-to-die life insurance policies. In May 2003, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation

 

64


Table of Contents

Act of 2003 was signed into law to lower the federal income tax rate on capital gains and certain ordinary dividends. This reduction may provide an incentive for certain of our customers and potential customers to shift assets into mutual funds and away from our products, including annuities, that are designed to defer taxes payable on investment returns. On the other hand, individual income tax rates are scheduled to revert to previous levels in 2010, and that could have a positive influence on the interest of investors in our products. Similarly, the 2008 expiration of favorable income tax rates for dividend income could increase interest in our products.

 

U.K. Insurance Regulation

 

General

 

Insurance and reinsurance businesses in the U.K. are subject to close regulation by the Financial Services Authority, or FSA. We have U.K. subsidiaries that have received authorization from the FSA to effect and carry out contracts of insurance in the U.K. An authorized insurer in the U.K. is able to operate throughout the European Union, subject to certain regulatory requirements of the FSA and in some cases, certain local regulatory requirements. Certain of our U.K. subsidiaries operate in other member states of the European Union through the establishment of branch offices.

 

Supervision

 

The FSA has adopted a risk-based approach to the supervision of insurance companies. Under this approach the FSA periodically performs a formal risk assessment of insurance companies or groups carrying on business in the U.K. After each risk assessment, the FSA will inform the insurer of its views on the insurer’s risk profile. This will include details of any remedial action that the FSA requires and the likely consequences if this action is not taken.

 

The FSA also supervises the management of insurance companies through the approved persons regime, by which any appointment of persons to perform certain specified “controlled functions” within a regulated entity, must be approved by the FSA.

 

In addition, in January 2005, the FSA began to supervise the sale of general insurance, including payment protection insurance and mortgage insurance. Under FSA rules, persons who are involved in the sale of general insurance (including insurers and distributors) are prohibited from offering or accepting any inducement in connection with the sale of general insurance that is likely to conflict materially with their duties to insureds. Although the rules do not generally require disclosure of broker compensation, the insurer or distributor must disclose broker compensation at the insured’s request.

 

Solvency requirements

 

Under FSA rules, insurance companies must maintain a minimum amount of capital resources for solvency purposes at all times, the calculation of which in any particular case depends on the type, amount and claims history of insurance business a company writes. Failure to maintain the required minimum amount of capital resources is one of the grounds on which wide powers of intervention conferred upon the FSA may be exercised. In addition, an insurer that is part of a group is required to perform and submit to the FSA a capital resources calculation return in respect of the following:

 

    The solvency capital resources available to the European group to which the U.K. insurance company belongs. The European group is defined by reference to the U.K. insurance company’s ultimate parent company domiciled in the European Economic Area. Currently, this requirement is only a reporting requirement. However, after December 31, 2006, the FSA will be required to take action where the solvency capital requirements of the European group exceed that group’s available capital resources.

 

    The solvency capital resources available to the worldwide group to which the U.K. insurance company belongs. The worldwide group is defined by reference to the U.K. insurance company’s ultimate insurance parent company. This requirement is only a reporting requirement.

 

65


Table of Contents

Restrictions on dividend payments

 

English company law prohibits our U.K. subsidiaries from declaring a dividend to their stockholders unless they have “profits available for distribution.” The determination of whether a company has profits available for distribution is based on its accumulated realized profits less its accumulated realized losses.

 

Change of control

 

The acquisition of “control” of any U.K. insurance company will require FSA approval. For these purposes, a party that “controls” a U.K. insurance company includes any company or individual that (together with its or his associates) directly or indirectly acquires 10% or more of the shares in a U.K. authorized insurance company or its parent company, or is entitled to exercise or control the exercise of 10% or more of the voting power in such authorized insurance company or its parent company. In considering whether to approve an application for approval, the FSA must be satisfied that both the acquirer is a fit and proper person to have such “control” and that the interests of consumers would not be threatened by such acquisition of “control.” Failure to make the relevant prior application could result in action being taken against our U.K. subsidiaries by the FSA.

 

Intervention and enforcement

 

The FSA has extensive powers to intervene in the affairs of an insurance company or authorized person and has the power, among other things, to enforce, and take disciplinary measures in respect of, breaches of its rules.

 

Mortgage Insurance

 

State regulation

 

General

 

Mortgage insurers generally are restricted by state insurance laws and regulations to writing mortgage insurance business only. This restriction prohibits our mortgage insurance subsidiaries from directly writing other types of insurance. Mortgage insurers are not subject to the NAIC’s risk-based capital requirements, but are subject to other capital requirements placed directly on mortgage insurers. Generally, mortgage insurers are required by certain states and other regulators to maintain a risk in-force to capital ratio not to exceed 25:1. As of December 31, 2005, none of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries had a risk in-force to capital ratio in excess of 25:1.

 

Reserves

 

Our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries are required under state insurance laws to establish a special statutory contingency reserve in their statutory financial statements to provide for losses in the event of significant economic declines. Annual additions to the statutory contingency reserve must equal the greater of (i) 50% of earned premiums or (ii) the required level of policyholders position, as defined by state insurance laws. These contingency reserves generally are held until the earlier of (i) the time that loss ratios exceed 35% or (ii) ten years. The statutory contingency reserve as of December 31, 2005 for our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries was approximately $2.4 billion. This reserve reduces our policyholder surplus.

 

Federal regulation

 

In addition to federal laws that directly affect mortgage insurers, private mortgage insurers are affected indirectly by federal legislation and regulation affecting mortgage originators and lenders, by purchasers of mortgage loans such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and by governmental insurers such as the FHA and VA. For example, changes in federal housing legislation and other laws and regulations that affect the demand for private mortgage insurance may have a material effect on private mortgage insurers. Legislation or regulation that increases the number of people eligible for FHA or VA mortgages could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to compete with the FHA or VA.

 

66


Table of Contents

The Homeowners Protection Act provides for the automatic termination, or cancellation upon a borrower’s request, of private mortgage insurance upon satisfaction of certain conditions. The Homeowners Protection Act applies to owner-occupied residential mortgage loans regardless of lien priority and to borrower-paid mortgage insurance closed after July 29, 1999. FHA loans are not covered by the Homeowners Protection Act. Under the Homeowners Protection Act, automatic termination of mortgage insurance would generally occur once the loan-to-value ratio reaches 78%. A borrower generally may request cancellation of mortgage insurance once the loan- to-value reaches 80% of the home’s original value or when actual payments reduce the loan balance to 80% of the home’s original value, whichever occurs earlier. For borrower-initiated cancellation of mortgage insurance, the borrower must have a “good payment history” as defined by the Homeowners Protection Act.

 

The Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act of 1974, or RESPA, applies to most residential mortgages insured by private mortgage insurers. Mortgage insurance has been considered in some cases to be a “settlement service” for purposes of loans subject to RESPA. Subject to limited exceptions, RESPA precludes us from providing services to mortgage lenders free of charge, charging fees for services that are lower than their reasonable or fair market value, and paying fees for services that others provide that are higher than their reasonable or fair market value. In addition, RESPA prohibits persons from giving or accepting any portion or percentage of a charge for a real estate settlement service, other than for services actually performed. Although many states prohibit mortgage insurers from giving rebates, RESPA has been interpreted to cover many non-fee services as well. Both mortgage insurers and their customers are subject to the possible sanctions of this law, which may be enforced by HUD, state insurance departments and state attorneys general and also provides for private rights of action.

 

In July 2002, HUD proposed, but later withdrew, a rule under RESPA entitled “Simplifying and Improving the Process of Obtaining Mortgages to Reduce Settlement Costs to Consumers.” It is unclear whether a revised rule will be proposed and adopted or what impact it may have on the mortgage insurance industry.

 

Most originators of mortgage loans are required to collect and report data relating to a mortgage loan applicant’s race, nationality, gender, marital status and census tract to HUD or the Federal Reserve under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, or HMDA. The purpose of HMDA is to detect possible impermissible discrimination in home lending and, through disclosure, to discourage such discrimination. Mortgage insurers are not required to report HMDA data although, under the laws of several states, mortgage insurers currently are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of certain classifications. Mortgage insurers have, through MICA, entered voluntarily into an agreement with the Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council to report the same data on loans submitted for insurance as is required for most mortgage lenders under HMDA.

 

International regulation

 

Canada

 

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, or OSFI, provides oversight to all federally incorporated financial institutions, including our Canadian mortgage insurance company. OSFI does not have enforcement powers over market conduct issues in the insurance industry. Market conduct issues are a provincial responsibility. The Federal Bank Act, Insurance Companies Act and Trust and Loan Companies Act prohibits Canadian banks, trust companies and insurers from extending mortgage loans where the loan value exceeds 75% of the property’s value, unless mortgage insurance is obtained in connection with the loan. As a result, all mortgages issued by these financial institutions with loan-to-value ratio exceeding 75% must be insured by a qualified insurer or the CMHC. We currently are the only qualified private insurer.

 

In February 2005, as part of a periodic review of the federal financial services regulatory framework, the Canadian Department of Finance issued a consultation document seeking comment on a wide variety of potential initiatives relating to the regulation of financial services, including whether to remove the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance on all loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 75%. The consultation period

 

67


Table of Contents

concluded June 1, 2005; however, the Canadian government has not produced draft policy proposals or its recommendations for regulatory changes, if any. To the extent that amendments to this requirement are adopted, they are expected to become effective in October 2006. The removal of the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance, in whole or in part, may result in a reduction in the amount of business we write in future years in Canada.

 

We have an agreement with the Canadian government under which it guarantees the benefits payable under a mortgage insurance policy, less 10% of the original principal amount of an insured loan, in the event that we fail to make claim payments with respect to that loan because of insolvency. We pay the Canadian government a risk premium for this guarantee and make other payments to a reserve fund in respect of the government’s obligation. Because banks are not required to maintain regulatory capital on an asset backed by a sovereign guarantee, our 90% sovereign guarantee permits lenders purchasing our mortgage insurance to reduce their regulatory capital charges for credit risks on mortgages by 90%.

 

The legislative requirement in Canada to obtain mortgage insurance on high loan-to-value mortgages and the favorable capital treatment given to financial institutions because of our 90% sovereign guarantee effectively precludes these financial institutions from issuing simultaneous second mortgage products similar to those offered in the U.S.

 

Australia

 

APRA regulates all financial institutions in Australia, including general, life and mortgage insurance companies. Effective July 1, 2002, APRA provided new regulatory standards for all general insurers, including mortgage insurance companies. APRA’s license conditions currently require Australian mortgage insurance companies, including us, to be mono-line insurers, which are insurance companies that offer just one type of insurance product.

 

APRA also sets authorized capital levels and regulates corporate governance requirements, including our risk management strategy. In this regard, APRA reviews our management, controls, processes, reporting and methods by which all risks are managed, including a periodic review of outstanding insurance liabilities by an approved actuary, and a reinsurance management strategy, which outlines our use of reinsurance in Australia.

 

In addition, APRA determines the capital requirements for depository institutions and provides for reduced capital requirements for depository institutions that insure residential mortgages with an “acceptable” mortgage insurance company with loan-to-value ratios above 80% (in the case of standard loans) and, from October 1, 2004, with loan-to-value ratios above 60% (in the case of non-standard type loans). APRA’s regulations currently set out a number of circumstances in which a loan may be considered to be non-standard from a depositary institution’s perspective.

 

Effective January 1, 2006, APRA adopted new regulations regarding:

 

    Minimum capital requirements for mortgage insurance companies;

 

    Reporting obligations of mortgage insurance companies; and

 

    The conditions under which depositary institutions will be entitled to reduced capital requirements for insured loans.

 

The new regulations impose significantly higher minimum capital requirements on mortgage insurance companies to assure that they have sufficient capital to withstand a hypothetical three-year stress loss scenario. In addition, the new regulations increase mortgage insurance companies’ capital requirements for insured loans that are considered to be non-standard. Our Australian mortgage insurance subsidiary met these new minimum capital requirements as of January 1, 2006 by holding capital sufficient to maintain financial-strength ratings of “AA”

 

68


Table of Contents

(Very Strong) from S&P and Fitch and “Aa2” (Excellent) from Moody’s. Mortgage insurance companies that do not meet the new minimum regulatory capital requirements on the commencement date may apply for transition relief for up to three years from January 1, 2006.

 

The new regulations also impose additional quarterly reporting obligations on mortgage insurance companies with respect to risk profiles and reinsurance arrangements, amend the definition of an ‘acceptable’ mortgage insurance company and eliminate the reduced capital requirements for depositary institutions in the event that the mortgage insurance company has contractual recourse to the depositary institution or a member of its consolidated group. The new regulations did not make any change to the loan-to-value-ratios at which a loan may be eligible for reduced capital treatment if insured with an ‘acceptable’ mortgage insurance company (which ratios remain at 80% and 60% in the case of standard and non-standard loans, respectively).

 

United Kingdom and Europe

 

The U.K. is a member of the European Union and applies the harmonized system of regulation set out in the European Union directives. Our authorization to provide mortgage insurance in the U.K. enables us to offer our products in all the European Union member states, subject to certain regulatory requirements of the FSA and, in some cases, local regulatory requirements. We can provide mortgage insurance only in the classes for which we have authorization under applicable regulations and must maintain required risk capital reserves. We are also subject to the oversight of other regulatory agencies in other countries where we do business throughout Europe. For more information about U.K. insurance regulation that affects our mortgage subsidiaries that operate in the U.K., see “—U.K. Insurance Regulation.”

 

Other Non-U.S. Insurance Regulation

 

We operate in a number of countries around the world in addition to the U.S., Canada, Australia and Europe. These countries include Mexico, Japan, and Bermuda. Generally, our subsidiaries (and in some cases our branches) conducting business in these countries must obtain licenses from local regulatory authorities and satisfy local regulatory requirements, including those relating to rates, forms, capital, reserves and financial reporting.

 

Other Laws and Regulations

 

Securities regulation

 

Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries and certain policies and contracts offered by them, are subject to various levels of regulation under federal and state securities laws and self-regulatory organization rules administered by the SEC, state securities agencies and the NASD. Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries are investment advisers registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or applicable state securities laws. Certain of their respective employees are licensed as investment advisory representatives in the states where those employees have clients. One of our U.S. investment adviser subsidiaries also manages investment companies that are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940. In addition, some of our insurance company separate accounts are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Some annuity contracts and insurance policies issued by some of our U.S. subsidiaries are funded by separate accounts, the interests in which are registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Certain of our subsidiaries are registered and regulated as broker/dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are members of, and subject to regulation by, the NASD, as well as by various state and local regulators. The registered representatives of our broker/dealers are also regulated by the SEC and NASD and are further subject to applicable state and local laws.

 

These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investors in the securities markets and generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict the conduct of business for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions

 

69


Table of Contents

that may be imposed include suspension of individual employees, limitations on the activities in which the investment adviser or broker/dealer may engage, suspension or revocation of the investment adviser or broker/dealer registration, censure or fines. We may also be subject to similar laws and regulations in the states and other countries in which we provide investment advisory services, offer the products described above or conduct other securities-related activities.

 

Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries also sponsor and manage investment vehicles that rely on certain exemptions from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Securities Act of 1933. Nevertheless, certain provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Securities Act of 1933 apply to these investment vehicles and the securities issued by such vehicles. The Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Securities Act of 1933, including the rules promulgated thereunder, are subject to change which may affect our U.S. subsidiaries that sponsor and manage such investment vehicles.

 

Environmental considerations

 

As an owner and operator of real property, we are subject to extensive U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. environmental laws and regulations. Potential environmental liabilities and costs in connection with any required remediation of such properties also is an inherent risk in property ownership and operation. In addition, we hold equity interests in companies and have made loans secured by properties that could potentially be subject to environmental liabilities. We routinely have environmental assessments performed with respect to real estate being acquired for investment and real property to be acquired through foreclosure. We cannot provide assurance that unexpected environmental liabilities will not arise. However, based upon information currently available to us, we believe that any costs associated with compliance with environmental laws and regulations or any remediation of such properties will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

ERISA considerations

 

We provide certain products and services to certain employee benefit plans that are subject to ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code. As such, our activities are subject to the restrictions imposed by ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, including the requirement under ERISA that fiduciaries must perform their duties solely in the interests of ERISA plan participants and beneficiaries and the requirement under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code that fiduciaries may not cause a covered plan to engage in certain prohibited transactions with persons who have certain relationships with respect to such plans. The applicable provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code are subject to enforcement by the U.S. Department of Labor, the IRS and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

 

USA Patriot Act

 

The USA Patriot Act of 2001, or the Patriot Act, enacted in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, contains anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and mandates the implementation of various new regulations applicable to broker/dealers and other financial services companies including insurance companies. The Patriot Act seeks to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. Anti-money laundering laws outside of the U.S. contain similar provisions. The increased obligations of financial institutions to identify their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions, require the implementation and maintenance of internal practices, procedures and controls. We believe that we have implemented, and that we maintain, appropriate internal practices, procedures and controls to enable us to comply with the provisions of the Patriot Act. Certain additional requirements will be applicable under the Patriot Act in May 2006, and we will comply with these new provisions as they become applicable.

 

70


Table of Contents

Privacy of consumer information

 

U.S. federal and state laws and regulations require financial institutions, including insurance companies, to protect the security and confidentiality of consumer financial information and to notify consumers about their policies and practices relating to their collection and disclosure of consumer information and their policies relating to protecting the security and confidentiality of that information. Similarly, federal and state laws and regulations also govern the disclosure and security of consumer health information. In particular, regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulate the disclosure and use of protected health information by health insurers and others, the physical and procedural safeguards employed to protect the security of that information and the electronic transmission of such information. Congress and state legislatures are expected to consider additional legislation relating to privacy and other aspects of consumer information.

 

In Europe, the collection and use of personal information is subject to strict regulation. The European Union’s Data Protection Directive establishes a series of privacy requirements that EU member states are obliged to enact in their national legislation. European countries that are not EU member states have similar privacy requirements in their national laws. These requirements generally apply to all businesses, including insurance companies. In general, companies may process personal information only if consent has been obtained from the persons concerned or if certain other conditions are met. These other requirements include the provision of notice to customers and other persons concerning how their personal information is used and disclosed, limitations on the transfer of personal information to countries outside the European Union, registration with the national privacy authorities, where applicable, and the use of appropriate information security measures against the access or use of personal information by unauthorized persons. Similar laws and regulations protecting the security and confidentiality of consumer and financial information are also in effect in Canada, Australia and other countries in which we operate.

 

Glossary of Selected Insurance Terms

 

The following Glossary includes definitions of certain insurance, reinsurance, investment and other terms.

 

Account values

The amounts of investment products held for the benefit of policyholders or contract holders. For mutual funds, account value is equal to fair market value.

 

Accumulation period

The period during which an individual makes regular contributions to a deferred annuity or retirement plan. The period ends when the income payments begin.

 

Annualized first-year premiums

Premium payments related only to new sales and calculated as if they were consistently paid for the year of the sale even if they were actually paid for only a portion of the year of the sale.

 

Gross written premium

Total premiums for insurance written and reinsurance assumed during a given period.

 

New insurance written

The original principal balance of mortgages covered by newly issued primary mortgage insurance.

 

New risk written

The original principal balance of mortgage loans covered by newly issued primary mortgage insurance, multiplied by the applicable coverage percentage.

 

Risk in-force

The original principal amount of mortgage loans, multiplied by the coverage percentage under the mortgage insurance policies that remain in effect.

 

71


Table of Contents

Sales

The term “sales” means (1) annualized first-year premiums for term life insurance, long-term care insurance, and group life and health insurance; (2) new and additional premiums/deposits for universal life insurance, spread-based and variable products; (3) new deposits for managed assets; (4) written premiums gross of reinsurance and cancellations for payment protection insurance; and (5) new insurance written for mortgage insurance, which in each case reflects the amount of business the company generated during each period presented. Sales do not include renewal premiums on policies or contracts written during prior periods. We consider annualized first-year premiums, new premiums/deposits, written premiums and new insurance written to be measures of our operating performance because they represent a measure of new sales of insurance policies or contracts during a specified period, rather than a measure of our revenues or profitability during that period. This operating measure enables us to compare our operating performance across periods without regard to revenues or profitability related to policies or contracts sold in prior periods or from investments or other sources.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

Risks Relating to Our Businesses

 

Interest rate fluctuations could adversely affect our business and profitability.

 

Our insurance and investment products are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations and expose us to the risk that falling interest rates will reduce our “spread,” or the difference between the returns we earn on the investments that support our obligations under these products and the amounts that we must pay policyholders and contractholders. Because we may reduce the interest rates we credit on most of these products only at limited, pre-established intervals, and because some of them have guaranteed minimum crediting rates, declines in interest rates may adversely affect the profitability of those products. For example, interest rates declined to unusually low levels in 2003. Although interest rates increased in 2004 and 2005, they remain at low levels and limit our returns on our spread-based investment products.

 

During periods of increasing market interest rates, we may offer higher crediting rates on interest-sensitive products, such as universal life insurance and fixed annuities, and we may increase crediting rates on in-force products to keep these products competitive. In addition, rapidly rising interest rates may cause increased policy surrenders, withdrawals from life insurance policies and annuity contracts and requests for policy loans, as policyholders and contractholders shift assets into higher yielding investments. Increases in crediting rates, as well as surrenders and withdrawals, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our term life and long-term care insurance products also expose us to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. The pricing and expected future profitability of these products are based in part on expected investment returns. Over time, term life and long-term care insurance products generally produce positive cash flows as customers pay periodic premiums, which we invest as we receive them. Low interest rates may reduce our ability to achieve our targeted investment margins and may adversely affect the profitability of our term life and long-term care insurance products.

 

In the U.S. mortgage market, rising interest rates generally reduce the volume of new mortgage originations. New mortgage originations in this market were $3,120 billion and $2,920 billion for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This compares to $3,945 billion of new mortgage originations for the year ended December 31, 2003. We believe the decrease in mortgage originations since 2003 was principally driven by two factors. First, increasing interest rates in 2004 and 2005 made refinancing of

 

72


Table of Contents

existing mortgages less attractive to consumers than in recent years. Second, with historically low interest rates in 2002 and 2003, many mortgages for which refinancing would otherwise have been economically attractive were already refinanced. Further increases in interest rates could cause the volume of mortgage originations to decline further, which would have an adverse effect on our new mortgage insurance written.

 

Rising interest rates also can increase the monthly mortgage payments for insured homeowners with adjustable rate mortgages, or ARMs, which could have the effect of increasing default rates on ARM loans and thereby increasing our exposure on our mortgage insurance policies. This is particularly relevant in our non-U.S. mortgage insurance business, where ARMs are the predominant mortgage product. ARMs also have increased as a percentage of the U.S. mortgage loans that we insure.

 

Declining interest rates increase the rate at which insured borrowers refinance their existing mortgages, thereby resulting in cancellations of the mortgage insurance covering the refinanced loans. Declining interest rates may also contribute to home price appreciation, which may provide insured borrowers in the U.S. with the option of canceling their mortgage insurance coverage earlier than we anticipated in pricing that coverage. These cancellations could have an adverse effect on our results from our mortgage insurance business.

 

Interest rate fluctuations also could have an adverse effect on the results of our investment portfolio. During periods of declining market interest rates, the interest we receive on variable interest rate investments decreases. In addition, during those periods, we are forced to reinvest the cash we receive as interest or return of principal on our investments in lower-yielding high-grade instruments or in lower-credit instruments to maintain comparable returns. Issuers of fixed-income securities also may decide to prepay their obligations in order to borrow at lower market rates, which exacerbates the risk that we may have to invest the cash proceeds of these securities in lower-yielding or lower-credit instruments. Interest rates during 2003 reached an historic low and have increased through 2005. Our weighted average investment yield reflects this change and decreased from 5.8% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 5.5% and 5.6% for the years ended December, 31 2004 and 2005, respectively.

 

Downturns and volatility in equity markets could adversely affect our business and profitability.

 

Significant downturns and volatility in equity markets could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in two principal ways. First, market downturns and volatility may discourage purchases of separate account products, such as variable annuities and variable life insurance, that have returns linked to the performance of the equity markets and may cause some existing customers to withdraw cash values or reduce investments in those products.

 

Second, downturns and volatility in equity markets can have an adverse effect on the revenues and returns from our separate account and private asset management products and services. Because these products and services depend on fees related primarily to the value of assets under management, a decline in the equity markets could reduce our revenues by reducing the value of the investment assets we manage.

 

Defaults in our fixed-income securities and commercial mortgage loan portfolio may reduce our earnings.

 

Issuers of the fixed-income securities and commercial mortgage loans that we own may default on principal and interest payments. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had fixed maturities in or near default (where the issuer has missed payment of principal or interest or entered bankruptcy) with a fair value of $47 million and $58 million, respectively. An economic downturn, or a variety of other factors could cause declines in the value of our fixed maturities portfolio and cause our net earnings to decline.

 

73


Table of Contents

We recognized gross capital gains of $108 million, $90 million and $473 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We realized these capital gains in part to offset default-related losses during those periods. However, capital gains may not be available in the future, and if they are, we may elect not to recognize capital gains to offset losses.

 

A downgrade or a potential downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could result in a loss of business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Financial strength ratings, which various ratings organizations publish as measures of an insurance company’s ability to meet contractholder and policyholder obligations, are important to maintaining public confidence in our products, the ability to market our products and our competitive position. Our principal life insurance companies currently have financial strength ratings of “AA-” (Very Strong) from S&P and Fitch and “Aa3” (Excellent) from Moody’s. Our mortgage insurance companies currently have financial strength ratings of “AA” (Very Strong) from S&P and Fitch and “Aa2” (Excellent) from Moody’s. The “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of S&P’s 20 ratings categories, respectively. The “Aa2” and “Aa3” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Moody’s 21 ratings categories, respectively. The “AA” and “AA-” ratings are the third- and fourth-highest of Fitch’s 24 ratings categories.

 

A downgrade in our financial strength ratings, or the announced potential for a downgrade, could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in many ways, including:

 

    reducing new sales of insurance products, annuities and other investment products;

 

    adversely affecting our relationships with independent sales intermediaries and our dedicated sales specialists;

 

    materially increasing the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contractholders and policyholders;

 

    requiring us to reduce prices for many of our products and services to remain competitive; and

 

    adversely affecting our ability to obtain reinsurance or obtain reasonable pricing on reinsurance.

 

The charters of the Federal National Mortgage Corporation, or Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, only permit them to buy high loan-to-value mortgages that are insured by a “qualified insurer,” as determined by each of them. Their current rules effectively provide that they will accept mortgage insurance only from private mortgage insurers with financial strength ratings of at least “AA-” by S&P and “Aa3” by Moody’s. If our mortgage insurance companies’ financial strength ratings decrease below the thresholds established by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, we would not be able to insure mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. As of December 31, 2005, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased the majority of the flow loans we insured in the U.S. An inability to insure mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or their transfer of our existing policies to an alternative mortgage insurer, would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In 2003, the U.S. Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight announced a risk-based capital rule that treats credit enhancements issued by private mortgage insurers with financial strength ratings of “AAA” more favorably than those issued by “AA” rated insurers. Neither Fannie Mae nor Freddie Mac has adopted policies that distinguish between “AA” rated and “AAA” rated mortgage insurers. However, if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac adopts policies that treat “AAA” rated insurers more favorably than “AA” rated insurers, our competitive position may suffer.

 

In addition to the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries, ratings agencies also publish credit ratings for our company. The credit ratings have an impact on the interest rates we pay on the money we borrow. Therefore, a downgrade in our credit ratings could increase our cost of borrowing and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

74


Table of Contents

The ratings of our insurance subsidiaries are not evaluations directed to the protection of investors in our securities.

 

The ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described under “Business—Financial Strength Ratings” reflect each rating agency’s current opinion of each subsidiary’s financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations to policyholders and contractholders. These factors are of concern to policyholders, contractholders, agents, sales intermediaries and lenders. Ratings are not evaluations directed to the protection of investors in our securities. They are not ratings of our securities and should not be relied upon when making a decision to buy, hold or sell our securities. In addition, the standards used by rating agencies in determining financial strength are different from capital requirements set by state insurance regulators. We may need to take actions in response to changing standards set by any of the ratings agencies, as well as statutory capital requirements, which could cause our business and operations to suffer.

 

If our reserves for future policy claims are inadequate, we may be required to increase our reserve liabilities, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

We calculate and maintain reserves for estimated future payments of claims to our policyholders and contractholders in accordance with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices. We release these reserves as those future obligations are extinguished. The reserves we establish necessarily reflect estimates and actuarial assumptions with regard to our future experience. These estimates and actuarial assumptions involve the exercise of significant judgment. Our future financial results depend significantly upon the extent to which our actual future experience is consistent with the assumptions we have used in pricing our products and determining our reserves. Many factors can affect future experience, including economic and social conditions, inflation, healthcare costs, changes in doctrines of legal liability and damage awards in litigation. Therefore, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments.

 

We continually monitor our reserves. If we conclude that our reserves are insufficient to cover actual or expected policy and contract benefits and claims payments, we would be required to increase our reserves and incur income statement charges for the period in which we make the determination, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

As a holding company, we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us to pay dividends and to meet our obligations.

 

We act as a holding company for our insurance subsidiaries and do not have any significant operations of our own. Dividends from our subsidiaries and permitted payments to us under our tax sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to pay stockholder dividends and to meet our obligations. These obligations include our operating expenses, interest and principal on our current and any future borrowings and contract adjustment payments on our Equity Units. These obligations also include amounts we owe to GE under the tax matters agreement that we and GE entered into in connection with our IPO. If the cash we receive from our subsidiaries pursuant to dividend payment and tax sharing arrangements is insufficient for us to fund any of these obligations, we may be required to raise cash through the incurrence of debt, the issuance of additional equity or the sale of assets.

 

The payment of dividends and other distributions to us by our insurance subsidiaries is regulated by insurance laws and regulations. In general, dividends in excess of prescribed limits are deemed “extraordinary” and require insurance regulatory approval. In addition, insurance regulators may prohibit the payment of ordinary dividends or other payments by our insurance subsidiaries to us (such as a payment under a tax sharing agreement or for employee or other services) if they determine that such payment could be adverse to our policyholders or contractholders. The ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders, are also subject to various conditions imposed by the rating agencies for us to maintain our ratings.

 

75


Table of Contents

Some of our investments are relatively illiquid.

 

Our investments in privately placed fixed maturities, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, limited partnership interests and restricted investments held by securitization entities are relatively illiquid. These asset classes represented 34% of the carrying value of our total cash and invested assets as of December 31, 2005. If we require significant amounts of cash on short notice in excess of our normal cash requirements, we may have difficulty selling these investments in a timely manner, be forced to sell them for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize, or both. For example, our floating-rate funding agreements generally contain “put” provisions, through which the contractholder may terminate the funding agreement for any reason after giving notice within the contract’s specified notice period, which is generally 90 days. As of December 31, 2005, we had an aggregate of $2.7 billion of floating-rate funding agreements outstanding, compared to $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2004. Of the $2.7 billion aggregate amount outstanding as of December 31, 2005, $1.0 billion had put option features, including $558 million with put option features of 90 days. If an unexpected number of contractholders exercise this right and we are unable to access other liquidity sources, we may have to liquidate assets quickly. Our inability to quickly dispose of illiquid investments could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Intense competition could negatively affect our ability to maintain or increase our market share and profitability.

 

Our businesses are subject to intense competition. We believe the principal competitive factors in the sale of our products are product features, price, commission structure, marketing and distribution arrangements, brand, reputation, financial strength ratings and service.

 

Many other companies actively compete for sales in our protection and retirement income and investments markets, including other major insurers, banks, other financial institutions, mutual fund and money asset management firms and specialty providers. The principal direct and indirect competitors for our mortgage insurance business include other private mortgage insurers, as well as federal and state governmental and quasigovernmental agencies in the U.S., including the Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, and to a lesser degree, the Veterans Administration, or VA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We also compete in our mortgage insurance business with structured transactions in the capital markets and with other financial instruments designed to manage credit risk, such as credit default swaps and credit linked notes, with lenders who forego mortgage insurance, or self-insure, on loans held in their portfolios, and with lenders that provide mortgage reinsurance through captive mortgage reinsurance programs. In Canada and some European countries, our mortgage insurance business competes directly with government entities, which provide comparable mortgage insurance. Government entities with which we compete typically do not have the same capital requirements and do not have the same profit objectives as we do. Although private companies, such as our company, establish pricing terms for their products to achieve targeted returns, these government entities may offer products on terms designed to accomplish social or political objectives or reflect other non-economic goals.

 

In many of our product lines, we face competition from competitors that have greater market share or breadth of distribution, offer a broader range of products, services or features, assume a greater level of risk, have lower profitability expectations or have higher financial strength ratings than we do. Many competitors offer similar products and use similar distribution channels. The substantial expansion of banks’ and insurance companies’ distribution capacities and expansion of product features in recent years have intensified pressure on margins and production levels and have increased the level of competition in many of our business lines. In addition, in recent years, banks, insurance companies and other financial services companies, many of which offer products similar to ours and use similar distribution channels, have consolidated. Further consolidation among banks, insurance companies and other financial services companies could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations if the surviving entity requires more favorable terms than we had previously been offering to one or more of the combined companies or if it elects not to continue to do business with us following the consolidation.

 

 

76


Table of Contents

We may be unable to attract and retain independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists.

 

We distribute our products through financial intermediaries, independent producers and dedicated sales specialists. We compete with other financial institutions to attract and retain commercial relationships in each of these channels, and our success in competing for sales through these sales intermediaries depends upon factors such as the amount of sales commissions and fees we pay, the breadth of our product offerings, the strength of our brand, our perceived stability and our financial strength ratings, the marketing and services we provide to them and the strength of the relationships we maintain with individuals at those firms. From time to time, due to competitive forces, we have experienced unusually high attrition in particular sales channels for specific products, including long-term care insurance. An inability to recruit productive independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists, or our inability to retain strong relationships with the individual agents at our independent sales intermediaries, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Reinsurance may not be available, affordable or adequate to protect us against losses.

 

As part of our overall risk and capacity management strategy, we purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various business segments. Market conditions beyond our control determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection we purchase. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms which could adversely affect our ability to write future business.

 

If the counterparties to our reinsurance arrangements or to the derivative instruments we use to hedge our business risks default or fail to perform, we may be exposed to risks we had sought to mitigate, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We use reinsurance and derivative instruments to mitigate our risks in various circumstances. Reinsurance does not relieve us of our direct liability to our policyholders, even when the reinsurer is liable to us. Accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. We cannot assure you that our reinsurers will pay the reinsurance recoverable owed to us now or in the future or that they will pay these recoverables on a timely basis. A reinsurer’s insolvency, inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of its reinsurance agreement with us could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Prior to the completion of the IPO, we ceded to UFLIC, effective as of January 1, 2004, policy obligations under our structured settlement contracts, which had reserves of $12.0 billion, and our variable annuity contracts, which had general account reserves of $2.8 billion and separate account reserves of $7.9 billion, in each case as of December 31, 2003. These contracts represent substantially all of our contracts that were in-force as of December 31, 2003 for these products. In addition, effective as of January 1, 2004, we ceded to UFLIC policy obligations under a block of long-term care insurance policies that we reinsured from The Travelers Insurance Company, or Travelers, which had reserves of $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2003. UFLIC has established trust accounts for our benefit to secure its obligations under the reinsurance arrangements, and General Electric Capital Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of GE, or GE Capital, has agreed to maintain UFLIC’s risk-based capital above a specified minimum level. If UFLIC becomes insolvent notwithstanding this agreement, and the amounts in the trust accounts are insufficient to pay UFLIC’s obligations to us, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

 

In addition, we use derivative instruments to hedge various business risks. We enter into a variety of derivative instruments, including options, forwards, interest rate and currency swaps and options to enter into interest rate and currency swaps with a number of counterparties. If our counterparties fail or refuse to honor their obligations under the derivative instruments, our hedges of the related risk will be ineffective. Such failure could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

77


Table of Contents

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and international securities markets could negatively affect our profitability.

 

Our international operations generate revenues denominated in local currencies. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, 20%, 19% and 18% of our revenues, respectively, and 32%, 29% and 26% of our net earnings from continuing operations, respectively, were generated by our international operations. We generally invest cash generated by our international operations in securities denominated in local currencies. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, approximately 8% and 8%, respectively, of our invested assets were held by our international operations and were invested primarily in non-U.S.-denominated securities. Although investing in securities denominated in local currencies limits the effect of currency exchange rate fluctuation on local operating results, we remain exposed to the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates as we translate the operating results of our foreign operations into our financial statements. We currently do not hedge this exposure, and as a result, period-to-period comparability of our results of operations is affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. For example, our net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2005 included approximately $21 million due to the favorable impact of changes in foreign exchange rates. In addition, because we derive a significant portion of our earnings from non-U.S.-denominated revenue, our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent the dollar value of non-U.S.-denominated revenue is reduced due to a strengthening U.S. dollar.

 

Our investments in non-U.S.-denominated securities are subject to fluctuations in non-U.S. securities and currency markets, and those markets can be volatile. Non-U.S. currency fluctuations also affect the value of any dividends paid by our non-U.S. subsidiaries to their parent companies in the U.S.

 

Our insurance businesses are heavily regulated, and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability and limit our growth.

 

Our insurance operations are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations. State insurance laws regulate most aspects of our U.S. insurance businesses, and our insurance subsidiaries are regulated by the insurance departments of the states in which they are domiciled and licensed. Our non-U.S. insurance operations are principally regulated by insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which they are domiciled.

 

State laws in the U.S. grant insurance regulatory authorities broad administrative powers with respect to, among other things:

 

    licensing companies and agents to transact business;

 

    calculating the value of assets to determine compliance with statutory requirements;

 

    mandating certain insurance benefits;

 

    regulating certain premium rates;

 

    reviewing and approving policy forms;

 

    regulating unfair trade and claims practices, including through the imposition of restrictions on marketing and sales practices, distribution arrangements and payment of inducements;

 

    establishing statutory capital and reserve requirements and solvency standards;

 

    fixing maximum interest rates on insurance policy loans and minimum rates for guaranteed crediting rates on life insurance policies and annuity contracts;

 

    approving changes in control of insurance companies;

 

    restricting the payment of dividends and other transactions between affiliates; and

 

    regulating the types, amounts and valuation of investments.

 

State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, regularly reexamine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, are often made for the benefit of the consumer at the expense of the insurer and thus could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

78


Table of Contents

In December 2004, the NAIC approved amendments to the NAIC’s model Producer Licensing Act. The amendments contain new disclosure requirements for producers regarding compensation arrangements. The NAIC amendments would require producers to disclose to customers, in certain circumstances, information concerning compensation arrangements. Certain states have adopted these or similar amendments, and legislation or regulation adopting such amendments has been proposed in other states. The NAIC also directed its Executive Task Force on Broker Activities to give further consideration to the development of additional requirements for recognition of a fiduciary responsibility on the part of producers, disclosure of all quotes received by a broker and disclosures relating to reinsurance arrangements between insurers and reinsurance companies affiliated with a producer. We cannot predict the effect that the NAIC’s recent compensation disclosure amendments or anticipated future activities in this area, at the NAIC or state level, will have on influencing future legal actions, changes to business practices or regulatory requirements applicable to us.

 

Our mortgage insurance business is subject to additional laws and regulations. For a discussion of the risks associated with those laws and regulations, see “—Risks Relating to Our Mortgage Insurance Business—Changes in regulations that affect the mortgage insurance business could affect our operations significantly and could reduce the demand for mortgage insurance.”

 

Currently, the U.S. federal government does not regulate directly the business of insurance. However, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. These areas include financial services regulation, securities regulation, pension regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation. In addition, various forms of direct federal regulation of insurance have been proposed. These proposals include “The State Modernization and Regulatory Transparency Act,” which would maintain state-based regulation of insurance but would affect state regulation of certain aspects of the business of insurance including rates, agent and company licensing, and market conduct examinations. We cannot predict whether this or other proposals will be adopted, or what impact, if any, such proposals or, if enacted, such laws may have on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

 

Our international operations are subject to regulation in the relevant jurisdictions in which they operate, which in many ways is similar to that of the state regulation outlined above.

 

Many of our customers and independent sales intermediaries also operate in regulated environments. Changes in the regulations that affect their operations also may affect our business relationships with them and their ability to purchase or to distribute our products. Accordingly, these changes could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.

 

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may increase materially our direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Legal and regulatory investigations and actions are increasingly common in the insurance business and may result in financial losses and harm our reputation.

 

We face a significant risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including the risk of class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, that our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance business, such as captive reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violate RESPA or related state anti-inducement laws and

 

79


Table of Contents

breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. We are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas and books and record examinations, from state, federal and international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Recently, the insurance industry has become the focus of increased scrutiny by regulatory and law enforcement authorities concerning certain practices within the insurance industry. In this regard, in May 2005, we received a subpoena from the Northeast Regional Office of the SEC, requiring the production of documents related to “certain loss mitigation insurance products,” such as finite risk reinsurance. We responded to the SEC’s subpoena in June and July 2005. Additionally, in May and June 2005, certain of our subsidiaries received information requests from the State of Delaware Department of Insurance and the State of Connecticut Insurance Department on the same general subject, to which we responded. In June 2005, GE received a subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, also on the same general subject. In the subpoena, GE is defined as including, among other things, its subsidiaries and affiliates. We cooperated with GE in connection with GE’s response to the subpoena. In May 2005, each of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries received an information request from the State of New York Insurance Department with respect to captive reinsurance transactions with lender-affiliated reinsurers and other types of arrangements in which lending institutions receive from our subsidiary any form of payment, compensation or other consideration in connection with issuance of a policy covering a mortgagor of the lending institution. In February 2006, we received a follow-up industry-wide inquiry from New York requesting supplemental information. In addition, in January 2006, as part of an industry-wide review, our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiary received an administrative subpoena from the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which has jurisdiction over insurance matters, with respect to our reinsurance arrangements, including captive reinsurance transactions. We have responded or are responding to these industry-wide regulatory inquiries.

 

Antitrust authorities in the U.K. are currently conducting an investigation of the store card sector of the retail financial services market in the U.K. to ascertain whether there are any characteristics that restrict or distort competition in this market. As part of the investigation, the authorities also are examining various insurance products sold to store card holders. These products include payment protection insurance, purchase protection and price protection. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business currently underwrites these products that are sold by one of the largest providers of store cards in the U.K. As part of that investigation, we responded to an information request. The provisional findings of the U.K. antitrust authorities were published in September 2005 and concluded that there are features in the store card sector that have an adverse effect on competition in this sector. The provisional findings contained proposed remedies (aimed at mitigating these adverse effects on competition) relating to the various insurance products sold to store card holders.

 

The U.K. antitrust authorities have also conducted an initial review of the payment protection insurance sector. This review was in response to a complaint lodged under U.K. anti trust law by a consumer activist group (the Citizens Advice Bureau). As part of the first stages of the review, we responded to an information request. A more detailed review is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 2006.

 

Also, in the U.K., the Financial Services Authority has conducted an industry-wide review of payment protection insurance products, as well as an industry-wide review of non-traditional financial arrangements. The report issued by the Financial Services Authority was critical of some of the sales methods used by distributors of payment protection insurance products. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business only acts as an underwriter of payment protection insurance products. The Financial Services Authority has also written to the

 

80


Table of Contents

distributors and underwriters of payment protection insurance products directing that certain corrective actions be undertaken. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business has responded to such a letter from the Financial Services Authority.

 

We cannot predict the effect these investigations may have on either the store card sector in the U.K. and the sale of insurance products linked to store cards or the wider payment protection insurance sector in the U.K or our payment protection business in the U.K.

 

We cannot assure you that the current investigations and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. It is also possible that related investigations and proceedings may be commenced in the future, and we could become subject to further investigations and have lawsuits filed or enforcement actions initiated against us. In addition, increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation. For example, the NAIC and certain state insurance departments have adopted or proposed additional reporting and disclosure requirements relating to finite risk reinsurance.

 

We have significant operations in India that could be adversely affected by changes in the political or economic stability of India or government policies in India, the U.S. or Europe.

 

Through an arrangement with an outsourcing provider, we have a substantial team of professionals in India who provide a variety of services to our insurance operations, including customer service, transaction processing, and functional support including finance, investment research, actuarial, risk and marketing. A significant change in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies could adversely affect business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular.

 

The political or regulatory climate in the U.S., Europe or elsewhere also could change so that it would not be practical or legal for us to use international operations centers, such as call centers. For example, changes in privacy regulations, or more stringent interpretation or enforcement of these regulations, could require us to curtail our use of low-cost operations in India to service our businesses, which could reduce the cost benefits we currently realize from using these operations.

 

Our computer systems may fail or their security may be compromised, which could damage our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

 

Our business is highly dependent upon the uninterrupted operation of our computer systems. We rely on these systems throughout our business for a variety of functions, including processing claims and applications, providing information to customers and distributors, performing actuarial analyses and maintaining financial records. Despite the implementation of security measures, our computer systems may be vulnerable to physical or electronic intrusions, computer viruses or other attacks, programming errors and similar disruptive problems. The failure of these systems for any reason could cause significant interruptions to our operations, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

 

We retain confidential information in our computer systems, and we rely on sophisticated commercial technologies to maintain the security of those systems. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures and penetrate our computer systems could access, view, misappropriate, alter, or delete any information in the systems, including personally identifiable customer information and proprietary business information. In addition, an increasing number of states and foreign countries require that customers be notified if a security breach results in the disclosure of personally identifiable customer information. Any compromise of the security of our computer systems that results in inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable customer information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, deter people from purchasing our products, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses.

 

81


Table of Contents

The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or a disease pandemic could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

 

We are exposed to various risks arising out of natural disasters, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods and tornadoes, man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and military actions and disease pandemics (such as could arise from the avian flu). For example, a natural or man-made disaster or a disease pandemic could lead to unexpected changes in persistency rates as policyholders and contractholders who are affected by the disaster may be unable to meet their contractual obligations, such as payment of premiums on our insurance policies, deposits into our investment products, and mortgage payments on loans insured by our mortgage insurance policies. They could also significantly increase our mortality and morbidity experience above the assumptions we used in pricing our insurance and investment products. The continued threat of terrorism and ongoing military actions may cause significant volatility in global financial markets, and a natural or man-made disaster or a disease pandemic could trigger an economic downturn in the areas directly or indirectly affected by the disaster. These consequences could, among other things, result in a decline in business and increased claims from those areas, as well as an adverse effect on home prices in those areas, which could result in increased loss experience in our mortgage insurance business. Disasters or a disease pandemic also could disrupt public and private infrastructure, including communications and financial services, which could disrupt our normal business operations.

 

A natural or man-made disaster or a disease pandemic also could disrupt the operations of our counterparties or result in increased prices for the products and services they provide to us. For example, a natural or man-made disaster or a disease pandemic could lead to increased reinsurance prices and potentially cause us to retain more risk than we otherwise would retain if we were able to obtain reinsurance at lower prices. In addition, a disaster or a disease pandemic could adversely affect the value of the assets in our investment portfolio if it affects companies’ ability to pay principal or interest on their securities. See “—We may face losses if there are significant deviations from our assumptions regarding the future persistency of our insurance policies and annuity contracts” and “—A deterioration in economic conditions or a decline in home price appreciation may adversely affect our loss experience in mortgage insurance.”

 

Risks Relating to Our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments Segments

 

We may face losses if morbidity rates, mortality rates or unemployment rates differ significantly from our pricing expectations.

 

We set prices for our insurance and some annuity products based upon expected claims and payment patterns, using assumptions for, among other things, morbidity rates, or likelihood of sickness, and mortality rates, or likelihood of death, of our policyholders and contractholders. The long-term profitability of these products depends upon how our actual experience compares with our pricing assumptions. For example, if morbidity rates are higher, or mortality rates are lower, than our pricing assumptions, we could be required to make greater payments under long-term care insurance policies and annuity contracts than we had projected. Conversely, if mortality rates are higher than our pricing assumptions, we could be required to make greater payments under our life and payment protection insurance policies and annuity contracts with guaranteed minimum death benefits than we had projected.

 

The risk that our claims experience may differ significantly from our pricing assumptions is particularly significant for our long-term care insurance products. Long-term care insurance policies provide for long-duration coverage and, therefore, our actual claims experience will emerge over many years after pricing assumptions have been established. Moreover, as a relatively new product in the market, long-term care insurance does not have the extensive claims experience history of life insurance, and as a result, our ability to forecast future claim rates for long-term care insurance is more limited than for life insurance.

 

In pricing our payment protection insurance, we also use assumptions regarding unemployment levels. If unemployment levels are higher than our pricing assumptions, the claims frequency could be higher for our payment protection insurance business than we had projected.

 

82


Table of Contents

We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred acquisition costs and the present value of future profits, which would increase our expenses and reduce profitability.

 

Deferred acquisition costs, or DAC, represent costs which vary with and are primarily related to the sale and issuance of our insurance policies and investment contracts that are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the related insurance policies. These costs include commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions, solicitation and printing costs, sales material and some support costs, such as underwriting and contract and policy issuance expenses. Under U.S. GAAP, DAC is subsequently amortized to income, over the lives of the underlying contracts, in relation to the anticipated recognition of premiums or gross profits. In addition, when we acquire a block of insurance policies or investment contracts, we assign a portion of the purchase price to the right to receive future net cash flows from existing insurance and investment contracts and policies. This intangible asset, called the present value of future profits, or PVFP, represents the actuarially estimated present value of future cash flows from the acquired policies. We amortize the value of this intangible asset in a manner similar to the amortization of DAC.

 

Our amortization of DAC and PVFP generally depends upon anticipated profits from investments, surrender and other policy and contract charges, mortality, morbidity and maintenance expense margins. Unfavorable experience with regard to expected expenses, investment returns, mortality, morbidity, withdrawals or lapses may cause us to increase the amortization of DAC or PVFP, or both, or to record a charge to increase benefit reserves.

 

We regularly review DAC and PVFP to determine if they are recoverable from future income. If these costs are not recoverable, they are charged to expenses in the financial period in which we make this determination. For example, if we determine that we are unable to recover DAC from profits over the life of a block of insurance policies or annuity contracts, or if withdrawals or surrender charges associated with early withdrawals do not fully offset the unamortized acquisition costs related to those policies or annuities, we would be required to recognize the additional DAC amortization as a current-period expense. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, we had $5.6 billion and $5.0 billion of DAC, and $0.7 billion and $0.7 billion of PVFP. Our net amortization of DAC and PVFP was $0.8 billion, $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion of DAC and PVFP for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

We may be required to recognize impairment in the value of our goodwill, which would increase our expenses and reduce our profitability.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the amount we paid to acquire our subsidiaries and other businesses over the fair value of their net assets at the date of the acquisition. Under U.S. GAAP, we test the carrying value of goodwill for impairment at least annually at the “reporting unit” level, which is either an operating segment or a business one level below the operating segment. Goodwill is impaired if the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole is less than the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, plus the carrying value of goodwill, at the date of the test. For example, goodwill may become impaired if the fair value of a reporting unit as a whole were to decline by an amount greater than the decline in the value of its individual identifiable assets and liabilities. This may occur for various reasons, including changes in actual or expected earnings or cash flows of a reporting unit, generation of earnings by a reporting unit at a lower rate of return than similar businesses or declines in market prices for publicly traded businesses similar to our reporting units. If any portion of our goodwill becomes impaired, we would be required to recognize the amount of the impairment as a current-period expense.

 

Our reputation in the long-term care insurance market may be adversely affected if we were to raise premiums on our in-force long-term care insurance products.

 

While we have not increased premiums on any direct in-force long-term care policies that we have issued, the terms of all our long-term care insurance policies permit us to increase premiums during the premium-paying period. Any premium increase could have an adverse effect on our reputation, our ability to market and sell new long-term care insurance products, our ability to retain existing policyholders, and morbidity trends.

 

83


Table of Contents

Medical advances, such as genetic research and diagnostic imaging, and related legislation could adversely affect the financial performance of our life insurance, long-term care insurance and annuities businesses.

 

Genetic research includes procedures focused on identifying key genes that render an individual predisposed to specific diseases, such as particular types of cancer and other diseases. Other medical advances, such as diagnostic imaging technologies, also may be used to detect the early onset of diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. We believe that if individuals learn through medical advances that they are predisposed to particular conditions that may reduce life longevity or require long-term care, they will be more likely to purchase our life and long-term care insurance policies or not to permit existing polices to lapse. In contrast, if individuals learn that they lack the genetic predisposition to develop the conditions that reduce longevity or require long-term care, they will be less likely to purchase our life and long-term care insurance products but more likely to purchase certain annuity products. In addition, such individuals that are existing policyholders will be more likely to permit their policies to lapse.

 

If we were to gain access to the same genetic or medical information as our prospective policyholders and contractholders, then we would be able to take this information into account in pricing our life and long-term care insurance policies and annuity contracts. However, there are a number of regulatory proposals that would make genetic and other medical information confidential and unavailable to insurance companies. The U.S. Senate has approved a bill that would prohibit group health plans, health insurers and employers from making enrollment decisions or adjusting premiums on the basis of genetic testing information. This legislation is now pending before a committee at the House of Representatives. Legislators in certain states also have introduced similar legislation. If these regulatory proposals were enacted, prospective policyholders and contractholders would only disclose this information if they chose to do so voluntarily. These factors could lead us to reduce sales of products affected by these regulatory proposals and could result in a deterioration of the risk profile of our portfolio, which could lead to payments to our policyholders and contractholders that are higher than we anticipated.

 

Medical advances also could lead to new forms of preventative care. Preventative care could extend the life and improve the overall health of individuals. If this were to occur, the duration of payments under certain of our annuity products likely would increase, thereby reducing net earnings in that business.

 

We may face losses if there are significant deviations from our assumptions regarding the future persistency of our insurance policies and annuity contracts.

 

The prices and expected future profitability of our insurance and deferred annuity products are based in part upon expected patterns of premiums, expenses and benefits, using a number of assumptions, including those related to persistency, which is the probability that a policy or contract will remain in-force from one period to the next. The effect of persistency on profitability varies for different products. For most of our life insurance, group life and health insurance, and deferred annuity products, actual persistency that is lower than our persistency assumptions could have an adverse impact on profitability, especially in the early years of a policy or contract primarily because we would be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses we deferred in connection with the acquisition of the policy or contract. For our life insurance policies, increased persistency that is the result of the sale of policies to third parties that continue to make premium payments on policies that would otherwise have lapsed, also known as life settlements, could have an adverse impact on profitability because of the higher claims rate associated with settled policies. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, persistency in our life insurance and fixed annuity businesses has been slightly higher than we assumed, and persistency in our variable annuity and certain group life and health insurance products has been slightly lower than we had assumed.

 

For our long-term care insurance and some other health insurance policies, actual persistency in later policy durations that is higher than our persistency assumptions could have a negative impact on profitability. If these policies remain in-force longer than we assumed, then we could be required to make greater benefit payments than we had anticipated when we priced these products. This risk is particularly significant in our long-term care insurance business because we do not have the experience history that we have in many of our other businesses.

 

84


Table of Contents

As a result, our ability to predict persistency for long-term care insurance is more limited than for many other products. Some of our long-term care insurance policies have experienced higher persistency than we had assumed, which has resulted in adverse claims experience.

 

Because our assumptions regarding persistency experience are inherently uncertain, reserves for future policy benefits and claims may prove to be inadequate if actual persistency experience is different from those assumptions. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums during the life of the policy or contract, we cannot guarantee that these increases would be sufficient to maintain profitability. Moreover, many of our products do not permit us to increase premiums or limit those increases during the life of the policy or contract. Significant deviations in experience from pricing expectations regarding persistency could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products.

 

Regulation XXX may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations by requiring us to increase our statutory reserves for term life and universal life insurance or incur higher operating costs.

 

The Model Regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” requires insurers to establish additional statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees. Virtually all our newly issued term and universal life insurance business is now affected by Regulation XXX.

 

In response to this regulation, we have increased term and universal life insurance statutory reserves and changed our premium rates for term life insurance products. We also have implemented reinsurance and capital management actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX. However, we cannot assure you that there will not be regulatory or other challenges to the actions we have taken to date. The result of those challenges could require us to increase statutory reserves or incur higher operating costs. Any change to or repeal of Regulation XXX could reduce the competitive advantage of our reinsurance and capital management actions in response to Regulation XXX and could adversely affect our market position in the life insurance market.

 

We also cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to implement actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX on future sales of term and universal life insurance products. If we are unable to continue to implement those actions, we may be required to increase statutory reserves, incur higher operating costs than we currently anticipate, or reduce our sales of these products. We also may have to implement measures that may be disruptive to our business. For example, because term and universal life insurance are particularly price-sensitive products, any increase in premiums charged on these products in order to compensate us for the increased statutory reserve requirements or higher costs of reinsurance may result in a significant loss of volume and adversely affect our life insurance operations.

 

If demand for long-term care insurance continues to decline, we will not be able to execute our strategy to expand our long-term care business.

 

We have devoted significant resources to developing our long-term care insurance business, and our growth strategy relies partly upon continued growth of the sale of this product. In recent years, however, sales of individual long-term care insurance have declined. Annualized first-year premiums for individual long-term care insurance achieved a historical high in 2002 at approximately $1.0 billion and decreased by 35% to $661 million in 2005, according to LIMRA International. We believe this decrease was due primarily to decisions by several providers to cease offering long-term care insurance, to raise premiums on in-force policies and/or to introduce new products with higher prices. These actions resulted in decreased purchases of long-term care insurance products and have caused some distributors to reduce their sales focus on these products. As a result, our annualized first-year premiums of long-term care insurance have remained relatively flat from 2004 to 2005. If the market for long-term care insurance continues to decline, we may be unable to realize our growth strategy in this area and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

85


Table of Contents

Changes in tax laws could make some of our products less attractive to consumers.

 

Changes in tax laws could make some of our products less attractive to consumers. For example, in May 2003, U.S. President George Bush signed into law the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, which reduced the federal income tax that investors are required to pay on long-term capital gains and on some dividends paid on stock. This reduction may provide an incentive for some of our customers and potential customers to shift assets into mutual funds and away from products, including annuities, designed to defer taxes payable on investment returns. Because the income taxes payable on long-term capital gains and some dividends paid on stock have been reduced, investors may decide that the tax-deferral benefits of annuity contracts are less advantageous than the potential after-tax income benefits of mutual funds or other investment products that provide dividends and long-term capital gains. A shift away from annuity contracts and other tax-deferred products would reduce our income from sales of these products, as well as the assets upon which we earn investment income.

 

The President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform made two alternative proposals in 2005 that, while not currently reflected in pending legislation, would create uncertainty for, and without further refinement would adversely affect, the attractiveness of some of our products that offer tax advantages under current law. We cannot predict whether these proposals or any other legislation will be enacted, what the specific terms of any such legislation will be or how, if at all, this legislation or any other legislation could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Changes in U.S. federal and state securities laws may affect our operations and our profitability.

 

U.S. federal and state securities laws apply to investment products that are also “securities,” including variable annuities and variable life insurance policies. As a result, some of our subsidiaries and the policies and contracts they offer are subject to regulation under these federal and state securities laws. Our insurance subsidiaries’ separate accounts are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Some variable annuity contracts and all variable life insurance policies issued by our insurance subsidiaries also are registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Other subsidiaries are registered as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are members of, and subject to, regulation by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. In addition, some of our subsidiaries also are registered as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

 

Securities laws and regulations are primarily intended to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect investors in the securities markets or investment advisory or brokerage clients. These laws and regulations generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict the conduct of business for failure to comply with those laws and regulations. Changes to these laws or regulations that restrict the conduct of our business could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Relating to Our Mortgage Insurance Segment

 

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and a small number of large mortgage lenders exert significant influence over the U.S. mortgage insurance market.

 

Our mortgage insurance products protect mortgage lenders and investors from default-related losses on residential first mortgage loans made primarily to home buyers with high loan-to-value mortgages—generally, those home buyers who make down payments of less than 20% of their home’s purchase price. The largest purchasers and guarantors of mortgage loans in the U.S. are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were created by Congressional charter to ensure that mortgage lenders have sufficient funds to continue to finance home purchases. For the first nine months of 2005, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased approximately 28.1% of all the mortgage loans originated in the U.S., as compared to 36.1% for 2004, according to statistics published by Inside the GSEs. We believe the significant reduction in the percentage of mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has

 

86


Table of Contents

reduced the market size for flow private mortgage insurance. Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s charters generally prohibit them from purchasing any mortgage with a face amount that exceeds 80% of the home’s value, unless that mortgage is insured by a qualified insurer or the mortgage seller retains at least a 10% participation in the loan or agrees to repurchase the loan in the event of default. As a result, high loan-to-value mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac generally are insured with private mortgage insurance. These provisions in Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s charters create much of the demand for private mortgage insurance in the U.S. As of December 31, 2005, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased the majority of the flow mortgage loans that we insured. As a result, a change in these provisions relating to their purchase or guarantee activity could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In addition, increasing consolidation among mortgage lenders in recent years has resulted in significant customer concentration for U.S. mortgage insurers. Our top ten lenders accounted for an aggregate of 36% of our flow new insurance written for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to 27% for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

As a result of the significant concentration in mortgage originators and purchasers, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the largest mortgage lenders possess substantial market power which enables them to influence our business and the mortgage insurance industry in general. Although we actively monitor and develop our relationships with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and our largest mortgage lending customers, a deterioration in any of these relationships, or the loss of business from any of our key customers, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if the FHLB’s reduce their purchases of mortgage loans, purchase uninsured mortgage loans or use other credit-enhancement products, this could have an adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Results from investigations into Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s accounting practices, disclosures and other matters may result in legislative or regulatory changes governing the operations of Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and other government-sponsored enterprises, which could adversely affect the results of our U.S. mortgage insurance business.

 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are subject to ongoing investigations regarding their accounting practices, disclosures and other matters. These investigations may contribute to changes in legislation and regulations governing their operations and the operations of other government-sponsored enterprises. The U.S. House of Representatives and a Senate Committee have passed separate bills that would increase regulatory oversight over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be enacted or adopted, how they may affect the operations of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other government-sponsored enterprises, or how they may affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations.

 

A decrease in the volume of high loan-to-value home mortgage originations or an increase in the volume of mortgage insurance cancellations could result in a decline in our revenue.

 

We provide mortgage insurance primarily for high loan-to-value mortgages. Factors that could lead to a decrease in the volume of high loan-to-value mortgage originations include:

 

    a change in the level of home mortgage interest rates;

 

    a decline in economic conditions generally, or in conditions in regional and local economies;

 

    the level of consumer confidence, which may be adversely affected by economic instability, war or terrorist events;

 

    declines in the price of homes;

 

    adverse population trends, including lower homeownership rates;

 

    high rates of home price appreciation, which in times of heavy refinancing affect whether refinanced loans have loan-to-value ratios that require mortgage insurance; and

 

87


Table of Contents
    changes in government housing policy encouraging loans to first-time homebuyers.

 

A decline in the volume of high loan-to-value mortgage originations would reduce the demand for mortgage insurance and, therefore, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In addition, a significant percentage of the premiums we earn each year in our U.S. mortgage insurance business are renewal premiums from insurance policies written in previous years. We estimate that approximately 85% of our U.S. gross premiums written for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, were renewal premiums. As a result, the length of time insurance remains in-force is an important determinant of our mortgage insurance revenues. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and many other mortgage investors in the U.S. generally permit a homeowner to ask his loan servicer to cancel his mortgage insurance when the principal amount of the mortgage falls below 80% of the home’s value. Factors that tend to reduce the length of time our mortgage insurance remains in-force include:

 

    declining interest rates, which may result in the refinancing of the mortgages underlying our insurance policies with new mortgage loans that may not require mortgage insurance or that we do not insure;

 

    significant appreciation in the value of homes, which causes the size of the mortgage to decrease below 80% of the value of the home and enables the borrower to request cancellation of the mortgage insurance; and

 

    changes in mortgage insurance cancellation requirements under applicable federal law or mortgage insurance cancellation practices by mortgage lenders and investors.

 

Our U.S. policy persistency rates increased from 46% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 65% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. A decrease in persistency in the U.S. generally would reduce the amount of our insurance in-force and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. These factors are less significant in our international mortgage insurance operations because we generally receive a single payment for mortgage insurance at the time a loan closes, and this premium typically is not refundable if the policy is canceled.

 

Continued increases in the volume of “simultaneous second” mortgages could have an adverse effect on the U.S. market for mortgage insurance.

 

High loan-to-value mortgages can consist of two simultaneous loans, known as “simultaneous seconds,” comprising a first mortgage with a loan-to-value ratio of 80% and a simultaneous second mortgage for the excess portion of the loan, instead of a single mortgage with a loan-to-value ratio of more than 80%. Simultaneous second loans are sometimes referred to as “80-10-10 loans” because they often comprise a first mortgage with an 80% loan-to-value ratio, a second mortgage with a 10% loan-to-value ratio and the remaining 10% paid in cash by the buyer, rather than a single mortgage with a 90% loan-to-value ratio.

 

Over the past several years, the volume of simultaneous second loans as an alternative to loans requiring private mortgage insurance has increased substantially. We believe this recent increase reflects the following factors:

 

    the lower monthly cost of simultaneous second loans compared to the cost of mortgage insurance, due to a lower-interest-rate environment and the emerging popularity of 15- and 30-year amortizing and adjustable rate simultaneous seconds;

 

    the tax deductibility in most cases of interest on a second mortgage, in contrast to the non-deductibility of mortgage insurance payments;

 

    negative consumer, broker and realtor perceptions about mortgage insurance; and

 

    the desire by some investors to hold second mortgages.

 

88


Table of Contents

Further increases in the volume of simultaneous seconds may cause corresponding decreases in the use of mortgage insurance for high loan-to-value mortgages, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The amount of mortgage insurance we write could decline significantly if other alternatives to private mortgage insurance are used to protect against default risk or lower coverage levels of mortgage insurance are selected.

 

Mortgage default risks may be mitigated through a variety of alternatives to private mortgage insurance other than simultaneous second mortgages. These alternatives include:

 

    using government mortgage insurance programs, including those of the FHA, the VA and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, or CMHC;

 

    holding mortgages in their own loan portfolios and self-insuring;

 

    using programs, such as those offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, requiring lower mortgage insurance coverage levels;

 

    originating and securitizing loans in mortgage-backed securities whose underlying mortgages are not insured with private mortgage insurance or which are structured so that the risk of default lies with the investor, rather than a private mortgage insurer; and

 

    using credit default swaps or similar instruments, instead of private mortgage insurance, to transfer credit risk on mortgages.

 

A decline in the use of private mortgage insurance in connection with high loan-to-value home mortgages for any reason would reduce the demand for flow mortgage insurance. We believe in recent quarters there has been a reduction in this demand in part as the result of increasing originations of mortgages that do not meet the eligibility requirements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and mortgages that are securitized in mortgage-backed securities that do not use private mortgage insurance. A prolonged decline of this nature could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our claims expenses would increase and our results of operations would suffer if the rate of defaults on mortgages covered by our mortgage insurance increases or the severity of such defaults exceeds our expectations.

 

Our premium rates vary with the perceived risk of a claim on the insured loan, which takes into account factors such as the loan-to-value ratio, our long-term historical loss experience, whether the mortgage provides for fixed payments or variable payments, the term of the mortgage, the borrower’s credit history and the level of documentation and verification of the borrower’s income and assets. We establish renewal premium rates for the life of a mortgage insurance policy upon issuance, and we cannot cancel the policy or adjust the premiums after the policy is issued. As a result, we cannot offset the impact of unanticipated claims with premium increases on policies in-force, and we cannot refuse to renew mortgage insurance coverage. The premiums we agree to charge upon writing a mortgage insurance policy may not adequately compensate us for the risks and costs associated with the coverage we provide for the entire life of that policy.

 

The long-term profitability of our mortgage insurance business depends upon the accuracy of our pricing assumptions. If defaults on mortgages increase because of an economic downturn or for reasons we failed to take into account adequately, we would be required to make greater claim payments than we planned when we priced our policies. Future claims on our mortgage insurance policies may not match the assumptions made in our pricing. An increase in the amount or frequency of claims beyond the levels contemplated by our pricing assumptions could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In recent years, our results of operations have benefited from historically low loss ratios because of significant home price

 

89


Table of Contents

appreciation and low levels of defaults. Increases from these recent historic lows could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2005, approximately 76% of our U.S. mortgage insurance risk in-force and 67% of our international mortgage insurance risk in-force had not yet reached its anticipated highest claim frequency years, which are generally between the third and seventh year of the loan. As a result, we expect our loss experience on these loans will increase as policies continue to age. If the claim frequency on the risk in-force significantly exceeds the claim frequency that was assumed in setting premium rates, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows would be adversely affected.

 

We also provide mortgage insurance for “Alt A” loans and loans with an initial “Interest Only” payment option. Alt A loans are originated under programs in which there is a reduced level of verification or disclosure of the borrower’s income or assets. Alt A loans represented 5.1%, 2.8% and 1.9% of our U.S. risk in-force as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and we anticipate that there will be increased levels of Alt A loans in future periods. Alt A loans typically have a higher default rate than fully documented loans, and we generally charge higher premiums for mortgage insurance on Alt A loans than on fully documented loans. The Interest Only payment option allows the borrower flexibility to pay interest only or pay interest and as much principal as desired, during an initial period of time. We impose credit score, occupancy type and loan-to-value restrictions on these loans. Interest Only loans represented 3.3% of our U.S. risk in-force as of December 31, 2005 and 1.0% or less as of December 31, 2004 and prior. Although historical information is limited, we believe interest only loans may pose a higher risk of claims due to features such as deferred amortization of the loan. If defaults on Alt A or Interest Only loans are higher than the assumptions we made in pricing our mortgage insurance on those loans, then we would be required to make greater claims payments than we had projected, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

A deterioration in economic conditions or a decline in home price appreciation may adversely affect our loss experience in mortgage insurance.

 

Losses in our mortgage insurance business generally result from events, such as reduction of income, unemployment, divorce, illness and inability to manage credit and interest-rate levels that reduce a borrower’s ability to continue to make mortgage payments. The amount of the loss we suffer, if any, depends in part on whether the home of a borrower who defaults on a mortgage can be sold for an amount that will cover unpaid principal and interest and the expenses of the sale. A deterioration in economic conditions generally increases the likelihood that borrowers will not have sufficient income to pay their mortgages and can also adversely affect housing values, which increases our risk of loss. A decline in home price appreciation, whether or not in conjunction with deteriorating economic conditions, may also increase our risk of loss.

 

A substantial economic downturn, or decline in recent significant home-price appreciation across the entire U.S. or globally could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We also may be particularly affected by economic downturns or declines in recent significant home-price appreciation in states where a large portion of our business is concentrated. As of December 31, 2005, approximately 50% of our U.S. risk in-force was concentrated in 10 states with 9% in Florida, 7% in Texas and 6% in New York. Similarly, our mortgage insurance operations in Canada, Australia and Europe are concentrated primarily in or around the largest cities in those countries. Continued and prolonged adverse economic conditions or declines in recent significant home-price appreciation in these states or cities could result in high levels of claims and losses, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

90


Table of Contents

A significant portion of our risk in-force consists of loans with high loan-to-value ratios, which generally result in more and larger claims than loans with lower loan-to-value ratios.

 

Mortgage loans with higher loan-to-value ratios typically have claim incidence rates substantially higher than mortgage loans with lower loan-to-value ratios. In our U.S. mortgage insurance business as of December 31, 2005:

 

    19% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 95%;

 

    38% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 90% but less than or equal to 95%;

 

    41% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 80% but less than or equal to 90%; and

 

    2% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios less than or equal to 80%.

 

In Canada, Australia and New Zealand, the risks of having a portfolio with a significant portion of high loan-to-value mortgages are greater than in the U.S. and Europe because we generally agree to cover 100% of the losses associated with mortgage defaults in those markets, compared to percentages in the U.S. and Europe that are typically 12% to 35% of the loan amount. In our non-U.S. mortgage insurance business as of December 31, 2005:

 

    less than 2% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 95%;

 

    25% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 90% but less than or equal to 95%;

 

    36% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios greater than 80% but less than or equal to 90%; and

 

    37% of our risk in-force consisted of mortgage loans with original loan-to-value ratios less than or equal to 80%.

 

Although mortgage insurance premiums for higher loan-to-value ratio loans generally are higher than for loans with lower loan-to-value ratios, the difference in premium rates may not be sufficient to compensate us for the enhanced risks associated with mortgage loans bearing higher loan-to-value ratios.

 

We cede a portion of our U.S. mortgage insurance business to mortgage reinsurance companies affiliated with our mortgage lending customers, and this reduces our profitability.

 

We, like other mortgage insurers, offer opportunities to our mortgage lending customers that are designed to allow them to participate in the risks and rewards of the mortgage insurance business. Many of the major mortgage lenders with which we do business have established captive mortgage reinsurance subsidiaries. These reinsurance subsidiaries assume a portion of the risks associated with the lender’s insured mortgage loans in exchange for a percentage of the premiums. In most cases, our reinsurance coverage is an “excess of loss” arrangement with a limited band of exposure for the reinsurer. This means that we are required to pay the first layer of losses arising from defaults in the covered mortgages, the reinsurer indemnifies us for the next layer of losses, and we pay any losses in excess of the reinsurer’s obligations. The effect of these arrangements historically has been a reduction in the profitability and return on capital of this business to us. Approximately 61% of our U.S. primary new risk written as of December 31, 2005 was subject to captive mortgage reinsurance, compared to approximately 70% as of December 31, 2004. U.S. premiums ceded to these reinsurers were approximately $135 million, $143 million and $139 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These premium cessions have adversely affected our profitability and could further reduce profitability if the terms of these arrangements require greater premium cessions.

 

91


Table of Contents

If efforts by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce the need for mortgage insurance are successful, they could adversely affect the results of our U.S. mortgage insurance business.

 

Freddie Mac has sought changes to the provisions of its Congressional charter that requires private mortgage insurance for low-down-payment mortgages and has lobbied the U.S. Congress for amendments that would permit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to use alternative forms of default loss protection or otherwise forego the use of private mortgage insurance. In October 1998, the U.S. Congress passed legislation to amend Freddie Mac’s charter to give it flexibility to use credit enhancements other than private mortgage insurance for downpayment mortgages. Although this charter amendment was quickly repealed, we cannot predict whether similar legislation may be proposed or enacted in the future.

 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have the ability to implement new eligibility requirements for mortgage insurers. They also have the authority to increase or reduce required mortgage insurance coverage percentages and to alter or liberalize underwriting standards on low-down-payment mortgages they purchase. We cannot predict the extent to which any new requirements may be enacted or how they may affect the operations of our mortgage insurance business, our capital requirements and our products.

 

Changes in the policies of the Federal Home Loan Banks could reduce the demand for U.S. mortgage insurance.

 

The Federal Home Loan Banks, or FHLBs, purchase single-family conforming mortgage loans originated by participating member institutions. Although the FHLBs are not required to purchase insurance for mortgage loans, they currently use mortgage insurance on substantially all mortgage loans with a loan-to-value ratio above 80% and have become a source of new business for us. If the FHLBs were to reduce their purchases of mortgage loans, purchase uninsured mortgage loans or increase the loan-to-value ratio threshold above which they require mortgage insurance, the market for mortgage insurance could decrease, and our mortgage insurance business could be adversely affected.

 

We compete with government-owned and government-sponsored entities in our mortgage insurance business, and this may put us at a competitive disadvantage on pricing and other terms and conditions.

 

Our mortgage insurance business competes with many different government-owned and government sponsored entities in the U.S., Canada and some European countries. In the U.S., these entities include principally the FHA and, to a lesser degree, the VA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as local and state housing finance agencies. In Canada, we compete with the CMHC, a Crown corporation owned by the Canadian government. In Europe, these entities include public mortgage guarantee facilities in a number of countries.

 

Those competitors may establish pricing terms and business practices that may be influenced by motives such as advancing social housing policy or stabilizing the mortgage lending industry, which may not be consistent with maximizing return on capital or other profitability measures. In addition, those governmental entities typically do not have the same capital requirements that we and other mortgage insurance companies have and therefore may have financial flexibility in their pricing and capacity that could put us at a competitive disadvantage in some respects. In the event that a government-owned or sponsored entity in one of our markets determines to reduce prices significantly or alter the terms and conditions of its mortgage insurance or other credit enhancement products in furtherance of social or other goals rather than a profit motive, we may be unable to compete in that market effectively, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We compete in Canada with the CMHC, which is owned by the Canadian government and, as a sovereign entity, provides mortgage lenders with 100% capital relief from bank regulatory requirements on loans that it insures. In contrast, lenders receive only 90% capital relief on loans we insure. CMHC also operates the Canadian Mortgage Bond Program, which provides lenders the ability to efficiently guaranty and securitize their

 

92


Table of Contents

mortgage loan portfolios. If we are unable to effectively distinguish ourselves competitively with our Canadian mortgage lender customers, we may be unable to compete effectively with the CMHC as a result of the more favorable capital relief it can provide or the other products and incentives that it offers to lenders.

 

Changes in regulations that affect the mortgage insurance business could affect our operations significantly and could reduce the demand for mortgage insurance.

 

In addition to the general regulatory risks that are described above under “—Our insurance businesses are heavily regulated, and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability and limit our growth,” we are also affected by various additional regulations relating particularly to our mortgage insurance operations.

 

U.S. federal and state regulations affect the scope of our competitors’ operations, which has an effect on the size of the mortgage insurance market and the intensity of the competition in our mortgage insurance business. This competition includes not only other private mortgage insurers, but also U.S. federal and state governmental and quasi-governmental agencies, principally the FHA, and to a lesser degree, the VA, which are governed by federal regulations. Increases in the maximum loan amount that the FHA can insure, and reductions in the mortgage insurance premiums the FHA charges, can reduce the demand for private mortgage insurance. The FHA has also streamlined its down-payment formula and made FHA insurance more competitive with private mortgage insurance in areas with higher home prices. These and other legislative and regulatory changes could cause demand for private mortgage insurance to decrease.

 

Our U.S. mortgage insurance business, as a credit enhancement provider in the residential mortgage lending industry, also is subject to compliance with various federal and state consumer protection and insurance laws, including the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Homeowners Protection Act, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and others. Among other things, these laws prohibit payments for referrals of settlement service business, require fairness and non-discrimination in granting or facilitating the granting of credit, require cancellation of insurance and refund of unearned premiums under certain circumstances, govern the circumstances under which companies may obtain and use consumer credit information, and define the manner in which companies may pursue collection activities. Changes in these laws or regulations could adversely affect the operations and profitability of our mortgage insurance business. For example, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is considering a rule that would exempt certain mortgages that provide a single price for a package of settlement services from the prohibition in the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA, against payments for referrals of settlement service business. If mortgage insurance were included among the settlement services that, when offered as a package, would be exempt from this prohibition, then mortgage lenders would have greater leverage in obtaining business concessions from mortgage insurers.

 

In May 2002, the Office of Thrift Supervision amended its capital regulations to remove the 80% loan-to-value standard from the definition of “qualifying mortgage loan”, instead incorporating the federal Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate lending, which do not contain an explicit loan-to-value standard but provide that an institution should require credit enhancement for a loan with a loan-to-value equal to or exceeding 90%. The capital regulations assign a lower risk weight to qualifying mortgage loans than to non-qualifying loans. As a result, these amended regulations no longer penalize OTS-regulated institutions for retaining loans that have loan-to-value ratios between 80% and 90% without credit enhancements. Other regulators, including the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, also do not explicitly refer to a loan-to-value standard but do refer to the Interagency Guidelines.

 

Regulations in Canada require the use of mortgage insurance for all mortgage loans extended by banks, trust companies and insurers with loan-to-value ratios greater than 75%. In February 2005, as part of a periodic review of the federal financial services regulatory framework, the Canadian Department of Finance issued a consultation document seeking comment on a wide variety of potential initiatives relating to the regulation of financial services, including whether to remove the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance on all loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 75%. The removal of the statutory requirement for mortgage insurance, in whole or in part, may result in a reduction in the amount of business we write in future years in Canada.

 

93


Table of Contents

Our guarantee agreement with the Canadian government provides that we and the government are entitled to review the terms of the guarantee when certain pricing assumptions have changed or other events have occurred that cause either party to believe these changes or other events have resulted in unfairness, prejudice or obvious hardship. In this event, the agreement requires us to negotiate in good faith for six months to make such modifications as are required to remove or modify the unfairness, prejudice or obvious hardship. If we and the government are unable to agree on appropriate changes to the guarantee, the matter must be referred to binding arbitration and we cannot be sure of the outcome of any such arbitration. In addition, under the terms of the guarantee, the maximum amount of outstanding loans which can be covered by our policies that are guaranteed by the Canadian government is CDN $100 billion. We may reach the limit by the end of 2006 and have asked the Canadian government to increase this limit. Although we believe the Canadian government will increase this limit to preserve the guarantee and maintain competition in the Canadian mortgage industry, we cannot be sure that the limit will be increased at all or to an appropriate level or if any changes will be made to the terms of the guarantee in connection with such an increase. The failure of the Canadian government to increase the limit to an appropriate level on terms similar to the current guarantee is likely to have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue offering mortgage insurance products in Canada and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority, or APRA, regulates all financial institutions in Australia, including general, life and mortgage insurance companies. APRA also determines the minimum regulatory capital requirements for depository institutions. APRA’s current regulations provide for reduced capital requirements for depository institutions that insure residential mortgages with loan-to-value ratios above 80% (in the case of “standard” loans) and, from October 1, 2004, with loan-to-value ratios above 60% (in the case of “non-standard” type loans). APRA’s regulations currently require APRA-regulated lenders to determine the criteria for determining if a loan is a “non-standard” type loan within certain parameters determined by APRA.

 

We believe the revisions to a set of regulatory rules and procedures governing global bank capital standards that were introduced by the Basel Committee of the Bank for International Settlements, known as Basel II, may encourage growth of international mortgage insurance. Basel II has been designed to reward banks that have developed effective risk management systems by allowing them to hold less capital than banks with less effective systems. Basel II was finalized and issued in June 2004; however, its adoption by individual countries is ongoing. Therefore, we cannot predict the benefits that ultimately will be provided to lenders, or how any such benefits may affect the opportunities for the growth of mortgage insurance. If countries implement Basel II in a manner that does not reward lenders for using mortgage insurance as a credit risk mitigant on high loan-to-value mortgage loans, or if lenders conclude that mortgage insurance does not provide sufficient capital incentives, then we may have to revise our product offerings to meet the new requirements and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

 

Our U.S. mortgage insurance business could be adversely affected by legal actions under RESPA.

 

RESPA prohibits paying lenders for the referral of settlement services, including mortgage insurance. This precludes us from providing services to mortgage lenders free of charge, charging fees for services that are lower than their reasonable or fair market value, and paying fees for services that others provide that are higher than their reasonable or fair market value. In addition, RESPA prohibits persons from giving or accepting any portion or percentage of a charge for a real estate settlement service, other than for services actually performed. A number of lawsuits, including some that were class actions, have challenged the actions of private mortgage insurers, including our company, under RESPA, alleging that the insurers have provided or received products or services at improperly set prices in return for the referral of mortgage insurance. We and several other mortgage insurers, without admitting any wrongdoing, reached a settlement in these cases, which includes an injunction that prohibited certain specified practices and details the basis on which mortgage insurers may provide or receive agency pool insurance, captive mortgage reinsurance, contract underwriting and other products and services and be deemed to be in compliance with RESPA. The injunction expired on December 31, 2003, and it is possible that plaintiffs will institute new litigation against private mortgage insurers, including us, to renew the injunction or to seek damages

 

94


Table of Contents

under RESPA. We also cannot predict whether our competitors will change their pricing structure or business practices now that the injunction has expired, which could require us to alter our pricing structure or business practices in response to their actions or suffer a competitive disadvantage, or whether any services we or they provide to mortgage lenders could be found to violate RESPA or any future injunction that might be issued. In addition, U.S. federal and state officials are authorized to enforce RESPA and to seek civil and criminal penalties, and we cannot predict whether these proceedings might be brought against us or other mortgage insurers. Any such proceedings could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our U.S. mortgage insurance business could be adversely affected by legal actions under the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

 

Two actions have been filed against us in Illinois, each seeking certification of a nationwide class of consumers who allegedly were required to pay for our private mortgage insurance at a rate higher than our “lowest available rate,” based upon credit information we obtained. Each action alleges that the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, or the FCRA, requires notice to such borrowers and that we violated the FCRA by failing to give such notice. The plaintiffs in one action allege in the complaint that they are entitled to “actual damages” and “damages within the Court’s discretion of not more than $1,000 for each separate violation” of the FCRA. The plaintiffs in the other action allege that they are entitled to “appropriate actual, punitive and statutory damages” and “such other or further relief as the Court deems proper.” Similar cases also were filed against six other mortgage insurers. We have reached an agreement in principle to settle these cases. If an acceptable definitive settlement cannot be negotiated or approved by the courts, we intend to vigorously defend against the actions to which we are a party, but we cannot predict their outcome.

 

Potential liabilities in connection with our U.S. contract underwriting services could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We offer contract underwriting services to many of our mortgage lenders in the U.S., pursuant to which our employees and contractors work directly with the lender to determine whether the data relating to a borrower and a proposed loan contained in a mortgage loan application file complies with the lender’s loan underwriting guidelines or the investor’s loan purchase requirements. In connection with that service, we also compile the application data and submit it to the automated underwriting systems of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which independently analyze the data to determine if the proposed loan complies with their investor requirements.

 

Under the terms of our contract underwriting agreements, we agree to indemnify the lender against losses incurred in the event that we make material errors in determining whether loans processed by our contract underwriters meet specified underwriting or purchase criteria, subject to contractual limitations on liability. As a result, we assume credit and interest rate risk in connection with our contract underwriting services. Worsening economic conditions, a deterioration in the quality of our underwriting services or other factors could cause our contract underwriting liabilities to increase and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we have established reserves to provide for potential claims in connection with our contract underwriting services, we have limited historical experience that we can use to establish reserves for these potential liabilities, and these reserves may not be adequate to cover liabilities that may arise.

 

If the European mortgage insurance market does not grow as we expect, we will not be able to execute our strategy to expand our business into this market.

 

We have devoted resources to marketing our mortgage insurance products in Europe, and we plan to continue these efforts. Our growth strategy depends partly upon the development of favorable legislative and regulatory policies throughout Europe that support increased homeownership and provide capital relief for institutions that insure their mortgage loan portfolios with private mortgage insurance. In furtherance of these policies, we have collaborated with government agencies to develop bank regulatory capital requirements that provide incentives to lenders to implement risk transfer strategies such as mortgage insurance, as well as

 

95


Table of Contents

governmental policies that encourage homeownership as a wealth accumulation strategy for borrowers with limited resources to make large down payments. We have invested, and we will continue to invest, significant resources to advocate such a regulatory environment at the national and pan-European levels. However, if European legislative and regulatory agencies fail to adopt these policies, then the European markets for high loan-to-value lending and mortgage insurance may not expand as we currently anticipate, and our growth strategy in those markets may not be successful.

 

Risks Relating to Our Separation from GE

 

We only have the right to use the GE brand name and logo for a limited period of time. If we fail to establish a new, independently recognized brand name with a strong reputation in a timely manner, our revenue and profitability could decline.

 

Since the completion of the IPO, our corporate name has been “Genworth Financial, Inc.” We and our insurance and other subsidiaries may use the GE brand name and logo in marketing our products and services for only a limited period of time. Pursuant to a transitional trademark license agreement, GE granted us the right to use the “GE” mark and the “GE” monogram for up to five years after the IPO in connection with our products and services. GE also granted us the right to use “GE,” “General Electric” and “GE Capital” in the corporate names of our subsidiaries until December 2006 (which is twelve months after the date on which GE reduced its ownership to less than 20% of our outstanding common stock). As we complete such transition, we will cease using the GE name and logo in our sales and marketing materials and will deliver notices to our distributors and customers that the names of some of our insurance subsidiaries will change. When we cease using the GE brand name and logo and cease using “GE”, “General Electric” and “GE Capital” in the corporate names of our subsidiaries, we may not be able to maintain or enjoy comparable name recognition or status under our new brand. In addition, some of our existing policyholders, contractholders and other customers may choose to stop doing business with us, and other potential policyholders and contractholders may decide not to purchase our products because of our separation from GE (reflected in the name and logo changes), and our ability to attract and retain highly qualified independent sales intermediaries and dedicated sales specialists for our products may be adversely affected. Insurance regulators in the U.S. and the other countries where we do business also could require us to accelerate the transition to our independent brand. If we are unable to successfully manage the transition of our business to our new brand, our reputation among our independent sales intermediaries, customers and employees could be adversely affected.

 

The terms of our arrangements with GE may be more favorable than we would be able to obtain from an unaffiliated third-party. We may be unable to replace the services GE provides us in a timely manner or on comparable terms.

 

We and GE entered into a transition services agreement and other agreements in connection with the IPO. Pursuant to these arrangements, GE and its affiliates agreed to provide us with a variety of services, including investment management, treasury, payroll and other financial services, human resources and employee benefit services, legal services, information systems and network services, and procurement and sourcing support.

 

We negotiated these arrangements with GE in the context of a parent-subsidiary relationship. Although GE is contractually obligated to provide us with services during the terms of these arrangements, we cannot assure you that these services will be sustained at the same level after the expiration of those arrangements, or that we will be able to replace these services in a timely manner or on comparable terms. Other agreements with GE also govern the relationship between us and GE and provide for the allocation of employee benefit, tax and other liabilities and obligations attributable or related to periods or events prior to the IPO. They also contain terms and provisions that may be more favorable than terms and provisions we might have obtained in arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties. We have negotiated and are continuing to negotiate our own arrangements with third-party providers for services, and these arrangements could result in increased costs.

 

96


Table of Contents

We have agreed to make payments to GE based on the projected amounts of certain tax savings we expect to realize as a result of the IPO. We will remain obligated to make these payments even if we do not realize the related tax savings and the payments could be accelerated in the event of certain changes in control.

 

We entered into a tax matters agreement with GE in connection with the IPO. We refer to this agreement as the Tax Matters Agreement. Under the Tax Matters Agreement, we have an obligation to pay GE a fixed amount over approximately the next 16 years. This fixed obligation, the estimated present values of which were $379 million and $380 million as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, equals 80% (subject to a cumulative $640 million maximum amount) of the tax savings projected as a result of the IPO. Even if we fail to generate sufficient taxable income to realize the projected tax savings, we will remain obligated to pay GE, and this could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation. We could also, subject to regulatory approval, be required to pay GE on an accelerated basis in the event of certain changes in control of our company.

 

If certain of our service agreements with affiliates of GE are not extended on terms not materially less favorable to us when they are scheduled to expire in the next few years, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

In connection with the IPO, we entered into a series of arrangements with GE pursuant to which we provide a variety of additional services to GE in exchange for fees. These agreements are scheduled to expire at various times in 2006 and 2007, depending on the agreement. For a description of these arrangements, including the services provided, fees charged and expiration dates, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview—Separation from GE and related financial arrangements—Services provided to GE.” In the event that we are not able to extend these agreements, or the terms of any such extensions are materially less favorable to us, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

We derive a significant portion of the premiums in our payment protection insurance business from transactions with GE.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, GE’s consumer finance division and other related GE entities accounted for 23%, 25% and 13% of our payment protection insurance gross written premiums, respectively. In early 2004, we entered into a five-year agreement, subject to certain early termination provisions, that extends our relationship with GE’s consumer finance division and provides us with the right to be the exclusive provider of payment protection insurance in Europe for GE’s consumer finance operations in jurisdictions where we offer these products. However, if GE determines not to offer payment protection insurance, we may not be able to replace those revenues on a timely basis, and our financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

 

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

 

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and our Tax Matters Agreement with GE may discourage takeover attempts and business combinations that stockholders might consider in their best interests.

 

Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions that may have anti-takeover effects and may delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt that our stockholders might consider in their best interests. For example, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws:

 

    permit our board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock;

 

    limit the ability of stockholders to remove directors;

 

    limit the ability of stockholders to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

 

    limit the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders and take action by written consent; and

 

97


Table of Contents
    impose advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations of directors to be considered at stockholder meetings.

 

Under our Tax Matters Agreement with GE, if any person or group of persons other than GE or its affiliates gains the power to direct the management and policies of our company (other than through a sale of our stock by GE), we could become obligated immediately to pay to GE the total present value of all remaining tax benefit payments due to GE over the full term of the agreement. The estimated present value of our fixed obligation as of December 31, 2005 was $379 million. Similarly, if any person or group of persons other than us or our affiliates gains effective control of one of our subsidiaries (other than through a sale of our stock by GE), we could become obligated to pay to GE the total present value of all such payments due to GE allocable to that subsidiary, unless the subsidiary assumes the obligation to pay these future amounts under the Tax Matters Agreement and certain conditions are met. The acceleration of payments would be subject to the approval of certain state insurance regulators, and we are obligated to use our reasonable best efforts to seek these approvals. This feature of the agreement could adversely affect a potential merger or sale of our company. It could also limit our flexibility to dispose of one or more of our subsidiaries, with adverse implications for any business strategy dependent on such dispositions.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

We have no unresolved staff comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

We own our headquarters facility in Richmond, Virginia, which consists of approximately 461,000 square feet in four buildings, as well as several facilities with approximately 462,000 square feet in Lynchburg, Virginia. In addition, we lease approximately 750,000 square feet of office space in 63 locations throughout the U.S. We also own two buildings outside the U.S. with approximately 40,000 square feet, and we lease approximately 490,000 square feet in 63 locations outside the U.S.

 

Most of our leases in the U.S. and other countries have lease terms of three to five years, although some leases have terms of up to 17 years. Our aggregate annual rental expense under all these leases was $27 million during the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

We believe our properties are adequate for our business as presently conducted.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

We face a significant risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including the risk of class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, that our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance business, such as capital reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violate RESPA or related state anti-inducement laws, and breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships. We are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas and books and record examinations, from state, federal and

 

98


Table of Contents

international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Recently, the insurance industry has become the focus of increased scrutiny by regulatory and law enforcement authorities concerning certain practices within the insurance industry. In this regard, in May 2005, we received a subpoena from the Northeast Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission, requiring the production of documents related to “certain loss mitigation insurance products,” such as finite risk reinsurance. We responded to the SEC’s subpoena in June and July 2005. Additionally, in May and June 2005, certain of our subsidiaries received information requests from the State of Delaware Department of Insurance and the State of Connecticut Insurance Department on the same general subject, to which we responded. In June 2005, General Electric Company (GE) received a subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, also on the same general subject. In the subpoena, GE is defined as including, among other things, its subsidiaries and affiliates. We cooperated with GE in connection with GE’s response to the subpoena. In May 2005, each of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries received an information request from the State of New York Insurance Department with respect to captive reinsurance transactions with lender-affiliated reinsurers and other types of arrangements in which lending institutions receive from our subsidiary any form of payment, compensation or other consideration in connection with issuance of a policy covering a mortgagor of the lending institution. In February 2006, we received a follow-up industry-wide inquiry from New York requesting supplemental information. In addition, in January 2006 as part of an industry-wide review, our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiary received an administrative subpoena from the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which has jurisdiction over insurance matters, with respect to our reinsurance arrangements, including captive reinsurance transactions. We have responded or are responding to these industry-wide regulatory inquiries.

 

Antitrust authorities in the U.K. are currently conducting an investigation of the store card sector of the retail financial services market in the U.K. to ascertain whether there are any characteristics that restrict or distort competition in this market. As part of the investigation, the authorities also are examining various insurance products sold to store cardholders. These products include payment protection insurance, purchase protection and price protection. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business currently underwrites these products that are sold by one of the largest providers of store cards in the U.K. As part of that investigation, we responded to an information request. The provisional findings of the U.K. antitrust authorities were published in September 2005 and concluded that there are features in the store card sector that have an adverse effect on competition in this sector. The provisional findings contained proposed remedies (aimed at mitigating these adverse effects on competition) relating to the various insurance products sold to store cardholders.

 

The U.K. antitrust authorities have also conducted an initial review of the payment protection insurance sector. This review was in response to a complaint lodged under U.K. anti-trust law by a consumer activist group (the Citizens Advice Bureau). As part of the first stages of the review, we responded to an information request. A more detailed review is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 2006.

 

Also, in the U.K., the Financial Services Authority has conducted an industry-wide review of payment protection insurance products, as well as an industry-wide review of non-traditional financial arrangements. The report issued by the Financial Services Authority was critical of some of the sales methods used by distributors of payment protection insurance products. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business only acts as an underwriter of payment protection insurance products. The Financial Services Authority has also written to the distributors and underwriters of payment protection insurance products directing that certain corrective actions be undertaken. Our U.K. payment protection insurance business has responded to such a letter from the Financial Services Authority.

 

We cannot predict the effect these investigations may have on either the store card sector in the U.K. and the sale of insurance products linked to store cards or the wider payment protection insurance sector in the U.K or our payment protection business in the U.K.

 

99


Table of Contents

We cannot assure that the current investigations and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, it is possible that related investigations and proceedings may be commenced in the future, and we could become subject to further investigations and have lawsuits filed against us. In addition, increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

 

One of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries is named as a defendant in two lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, William Portis et al. v. GE Mortgage Insurance Corp. and Karwo v. Citimortgage, Inc. and General Electric Mortgage Insurance Corporation. The Portis complaint was filed on January 15, 2004, and the Karwo complaint was filed on March 15, 2004. Each action seeks certification of a nationwide class of consumers who allegedly were required to pay for our private mortgage insurance at a rate higher than our “best available rate,” based upon credit information we obtained. Each action alleges that the FCRA requires notice to such borrowers and that we violated the FCRA by failing to give such notice. The plaintiffs in Portis allege in the complaint that they are entitled to “actual damages” and “damages within the Court’s discretion of not more than $1,000 for each separate violation” of the FCRA. The plaintiffs in Karwo allege that they are entitled to “appropriate actual, punitive and statutory damages” and “such other or further relief as the Court deems proper.” Similar cases were filed against six other mortgage insurers. We have reached an agreement in principle to settle these cases. If an acceptable definitive settlement cannot be negotiated or approved by the courts, we intend to defend vigorously against the actions to which we are a party, but we cannot predict their outcome.

 

One of our subsidiaries is involved in an arbitration regarding our delegated underwriting practices. A mortgage lender that underwrote loan applications for mortgage insurance under our delegated underwriting program commenced the arbitration against us in 2003 after we rescinded policy coverage for a number of mortgage loans underwritten by that lender. We rescinded coverage because we believe those loans were not underwritten in compliance with applicable program standards and underwriting guidelines. However, the lender claims that we improperly rescinded coverage. In addition to seeking reinstatement of coverage, attorney’s fees and punitive damages are sought. The first phase of the arbitration covering 30 loans was held in January 2005 and the panel ordered that 28 of the loans be reinstated. The second phase covering 33 loans was held in July 2005 and the arbitration panel ordered reinstatement of coverage on 5 of the 33 loans. We agreed to a recess of the third phase of arbitration to determine if any settlement can be effected. We believe our maximum exposure for reinstatement based upon the risk in force on the rescinded coverage for all loans with this lender based upon the panel’s first and second phase findings would not exceed $10 million. If a settlement cannot be reached, we intend to contest vigorously all the claims in this arbitration although we cannot provide assurance that we will prevail.

 

One of our insurance subsidiaries is named as a defendant in a lawsuit, Wilma Juanita Kern, et al. v. General Electric Capital Assurance Company, filed on February 16, 2005 in the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit in Madison County, Illinois. The plaintiffs seek to proceed on the basis of a class action, brought on behalf of Illinois purchasers of long-term care insurance. Plaintiffs allege the improper refusal to provide long-term care benefits to long-term care insureds who were cared for in unlicensed facilities in Illinois, and the improper sale of policies requiring insureds to reside in licensed assisted care facilities during a time period when no licensed facilities, or too few licensed facilities were available in Illinois. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages for breach of contract, violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and unjust enrichment. We have filed a motion to dismiss and, in the alternative, to transfer venue. We intend to contest vigorously all claims in the case.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None

 

100


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market for Common Stock

 

Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GNW.” The following table sets forth the high and low intraday sales prices per share of our Class A Common Stock, as reported by The New York Stock Exchange, since the IPO for the periods indicated.

 

     High

   Low

2005

             

First Quarter

   $ 29.80    $ 25.72

Second Quarter

   $ 31.00    $ 26.80

Third Quarter

   $ 33.50    $ 29.26

Fourth Quarter

   $ 35.25    $ 29.73

 

     High

   Low

2004

             

Second Quarter (from May 25, 2004)

   $ 23.04    $ 18.75

Third Quarter

   $ 23.99    $ 20.75

Fourth Quarter

   $ 27.84    $ 22.77